{"id":65597,"date":"2003-05-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-05-02T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2003\/05\/02\/les-verites-moscovites-de-tony-blair\/"},"modified":"2003-05-02T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2003-05-02T00:00:00","slug":"les-verites-moscovites-de-tony-blair","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2003\/05\/02\/les-verites-moscovites-de-tony-blair\/","title":{"rendered":"Les v\u00e9rit\u00e9s moscovites de Tony Blair<\/em><\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Les v\u00e9rit\u00e9s moscovites de Blair<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t2 mai 2003 La visite \u00e0 Moscou de Tony Blair, le 29 avril, a \u00e9t\u00e9 un \u00e9chec spectaculaire, comme le PM britannique sait nous offrir ces derniers temps, impromptus, bien cinglants, tr\u00e8s inattendus, etc. Le Premier ministre britannique rencontrait Poutine pour deux raisons, l’une strat\u00e9gique et l’autre tactique :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t• Tenter de contribuer \u00e0 refaire une unit\u00e9 de la communaut\u00e9 internationale apr\u00e8s la guerre en Irak, en convainquant les Russes d’abandonner leur attitude hostile qui les fit figurer dans le front anti-guerre avec la France et l’Allemagne. Ce projet renvoie \u00e0 une vision de Blair des relations internationales, qu’il a expos\u00e9e avec pr\u00e9cision \u00e0 Moscou, en quelques mots. C’est l’aspect strat\u00e9gique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t• En faisant sortir la Russie du front anti-guerre, affaiblir l’axe franco-allemand et renforcer la position britannique en Europe. C’est l’aspect tactique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’\u00e9chec est complet, il est m\u00eame cuisant, et cela est un enseignement important, qui indique combien l’opposition \u00e0 l’Am\u00e9rique et \u00e0 son activisme est plus de nature fondamentale (strat\u00e9gique) que tactique (li\u00e9e \u00e0 une circonstance, comme la guerre en Irak). (Il n’est pas s\u00fbr que les Britanniques, totalement aveugl\u00e9s par les contraintes d’une alliance US \u00e0 la limite du supportable, admettent cette explication. On notait que des analystes du Foreign Office avan\u00e7aient encore, apr\u00e8s les incidents de Moscou, que l’attitude de Poutine \u00e9tait justifi\u00e9e par sa volont\u00e9 de plaire \u00e0 son opinion publique.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tPoutine s’est exprim\u00e9 d’une fa\u00e7on extr\u00eamement claire pour repousser toute possibilit\u00e9 d’arrangement dans l’\u00e9tat actuel des choses. Son intervention a \u00e9t\u00e9 particuli\u00e8rement incisive et brutale. La voici, telle que la rapporte The Guardian<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Mr Putin said Russia and its partners believe until clarity is achieved over whether weapons of mass destruction exist in Iraq, sanctions should be kept in place. Almost mocking Mr Blair, he went on: Where is Saddam? Where are those arsenals of weapons of mass destruction, if indeed they ever existed? Perhaps Saddam is still hiding somewhere in a bunker underground, sitting on cases of weapons of mass destruction and is preparing to blow the whole thing up and bring down the lives of thousands of Iraqi people.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb He added that sanctions could not be lifted since they had been introduced because Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.It is only the security council that is in a position to lift those sanctions, after all they introduced them.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb He also derided Mr Blair’s talk of a new world order, saying: If the decision-making process in such a framework is democratic then that is something we could agree with, but if decisions are being made by just one member of the international community and all the others are required to support them that is something we could not find acceptable.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Mr Putin insisted that the weapons inspectors could return now so that they could be summoned to any site in Iraq to make a professional conclusion on whether the weapons existed. The inspectors could be protected by UN or blue-helmeted soldiers along the line of the settlement reached in Afghanistan. He added that Russia was in a position to take immediate steps.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tDans l’extrait que nous pr\u00e9sentons, une allusion de Poutine concerne l’\u00e9vocation par Tony Blair d’une nouvelle organisation des relations internationales (\u00ab Mr Blair’s talk of a new world order<\/em> \u00bb). Ce point concerne une d\u00e9claration extr\u00eamement pressante de Blair sur la nouvelle organisation du monde, qui doit \u00eatre, selon lui, un regroupement unilat\u00e9ral derri\u00e8re les USA, sans la moindre h\u00e9sitation ni r\u00e9serve. Ce qui est caract\u00e9ristique, c’est \u00e0 la fois le ton path\u00e9tique de l’intervention de Blair, et \u00e0 la fois le mur d’hostilit\u00e9 russe (pour ne pas parler du reste) auquel elle se heurte. Nous sommes l\u00e0 au coeur du probl\u00e8me g\u00e9n\u00e9ral actuel.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVoici ce que Blair d\u00e9clare, selon deux versions de The Independent<\/em>, un article de Andrew Grice du 30 avril<\/a>, et un autre du m\u00eame Grice et de John Firchfield, du m\u00eame 30 avril<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab The Prime Minister warned of the real danger to the international community if it did not put behind it divisions caused by the Iraq conflict. I think that it can be made to work, but it requires goodwill and it requires a real vision and acceptance that this strategic partnership is the only alternative to a world which would break up into different poles of power, acting as rivals to one another, with every single dispute in the world being played off against these different poles of power. That is a real danger for our world.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t(…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab A grim-faced Mr Blair said: I don’t think there is any point in trying to gloss over the differences there have been. Renewing his attack on France, he warned that there was a real danger for our world if it broke into different poles of power, acting as rivals. The Prime Minister’s repeated criticism of France has further soured ties between London and Paris, which is furious at Mr Blair’s suggestion that it wants to break the transatlantic alliance.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tEn un sens, c’est une d\u00e9claration effrayante, \u00ab a real danger for our world<\/em> \u00bb, dit-il, si, en un mot, les r\u00e9calcitrants ne s’alignent pas sur les USA (principalement, France, Allemagne, Russie, et puis les autres, qui ne se comptent pas sur les seuls doigts d’une seule main). D’o\u00f9 vient ce danger ? On imagine mal la France ou la Russie menacer … les USA, si l’organisation du monde n’est pas unipolaire et l’alignement impeccable. Alors, le danger viendrait-il des USA ? C’est de cela que parle Tony Blair ? Sa proposition d’un \u00ab new world order<\/em> \u00bb a un aspect dr\u00f4lement path\u00e9tique. Pour la premi\u00e8re fois, de mani\u00e8re implicite mais que nous jugeons pas si obscure que cela, le Premier ministre nous parle en termes de danger et non plus en termes politiques, c’est-\u00e0-dire qu’il parle d’affrontement(s) possible(s).<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Les v\u00e9rit\u00e9s moscovites de Blair 2 mai 2003 La visite \u00e0 Moscou de Tony Blair, le 29 avril, a \u00e9t\u00e9 un \u00e9chec spectaculaire, comme le PM britannique sait nous offrir ces derniers temps, impromptus, bien cinglants, tr\u00e8s inattendus, etc. Le Premier ministre britannique rencontrait Poutine pour deux raisons, l’une strat\u00e9gique et l’autre tactique : •… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[3256,3987,916,2804,3986],"class_list":["post-65597","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires","tag-new","tag-order","tag-poutine","tag-usa","tag-world"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65597","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65597"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65597\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65597"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65597"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65597"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}