{"id":65356,"date":"2002-11-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2002-11-30T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2002\/11\/30\/confusion-type-nato\/"},"modified":"2002-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2002-11-30T00:00:00","slug":"confusion-type-nato","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2002\/11\/30\/confusion-type-nato\/","title":{"rendered":"Confusion type-NATO<\/em><\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"

D\u00e9sarroi type-NATO<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tLe 30 novembre 2002 Pour compl\u00e9ter le texte F&C publi\u00e9 ce m\u00eame jour<\/a>, voici un texte publi\u00e9 sur le site de Defense News<\/em>, dont nous donnons le lien mais qui n’est accessible qu’aux abonn\u00e9s<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCe texte de Brooks Tiger, tr\u00e8s court et post\u00e9 de Bruxelles, sera lu par nos lecteurs, nous en sommes s\u00fbrs, avec \u00e0 l’esprit la mention classique (\u00a0\u00bbDisclaimer: In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only.\u00a0\u00bb) :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab NATO, EU Rapid Reaction Program Raise Doubts<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb The lack of specifics in NATO’s decision to create a rapid response force has left European Union policy-makers here wondering how allied aspirations will complement the EU’s own rapid reaction force (RRF), say EU diplomats and officials.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb \u00a0\u00bbWe’ve sent all our technical documents about the RRF to NATO. They know everything we need and need to do. But we’ve received nothing in return because NATO can’t say yet how it’s going to pull its response force together,\u00a0\u00bb a Greek official told Defense News Nov. 26. \u00a0\u00bbThe co-development of these two forces is confusing, to say the least.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb The Greek government is steering planning for the RRF on behalf of Denmark, which holds the EU’s rotating six-month presidency until Dec. 31. Copenhagen opted out of defense-related EU policy for constitutional reasons. Greece takes over the EU presidency Jan. 1. The RRF is supposed to achieve initial operational capability some time in 2003.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tPeu de commentaires n\u00e9cessaires, sinon le rappel d’un texte que nous publiions le 28 octobre,<\/a> sur la cr\u00e9ation de cette Rapid Reaction Force, style-OTAN. Cette cr\u00e9ation reste une manoeuvre de pure opportunit\u00e9 et sans r\u00e9el but op\u00e9rationnel, qui n’a absolument pas le s\u00e9rieux du travail europ\u00e9en, qui se heurtera \u00e9videmment et se heurte d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e0 l’incapacit\u00e9 op\u00e9rationnelle et budg\u00e9taire des seuls Europ\u00e9ens qui s’y int\u00e9resseront, et \u00e0 la rapide d\u00e9saffection de Washington, o\u00f9 l’on est d\u00e9j\u00e0 pass\u00e9 \u00e0 autre chose.<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

D\u00e9sarroi type-NATO Le 30 novembre 2002 Pour compl\u00e9ter le texte F&C publi\u00e9 ce m\u00eame jour, voici un texte publi\u00e9 sur le site de Defense News, dont nous donnons le lien mais qui n’est accessible qu’aux abonn\u00e9s. Ce texte de Brooks Tiger, tr\u00e8s court et post\u00e9 de Bruxelles, sera lu par nos lecteurs, nous en sommes… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[584,3712],"class_list":["post-65356","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires","tag-otan","tag-rrf"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65356","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65356"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65356\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65356"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65356"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65356"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}