{"id":65152,"date":"2002-06-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2002-06-30T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2002\/06\/30\/le-jsf-de-fortuyn\/"},"modified":"2002-06-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2002-06-30T00:00:00","slug":"le-jsf-de-fortuyn","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2002\/06\/30\/le-jsf-de-fortuyn\/","title":{"rendered":"Le JSF de Fortuyn"},"content":{"rendered":"

Le JSF de Fortuyn<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

30 juin 2002 — Des informations viennent d’\u00eatre publi\u00e9es par le journal n\u00e9erlandais Volkstrant<\/em> concernant les circonstances dans lesquelles le parti de Pym Fortuyn, le leader populiste libertarien n\u00e9erlandais assassin\u00e9 le 6 mai, a soutenu le projet d’entr\u00e9e des Pays-Bas dans le programme JSF. (Cet assassinat n’avait pas interrompu le processus \u00e9lectoral n\u00e9erlandais, qui avait abouti aux \u00e9lections du 15 mai, se d\u00e9roulant dans un climat \u00e9trange.<\/a>)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Le Guardian<\/em> de Londres, dans ses \u00e9ditions du 28 juin, publie un article sur les informations publi\u00e9es dans le Volkstrant \u00e0 propos de Mat Herben,<\/a> qui s’est fait \u00e9lire comme successeur de Pym Fortuyn. Ces informations font de Herben un agent du minist\u00e8re de la d\u00e9fense, voire des services de renseignement n\u00e9erlandais, infiltr\u00e9 dans le parti de Fortuyn avec comme but principal de contr\u00f4ler ce parti et de faire en sorte qu’il ne s’oppose pas \u00e0 l’entr\u00e9e des Pays-Bas dans le programme JSF\/F-35. Broos Schnez, un membre du comit\u00e9 de s\u00e9lection charg\u00e9 de contr\u00f4ler l’entr\u00e9e de Herben dans le parti de Fortuyn a d\u00e9clar\u00e9 au journal n\u00e9erlandais :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

« We were flabbergasted. The Netherlands needs to know what kind of person he is and he’s not honest. He is an old ministry of defence official and perhaps his job was to infiltrate the operation to get the party to vote for the fighter, something which we were always against. I’d advise him to go to a good lawyer and clear his name, but nothing is happening, and that’s strange.<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Voici ce qu’\u00e9crit notamment le Guardian<\/em> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

« … former associates of Fortuyn told the leading daily Volkskrant that Mr Herben, 49, who worked in the press office of the Dutch defence ministry for 22 years, blackmailed his way into the party. More controversially, they said he might have been planted by the establishment to ensure that the party voted for a $200bn (£135bn) US-led plan to build a new stealth fighter.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» The new parliament’s first action was to commit $800m to the F-35 project. All 24 members of the Fortuyn List joined the two other government parties in voting for the project, even though the party and its founder had been opposed to it. The vote was a relief to the US military and industrial complex because the reservations of leftwingers in the previous government made Dutch involvement uncertain.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» The suspicions raised by Fortuyn’s associates were supported by Volkskrant publishing extracts from emails sent by Mr Herben, before Fortuyn’s murder, lobbying the party to change its mind and back the project. It quoted five members of a selection panel which interviewed Mr Herben in January for membership of Fortuyn’s original party, Leefbaar Nederland, saying that he had tried to blackmail them into selecting him as a candidate by threatening to publicise information (never substantiated) that Fortuyn was a drug addict.<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Les informations publi\u00e9es par le Vokstrant<\/em> renforcent un climat extr\u00eamement \u00e9trange et pr\u00e9occupant autour des r\u00e9cents \u00e9v\u00e9nements aux Pays-Bas, que ce soit l’\u00e9mergence du parti de Fortuyn, son assassinat, les conditions de l’entr\u00e9e des Pays-Bas dans le programme JSF. Diverses informations ont d\u00e9j\u00e0 parues conduisant effectivement \u00e0 observer cette tendance \u00e0 \u00e9tablir des liens entre ces diverses affaires. On rappellera ici le passage d’un article sur la situation aux Pays-Bas publi\u00e9 le 11 mai par le journaliste Henk Ruyssenaars, sur le site Foreign Press Foundation<\/a>, et dont un passage concerne les rapports de Fortuyn et de la question de la participation n\u00e9erlandaise au programme JSF :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

