{"id":65574,"date":"2003-04-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-04-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2003\/04\/17\/lavertissement-de-eagleburger-suite\/"},"modified":"2003-04-17T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2003-04-17T00:00:00","slug":"lavertissement-de-eagleburger-suite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2003\/04\/17\/lavertissement-de-eagleburger-suite\/","title":{"rendered":"L’avertissement de Eagleburger (suite)<\/em><\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"

L’avertissement de Eagleburger (suite)<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t17 avril 2003 Il y a deux jours, nous publiions un Faits & Commentaires<\/a> concernant une d\u00e9claration de Lawrence Eagleburger, o\u00f9 l’ancien secr\u00e9taire d’\u00c9tat de Bush-p\u00e8re estimait qu’une attaque unilat\u00e9rale des USA contre la Syrie devrait conduire \u00e0 la destitution du pr\u00e9sident, Bush-fils. Depuis, nous avons re\u00e7u la transcription compl\u00e8te de la d\u00e9claration de Eagleburger, en fait la transcription compl\u00e8te de sa r\u00e9ponse \u00e0 la question sur ce sujet qu’on lui posait dans une interview de la BBC.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVoici cette r\u00e9ponse :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tLawrence Eagleburger, laughing : \u00ab I can only tell you.maybe I’ll be made of fool of when I say this but I can’t even imagine that and I’ve only recently heard somebody else say that this is a possibility. I just don’t think that anybody who says that truly understands the American people. You saw the furor that went on in this country before the President got sufficient support to do this. We’re just not built like that. Whether anybody is prepared to admit it or not, this is still a democracy and public opinion and the public still on these issues rules. If George Bush decided that he was going to turn the troops loose on Syria now, and Iran after that, he would last in office for about 15 minutes. You’re talking to somebody who frankly wishes we could knock Syria around a bit because I think they have been absolutely outrageous for years in terms of their support for terrorism. But, because I happen to believe that, doesn’t mean it’s going to happen. If President Bush were to try it now, even I would feel that he ought be impeached. You can’t get away with that sort of thing with this democracy. It’s ridiculous.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tCe qui nous a pouss\u00e9 \u00e0 compl\u00e9ter le pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent Faits & Commentaires<\/em> en publiant cette r\u00e9ponse, c’est le ton de cette r\u00e9ponse. Eagleburger est cat\u00e9gorique, comme nous l’avions not\u00e9, et il s’agit bien d’un message qu’on adresse \u00e0 l’administration GW Bush, et \u00e0 GW lui-m\u00eame. Mais il y a plus, beaucoup plus, et peut-\u00eatre est-ce le plus important : l’incr\u00e9dulit\u00e9 du ton d’Eagleburger. Il dit non seulement qu’un tel projet l’attaque de la Syrie se heurterait \u00e0 une forte r\u00e9sistance, mais encore il semble dire qu’il s’agit de quelque chose de si inconcevable, de si impensable que c’en est presque risible.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCe n’est pas du tout notre avis. Nous pensons que les \u00e9v\u00e9nements vont, au niveau de la perception qu’on en a, \u00e0 une telle rapidit\u00e9 qu’ils sont hors de contr\u00f4le et que les divers pouvoirs ne parviennent pas \u00e0 en reprendre le contr\u00f4le. (Quelle rapidit\u00e9 ? En moins d’un mois, une guerre qui appara\u00eet comme une promenade de sant\u00e9, puis comme un bourbier type-Viet-n\u00e2m, puis comme une victoire-\u00e9clair inattendue ; la guerre m\u00eame pas termin\u00e9e, l’apr\u00e8s-guerre qui semble appara\u00eetre d’abord comme un triomphe am\u00e9ricain, puis tr\u00e8s vite tourne en d\u00e9senchantement et en d\u00e9sordre hostile ; l\u00e0-dessus, les premi\u00e8res menaces contre la Syrie.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDans un tel climat de rapidit\u00e9 des choses et d’absence de contr\u00f4le sur leur d\u00e9veloppement, ce que l’establishment<\/em> type-Eagleburger juge impensable peut tr\u00e8s bien s’imposer avant qu’on y ait pens\u00e9 s\u00e9rieusement. La conclusion que nous voulons en tirer est que, face \u00e0 ces possibles d\u00e9veloppements impensables, s’ils se produisent, les r\u00e9actions seront d’autant plus fortes et, elles aussi, out of control<\/em>, et pouvant mener \u00e0 des tensions int\u00e9rieures qui peuvent para\u00eetre, elles aussi, pour l’instant, compl\u00e8tement impensables.<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L’avertissement de Eagleburger (suite) 17 avril 2003 Il y a deux jours, nous publiions un Faits & Commentaires concernant une d\u00e9claration de Lawrence Eagleburger, o\u00f9 l’ancien secr\u00e9taire d’\u00c9tat de Bush-p\u00e8re estimait qu’une attaque unilat\u00e9rale des USA contre la Syrie devrait conduire \u00e0 la destitution du pr\u00e9sident, Bush-fils. Depuis, nous avons re\u00e7u la transcription compl\u00e8te de… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[868,3867],"class_list":["post-65574","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires","tag-bush","tag-syrie"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65574","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65574"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65574\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65574"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65574"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65574"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}