{"id":65066,"date":"2002-04-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2002-04-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2002\/04\/18\/un-mot-de-william-pfaff\/"},"modified":"2002-04-18T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2002-04-18T00:00:00","slug":"un-mot-de-william-pfaff","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2002\/04\/18\/un-mot-de-william-pfaff\/","title":{"rendered":"Un mot de William Pfaff"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"common-article\">Un mot de William Pfaff<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t18 avril 2002 \u00a0Am\u00e9ricain vivant \u00e0 Paris, historien (<em>Barbarian Sentiments<\/em>), chroniqueur (on lit r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement ses chroniques dans l&rsquo;International <em>Herald Tribune<\/em> [IHT]), William Pfaff est un homme qui compte. On le lit avec attention. Ce qu&rsquo;il \u00e9crit ne l&rsquo;est pas \u00e0 la l\u00e9g\u00e8re.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tSon dernier article, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/55005.html\" class=\"gen\">publi\u00e9 ce matin dans l&rsquo;IHT,<\/a> est intitul\u00e9 \u00ab <em>The NATO allies are drifting apart<\/em> \u00bb. C&rsquo;est un commentaire qui nous fait un rapport de ce que fut le climat \u00e0 l&rsquo;une de ces conf\u00e9rences, discr\u00e8tes mais fameuses, o\u00f9 s&rsquo;\u00e9changent et se confrontent les avis entre alli\u00e9s, particuli\u00e8rement entre alli\u00e9s transatlantiques, souvent entre alli\u00e9s anglo-saxons. C&rsquo;est l\u00e0 qu&rsquo;on saisit mieux la couleur des pens\u00e9es et la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 des situations, loin du verbe l\u00e9nifiant et d\u00e9structur\u00e9 des communiqu\u00e9s, loin de la futilit\u00e9 aguicheuse des d\u00e9clarations des hommes politiques.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe rapport que nous fait Pfaff de cette derni\u00e8re conf\u00e9rence de Ditchley Park est sombre comme un cr\u00e9puscule. Il doit \u00eatre m\u00e9dit\u00e9, au-del\u00e0 des arguments et au-del\u00e0 des parti-pris. Il fixe le climat d&rsquo;une \u00e9poque o\u00f9 les choses changent \u00e0 un rythme qui nous d\u00e9passe si nous n&rsquo;y prenons garde.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEnfin, William Pfaff termine son article par ce court paragraphe, qui ne peut pas ne pas passer inaper\u00e7u, qui livre une r\u00e9flexion qui est de plus en plus un constat, qui rencontre d&rsquo;ailleurs la conviction grandissante de certains devant la d\u00e9t\u00e9rioration des rapports entre alli\u00e9s. On ne peut pas, aujourd&rsquo;hui, ignorer que des gens de qualit\u00e9, et des gens dont on sait qu&rsquo;ils sont remarquablement inform\u00e9s, en viennent \u00e0 de telles conclusions. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t(Ayant parl\u00e9 de la position des Europ\u00e9ens sur la guerre contre le terrorisme, que ces Europ\u00e9ens jugent compl\u00e8tement diff\u00e9remment des Am\u00e9ricains, et d&rsquo;une \u00e9ventuelle attaque contre l&rsquo;Irak, dont ils jugent qu&rsquo;elle aggravera encore la situation, William Pfaff poursuit &#8230;) : \u00ab <em>The Bush administration obviously disagrees. The disagreement is the most important that has existed between the allies since NATO began. It could destroy NATO. Worse than that, it could set the former allies against one another.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Un mot de William Pfaff 18 avril 2002 \u00a0Am\u00e9ricain vivant \u00e0 Paris, historien (Barbarian Sentiments), chroniqueur (on lit r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement ses chroniques dans l&rsquo;International Herald Tribune [IHT]), William Pfaff est un homme qui compte. On le lit avec attention. Ce qu&rsquo;il \u00e9crit ne l&rsquo;est pas \u00e0 la l\u00e9g\u00e8re. Son dernier article, publi\u00e9 ce matin dans l&rsquo;IHT,&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[398,1131,2804],"class_list":["post-65066","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires","tag-europe","tag-pfaff","tag-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65066","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65066"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65066\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65066"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65066"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65066"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}