\t21 octobre 2002 Nous publions ci-dessous \t9\/11 a compl\u00e8tement radicalis\u00e9 un syst\u00e8me politique (US) traditionnellement et fondamentalement centriste dans son expression et ses analyses (m\u00eame si son action, c’est autre chose). C’est-\u00e0-dire que nous avons un syst\u00e8me de substance et d’apparence centriste qui est aliment\u00e9 par des informations, des analyses et des objurgations radicales ; ce m\u00eame syst\u00e8me re\u00e7oit ces impulsions intellectuelles radicales, non comme telles mais comme des contributions mod\u00e9r\u00e9es faites au syst\u00e8me ; c’est-\u00e0-dire qu’en recevant ces impulsions politiques radicales, le syst\u00e8me les recycle et les rend respectables. Ce radicalisme respectabilis\u00e9 tend \u00e9videmment \u00e0 \u00e9liminer tout le reste par la puissance et le caract\u00e8re abrupt de ses affirmations, devant lesquelles analyses et affirmations mod\u00e9r\u00e9es p\u00e2lissent tant qu’elles se diluent dans l’inconsistance. La vie politique am\u00e9ricaine se radicalise \u00e0 l’extr\u00eame tout en pr\u00e9tendant rester centriste. C’est une situation de centre extr\u00e9miste, la pire de toutes. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCette attaque contre Jimmy Carter (r\u00e9cent prix Nobel de la Paix) est un bon exemple. Elle est de Christopher Ruddy, commentateur d’extr\u00eame-droite, de type haineux, qui serait en temps normal marginalis\u00e9. Aujourd’hui, il fait partie de ceux qu’on \u00e9coute.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tRuddy d\u00e9taille notamment :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00a0que Jimmy Carter est un tra\u00eetre parce qu’il a eu des contacts avec les Sovi\u00e9tiques au moment des \u00e9lections de 1980, puis en 1984 ;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t que d’autres tra\u00eetrises de Carter concernent notamment les rapports avec les Nord-Cor\u00e9ens apr\u00e8s la fin de la Guerre froide.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t que l’armement nucl\u00e9aire de la Cor\u00e9e du Nord a \u00e9t\u00e9 permis par Clinton-Carter, apr\u00e8s que la tentative de Carter pour emp\u00eacher le r\u00e9armement Reagan qui permit aux USA de l’emporter sur l’URSS ait \u00e9chou\u00e9 de justesse ; au-del\u00e0, la th\u00e8se est par cons\u00e9quent que la responsabilit\u00e9 de l’attaque 9\/11 repose non seulement sur Clinton (d\u00e9j\u00e0 accabl\u00e9 pour cela), mais sur Carter (\u00ab Ground Zero has a trail right back to the feet of Jimmy Carter in the Oval Office<\/em> \u00bb).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLa violence des propos, propre \u00e0 cette sorte de commentateurs, est aujourd’hui nettement li\u00e9e \u00e0 une tactique. Elle a pour fonction d’\u00e9carter les accusations qui peuvent \u00eatre lanc\u00e9es contre les conservateurs raicaux que ces m\u00eames propos veulent mettre en \u00e9vidence. Les propos impliquant Carter dans des n\u00e9gociations avec les Sovi\u00e9tiques ont notamment pour but de faire oublier qu’il y eut effectivement n\u00e9gociations entre l’\u00e9quipe Reagan et les islamistes iraniens (aujourd’hui, membres \u00e0 part enti\u00e8re du \u00ab Axis of Evil<\/em> \u00bb), pour que les otages de l’ambassade US de novembre 1979 ne soient pas lib\u00e9r\u00e9s, d’abord avant les \u00e9lections de novembre 1980, puis avant l’investiture de Reagan. De m\u00eame, la pression est d’autant plus intense chez ces commentateurs pour faire porter la responsabilit\u00e9 de 9\/11 sur Clinton, puis sur Carter dans ce cas, que la responsabilit\u00e9 de GW est tr\u00e8s fortement engag\u00e9e dans les erreurs et l’absence de vigilance.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tTout cela est couronn\u00e9 par une tentative actuelle de r\u00e9habiliter compl\u00e8tement Ronald Reagan, au niveau de sa politique, de ses capacit\u00e9s personnelles, de la probit\u00e9 de son administration, etc. (D’o\u00f9 la publicit\u00e9 faite dans ce billet au livre Reagan’s War<\/em>, de Peter Schweizer, qui est un des outils de cette offensive.) L’administration GW est compl\u00e8tement plac\u00e9e sous le parrainage de l’administration Reagan, elle en devient la continuation directe (les administration Clinton, mais aussi Bush-p\u00e8re, \u00e9tant jug\u00e9es tra\u00eetresses \u00e0 ce legs). Le lien avec la guerre froide est fermement \u00e9tabli, et moins la Guerre froide contre les Sovi\u00e9tiques (celle-l\u00e0 est finie, gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 Reagan, \u00e9videmment) que la Guerre froide interne aux US, conservateurs radicaux contre lib\u00e9raux, qui fait rage plus que jamais.