« The US-ambassador, the Dutch Armed Forces and the Joint Strike Fighter.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» At stake : the power to amass future profits. The damage control has nothing to do with law, human rights or freedom of speech or such for human beings valuable things. First on the menu among many other deals : a multi -10 or more – millions $ deal concerning the ordering of Joint Strike Fighter planes which Holland does not even need. Professor Fortuyn was killed on Monday May 6th. The day before, last Sunday – May 5th – the American ambassador to the Netherlands Mr. Sobel, some American \u00a0\u00bbspecialists\u00a0\u00bb and Dutch generals contacted mr. Fortuyn concerning the JSF-deal. Since he was supposed to win in the upcoming elections his vote would be decisive. He told US ambassador Sobel and the delegation he would probably need those billions – with a slowing down economy – for more urgent things in Dutch society. Like medicare, education, public transport etc. Earlier and also in his political program, Fortuyn had declared he would get rid of most of the air force and the rest of the military, wanting to concentrate all powers to the Royal Dutch Navy. For people in uniform not a popular idea. For mr. Fortuyn the next day was his last.<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Les informations publi\u00e9es par le Volkstrant<\/em> soul\u00e8ve aussit\u00f4t plusieurs questions :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

• Quel effet ces informations vont-elles avoir sur le parti de Fortuyn et sur la formation du nouveau gouvernement n\u00e9erlandais? (Le Guardian<\/em> affirme qu’\u00e0 la suite de cette publication, « The future of the political party left behind by the murdered Dutch libertarian Pym Fortuyn was thrown into doubt<\/em> ». Le parti de Fortuyn est partie prenante dans le processus de constitution d’un nouveau gouvernement)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

• Quel effet vont-elles avoir sur la question du JSF aux Pays-Bas? Celle-ci reste un probl\u00e8me d’actualit\u00e9 dans la mesure où l’engagement n\u00e9erlandais n’implique pas une commande de l’avion pour la force a\u00e9rienne n\u00e9erlandaise, que celle-ci devra \u00eatre d\u00e9cid\u00e9e dans les 5 prochaines ann\u00e9es. Actuellement, on observe aux Pays-Bas l’\u00e9volution du PvDA (socialiste) ; r\u00e9ticents \u00e0 propos du JSF lorsqu’ils \u00e9taient dans la majorit\u00e9, les socialistes sont devenus franchement hostiles au programme maintenant qu’ils vont \u00eatre dans l’opposition.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

• Quel effet vont-elles avoir sur l’\u00e9volution des march\u00e9s des avions de combat? Cette affaire n\u00e9erlandaise est la seconde, apr\u00e8s l’affaire du choix du F-15K par la Cor\u00e9e du Sud, \u00e0 nous montrer qu’il existe d\u00e9sormais une probabilit\u00e9 s\u00e9rieuses d’interventions tr\u00e8s douteuses dans ce type de march\u00e9. (Au-del\u00e0, on pourrait s’interroger sur l’effet sur les relations transatlantiques, puisque cette \u00e9volution vers ces possibles interventions douteuses concerne des march\u00e9s où se trouvent concurrents des deux partenaires-concurrents, et qu’elle se fait toujours dans le m\u00eame sens. Mais une telle question pr\u00e9sumerait qu’il y a la possibilit\u00e9 d’une \u00e9volution de la position de l’Europe vis-\u00e0-vis de ces relations, ce qui reste hautement douteux.)<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le JSF de Fortuyn 30 juin 2002 — Des informations viennent d’\u00eatre publi\u00e9es par le journal n\u00e9erlandais Volkstrant concernant les circonstances dans lesquelles le parti de Pym Fortuyn, le leader populiste libertarien n\u00e9erlandais assassin\u00e9 le 6 mai, a soutenu le projet d’entr\u00e9e des Pays-Bas dans le programme JSF. (Cet assassinat n’avait pas interrompu le processus… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[3447,3223,3203,250,3445],"class_list":["post-65152","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires","tag-flavio","tag-fortuyn","tag-hollande","tag-jsf","tag-pays-bas"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65152","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65152"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65152\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65152"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65152"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65152"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}