{"id":65454,"date":"2003-02-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-02-03T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2003\/02\/03\/lanti-france\/"},"modified":"2003-02-03T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2003-02-03T00:00:00","slug":"lanti-france","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2003\/02\/03\/lanti-france\/","title":{"rendered":"L’anti-France<\/em><\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"

L anti-France<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t2 f\u00e9vrier 2003 L’intensit\u00e9 des sentiments aux USA, surtout dans le sens de la haine vers l’ext\u00e9rieur, et aussi vers l’ennemi int\u00e9rieur, atteint une intensit\u00e9 remarquable. Le texte ci-dessous,<\/a> mettant en sc\u00e8ne le colonel (retir\u00e9 du Marine Corps) Oliver North, est tr\u00e8s significatif. Nous avons d\u00e9j\u00e0 publi\u00e9 un texte de North attaquant la France<\/a> \u00e0 la suite de son action \u00e0 l’ONU (r\u00e9union du 20 janvier du Conseil de S\u00e9curit\u00e9, \u00e9vocation de la possibilit\u00e9 de l’utilisation d’un droit de veto).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe point le plus \u00e9tonnant de l’opinion des dirigeants du syst\u00e8me, \u00e0 Washington et autour, est que l’\u00e9pisode pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent de l’ONU, aboutissant au vote de la r\u00e9solution 1441, continue \u00e0 \u00eatre per\u00e7ue comme une \u00e9pisode o\u00f9 la france a travaill\u00e9 avec les USA, pour la cause am\u00e9ricaine de l’attaque contre l’Irak. Ainsi l’intervention du 20 janvier et ce qui suit, notamment la th\u00e8se grotesque du ralliement de la France \u00e0 l’Allemagne, est-elle consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme une trahison de la France. La r\u00e9alit\u00e9 concernant le vote 1441 est qu’il s’agit d’un compromis o\u00f9 les Am\u00e9ricains ont pratiquement tout donn\u00e9 puisque, au d\u00e9part (en juillet-ao\u00fbt), il n’\u00e9tait pas question qu’ils aillent \u00e0 l’ONU, et qu’ensuite, venus \u00e0 l’ONU \u00e0 la mi-septembre, ils voulaient primitivement une r\u00e9solution leur donnant le droit d’attaquer et rien d’autre. Mais le vote de 1441, quand il a eu lieu, le 8 novembre, a \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 \u00e0 Washington comme une victoire US (un soutien de la th\u00e8se US par le Conseil de S\u00e9curit\u00e9), et la France devait naturellement \u00eatre assez bien consid\u00e9r\u00e9 dans le contexte de cette interpr\u00e9tation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de 1441 est qu’il s’agit d’un s\u00e9rieux freinage de la pouss\u00e9e US, puisque la r\u00e9solution institue les inspections et ne dfonne pas le droit automlatique de l’attaque en cas de material breach<\/em>. Charles Kupchan a, par exemple, justement interpr\u00e9t\u00e9 la chose lorsqu’il dit dans une interview<\/a> du d\u00e9but d\u00e9cembre 2002 : \u00ab In fact, everyone saw the recent voting at the U.N. Security Council as victory for the U.S. But what really happened? The U.S. went in and said, \u00a0\u00bbThis is our position, take it or leave it.\u00a0\u00bb Most of the Security Council, save Britain, said, \u00a0\u00bbLeave it.\u00a0\u00bb They locked arms with France rather than with us, which is what they’ve been doing for the last 50 years. That’s just the beginning of what the world could look like — main powers not working together. If it comes to that, then these other threats will diminish in importance and pale in comparison to a world in which the key players are no longer on the same sheet of music, in which Europe sets itself against us, rather than with us.<\/em> \u00bb <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa haine anti-fran\u00e7aise difficile d’offrir une autre expression \u00e0 la lecture de l’intervention de North, est donc d\u00e9cupl\u00e9e par les interpr\u00e9tations fauss\u00e9es autour de l’affaire 1441, qui sont un pur produit du syst\u00e9me virtualiste US. La France n’est plus seulement un ennemi ; elle est un ennemi qui a pu \u00eatre ramen\u00e9 \u00e0 la raison (dans le droit chemin) en novembre 2002 (r\u00e9solution 1441) et qui a trahi le 20 janvier. D’o\u00f9 les analogies historiques (surr\u00e9alistes par rapport \u00e0 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, certes) choisies par North d’une France trahissant l’Am\u00e9rique anim\u00e9e des meilleures intentions et de toute sa g\u00e9n\u00e9rosit\u00e9 (\u00ab North recalled how the U.S. had rescued France from Nazi Germany in World War II, and how the French had fired on Americans during that conflict.<\/em> \u00bb).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCe texte n’est pas le reflet d’une exception mais un exemple des sentiments existant largement dans l’extr\u00eame-droite am\u00e9ricaine qui est aujourd’hui l’inspiratrice id\u00e9ologique de l’administration. La circonstance n’est pas un \u00e9v\u00e9nement de province ou une r\u00e9union semi-vlandestine mais la conf\u00e9rence nationale Conservative Political Action Conference (C-PAC), regroupant certaines tendances de la dfroite chr\u00e9tienne extr\u00eame.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOliver North, quant \u00e0 lui, n’est pas un hurluberlu sans cr\u00e9dit, un lunatique \u00e9gar\u00e9. Lorsqu’il devint c\u00e9l\u00e8bre, il \u00e9tait n\u00b06 au National Security Council de Ronald Reagan et c’est lui qui, sous les ordres de Robert McFerlane puis de l’amiral Pointdexter, manipula toute l’affaire de l’Irangate, op\u00e9ration totalement ill\u00e9gale (en violation des ordonnances du Congr\u00e8s) et clandestine r\u00e9alis\u00e9e par les autorit\u00e9s US qu’il repr\u00e9sentait avec les r\u00e9seaux d’extr\u00eame-droite, les r\u00e9seaux des Contras<\/em> nicaraguayens, la Ligue Mondiale Anticommuniste, les r\u00e9seaux iraniens int\u00e9gristes (\u00e0 qui furent vendues clandestinement des missiles TOW), etc. Ayant quitt\u00e9 le service public et le Martine Corps, North devint conf\u00e9rencier, auteur \u00e0 succ\u00e8s et l’un des \u00e9ditorialistes les plus \u00e9cout\u00e9s de la droite chr\u00e9tienne extr\u00eame am\u00e9ricaine. Sa philosophie est \u00e0 l’image de celle du pr\u00e9sident : \u00ab [Iraqis] are evil and we are the good guys.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa graduation des ennemis pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e par le texte de NewsMax.com<\/em> n’est pas loin d’\u00eatre bien r\u00e9elle dans les pr\u00e9occupations de ces milieux : la France, l’Allemagne et Hillary Clinton. On peut ainsi mieux mesurer l’intensit\u00e9 du fanatisme qu’on y trouve en m\u00eame temps que les lubies historiques, sans le moindre rapport avec les r\u00e9alit\u00e9s de l’histoire, sur lesquelles s’appuie leur argumentation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCi-dessous, nous pr\u00e9sentons le texte de NewsMaw.com<\/em> qui concerne l’intervention du colonel North.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Top Threats to U.S. Security: Hillary, France, Germany <\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tBy Wes Vernon, NewsMax.com, Saturday, Feb. 1, 2003<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tARLINGTON, Va. While the French and the Germans are undermining the U.S. in the expected war with Iraq, Sen. Hillary Clinton has positioned herself to undermine the U.S. military’s effectiveness and strength. Those charges rang out Friday at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (C-PAC), co-sponsored by NewsMax.com.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCiting allegations that Paris and Berlin (which he labeled the axis of irrelevance) had taken cash from Saddam Hussein’s murderous regime, radio talk show host and former Marine Lt. Col. Oliver North defined the brie-eating French as a third-rate pathetic power.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tNorth recalled how the U.S. had rescued France from Nazi Germany in World War II, and how the French had fired on Americans during that conflict.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tNorth, a longtime hero to the nation’s conservatives, said that in 1942, President Franklin Roosevelt had broadcast to France, in imperfect but clear French, that American soldiers, sailors and Marines were preparing to rescue you. The cowardly French, sucking up to Hitler, repaid the U.S. by firing on Americans. These were the French! North declared, Well, we’re not fighting for the French this time. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tHe also blasted journalists here at home who somehow believe everyone is wrong except us. But he added, They [Iraqis] are evil, and we are the good guys.<\/p>\n