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tFace \u00e0 cette attaque radicale de l’extr\u00eame-droite US, la gauche et l’extr\u00eame-gauche US, et aussi la droite et l’extr\u00eame-droite anti-guerre, ont \u00e9t\u00e9 jusqu’ici sur la d\u00e9fensive, depuis 9\/11. De ce c\u00f4t\u00e9, les choses commencent \u00e0 changer, notamment \u00e0 cause des avatars de GW, et des avatars de la question irakienne. L’intensit\u00e9 de la riposte devrait \u00eatre tr\u00e8s forte \u00e9galement. Nous aurons bient\u00f4t un syst\u00e8me soi-disant centriste abritant un affrontement de deux positions radicalis\u00e9es ou en pleine radicalisation (plus entre pro-guerre et anti-guerre qu’en droite-gauche de mani\u00e8re sp\u00e9cifique), influant directement sur le monde politique. L’intensit\u00e9 des sentiments hostiles (de la haine notamment) qui sont quasiment devenus politically correct<\/em> font craindre des encha\u00eenements d’une polarisation politique grandissante. Ce n’est pas la Guerre froide mais la Guerre civile froide qui passe \u00e0 une phase de plus en plus active.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tBy Christopher Ruddy Monday, Oct. 21, 2002<\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tGod must have a sense of humor.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tIn the same month that Jimmy Carter was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, a new book reveals that Carter may be guilty of treason, based on newly unearthed Soviet documents. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tAnd just days after it was announced that Carter had won the Peace Prize, North Korea announced that it had atomic weapons and some \u00a0\u00bbworse stuff.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCarter, the so-called \u00a0\u00bbpeacemaker,\u00a0\u00bb had been instrumental in the early ’90s in \u00a0\u00bbmediating\u00a0\u00bb U.S.-Korean relations, an effort that led to Clinton policies that actually helped North Korea build and acquire these weapons. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tIsn’t it odd that a man who has helped so many tyrants and dictators through the years should get the Nobel Peace Prize? <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tWe all know that the Nobel committee has long leaned toward the left, and long interpreted \u00a0\u00bbpeace\u00a0\u00bb as a result of capitulations by the West and democracies to bullying and tyrannical dictators. So the award should not have come as a surprise.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tThe Nobel committee said it gave the 39th president the award \u00a0\u00bbfor his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tThe facts show that, far from bringing peace, Carter has left a trail of disaster behind his long path. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tFar from being an honest mediator, Carter has been a shameless self-promoter who also may well have committed treason to keep himself in the presidency.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLast week, \u00a0\u00bbReagan’s War: The Epic Story of His Forty-Year Struggle and Final Triumph Over Communism\u00a0\u00bb (Doubleday) by Peter Schweizer was released.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tThis book offers damning evidence that Jimmy Carter, as both president and citizen, may have committed treason by enlisting the help of the Soviet Union in the 1980 and 1984 presidential elections. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tSchweizer combed through once-secret KGB and Communist Party files. What he discovered about Jimmy Carter is very disturbing.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tDocuments show, according to Schweizer, that in the closing days of the 1980 campaign, the Carter \u00a0\u00bbWhite House dispatched Armand Hammer to the Soviet Embassy for a secret meeting with Ambassador Dobrynin.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tHammer told Dobrynin that Carter was \u00a0\u00bbclearly alarmed at the way things stood in the election campaign.\u00a0\u00bb <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tHammer asked for Soviet help, especially to help Jewish emigration, which would have helped Carter’s standing in key electoral states. Hammer promised, \u00a0\u00bbCarter won’t forget that service if he is re-elected.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00a0\u00bbPeacemaker\u00a0\u00bb Carter was a boon to the Soviets. During his presidency, the Evil Empire reached its zenith, making bold moves in Ethiopia, Yemen, El Salvador, Grenada, Nicaragua and Afghanistan.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCarter once again sought the Soviets’ help in 1984.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCarter was out of office then, but he still felt the need to visit Ambassador Dobrynin at his Washington home. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tAccording to the Soviet document, Carter came to complain about Reagan and his defense buildup. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCarter told Dobrynin that if the Soviets didn’t do something about Reagan, \u00a0\u00bbthere would not be a single agreement on arms control, especially on nuclear arms, as long as Reagan remained in power.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCarter’s intention was clear. He wanted the Russians to intervene in some way to help get a Democrat back into the White House. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tThis new evidence questions Jimmy Carter’s patriotism. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tBut Carter’s devotion to \u00a0\u00bbpeace\u00a0\u00bb also was demonstrated to be wrongheaded by Reagan, who indeed won the Cold War without war, and has brought an era of harsh tyranny against populations worldwide, but bloody conflicts where millions had died. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tReagan’s strategy, as Schweizer shows, won the Cold War. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tStill, we should not forget that we are still suffering because of Carter’s decisions as president. It was Carter’s refusal to assist the Shah of Iran that allowed the Ayatollah Khomeini and Islamic fundamentalists to gain power and flourish. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tGround Zero has a trail right back to the feet of Jimmy Carter in the Oval Office. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tIf the Nobel committee were fair, it would have awarded the peace prize to Ronald Reagan. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tBut that will never happen, because Reagan didn’t apologize for dictators, didn’t pressure democracies to cave in to dictators, and didn’t accept millions of dollars from Arab sheiks and then complain about Israel’s human rights record. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tAnd unlike Carter, Reagan never kissed up to the media. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tAfter winning the Nobel Peace Prize, Carter telephoned NBC’s Katie Couric. Even she was surprised by the call. Why would Carter call her, of all people? <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCarter, the shameless, self-promoting politician, knew exactly what he was doing. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tGood PR from media liberals like Couric had helped cover up his record a record that includes consorting with our former enemy.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \t[Ce doit \u00eatre lu, selon l’usage, avec \u00e0 l’esprit la mention Disclaimer: In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.<\/em>.]<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Une haine intense 21 octobre 2002 Nous publions ci-dessous un billet d’un commentateur d’extr\u00eame-droite, qui est un des collaborateurs du site NewsMax.com. Publi\u00e9 hier, ce billet nous para\u00eet l’occasion d’une r\u00e9flexion rapide sur la vie politique aux USA. Notre but, dans ce cas (contrairement \u00e0 d’autres, certes) est beaucoup plus documentaire que pol\u00e9mique. Nous avons… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[3643,3215,3661],"class_list":["post-65301","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires","tag-carter","tag-reagan","tag-ruddy"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65301","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65301"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65301\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65301"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65301"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65301"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Jimmy Carter, Traitor? <\/h2>\n<\/p>\n