Hillary’s P.C. Threat to the Military<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n

\tElaine Donnelly , who heads the Center for Military Preparedness (CMR), warned that Clinton, D-N.Y., would henceforth become extremely influential in reorganizing the military to fit her radical left-wing feminist agenda.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tThe former first lady has just joined the Senate Armed Services Committee. As such, Donnelly predicted, she will be able to review promotions of officers, members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and numerous other issues near and dear to the hearts of our fighting forces and of paramount importance to our security and the lives of millions of Americans.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDonnelly says Sen. Clinton will be well-placed to blackball military officers and top brass who don’t toe her line on such issues as putting women in hand-to-hand combat, for example.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAlso, unlike former Rep. Patricia Schroeder, D-Colo., who took a highly adversarial position to the military when she served on the counterpart House Armed Services panel, Hillary Clinton has started to pose as a military supporter while not backtracking on her radical agenda one bit. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tShe will be able to bargain, and say to military officers and those in authority over them, I can get you what you want and help your promotion; now here’s what I want.’ Further, she will be helped along by such outside actions as a lawsuit Donnelly says has been filed in Massachusetts to force the military to draft women.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tThe CMR president also said Hillary could well be planning all of this for the next six years running up to a presidential run in 2008.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDonnelly criticized a recent panel that found co-ed training makes the Army less efficient, but that the Army would go ahead and continue it anyway, notwithstanding the sex scandals that have resulted. <\/p>\n

‘Axis of Jackasses’<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n

\tFormer FBI agent Gary Aldrich referred to anti-war activists in the U.S. as the axis of jackasses. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAldrich, president of the Patrick Henry Center, whose 1996 book Unlimited Access exposed security breakdowns in the Clinton White House, accused leftists who hurl cheap shots at President Bush’s Iraq policy of being more into maintaining power.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t[Notre recommandation est que ce texte doit \u00eatre lu avec la mention classique \u00e0 l’esprit, Disclaimer: In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only..]<\/em><\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L anti-France 2 f\u00e9vrier 2003 L’intensit\u00e9 des sentiments aux USA, surtout dans le sens de la haine vers l’ext\u00e9rieur, et aussi vers l’ennemi int\u00e9rieur, atteint une intensit\u00e9 remarquable. Le texte ci-dessous, mettant en sc\u00e8ne le colonel (retir\u00e9 du Marine Corps) Oliver North, est tr\u00e8s significatif. Nous avons d\u00e9j\u00e0 publi\u00e9 un texte de North attaquant la… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[3680,3826,2689,2651,3041,3825],"class_list":["post-65454","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires","tag-axe","tag-chretienne","tag-droite","tag-du","tag-mal","tag-north"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65454","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65454"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65454\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65454"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65454"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65454"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}