{"id":65611,"date":"2003-05-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-05-16T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2003\/05\/16\/pourquoi-ne-pas-desagreger-leurope\/"},"modified":"2003-05-16T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2003-05-16T00:00:00","slug":"pourquoi-ne-pas-desagreger-leurope","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2003\/05\/16\/pourquoi-ne-pas-desagreger-leurope\/","title":{"rendered":"Pourquoi ne pas \u201cd\u00e9sagr\u00e9ger\u201d l’Europe ?<\/em><\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Pourquoi ne pas d\u00e9sagr\u00e9ger l’Europe ?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t16 mai 2003 Une nouvelle alerte, une alerte tr\u00e8s s\u00e9rieuse pour les Europ\u00e9ens atlantistes, partisans d’une Europe align\u00e9e sur les USA, peut-\u00eatre l’alerte la plus s\u00e9rieuse qui soit. Dans un article du 13 mai de l’International Herald Tribune,<\/a> John Vinocur se fait indirectement mais s\u00e9rieusement l’\u00e9cho de l’inqui\u00e9tude pressante suscit\u00e9e par cette alerte. Un mot la r\u00e9sume : disaggregation, ou d\u00e9sagr\u00e9gation comme on l’a compris.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’inqui\u00e9tude de Vinocur est un point int\u00e9ressant. Ce journaliste nous a habitu\u00e9s \u00e0 un soutien inconditionnel des \u00e9volutions politiques de l’administration GW Bush. Sa sp\u00e9cialit\u00e9 est de faire la promotion des arguments des Europ\u00e9ens atlantistes, et de les accorder \u00e0 la politique am\u00e9ricaine contre les arguments des partisans d’une Europe autonome. Sa pr\u00e9occupation dans le cas de cette politique \u00e9ventuelle de Washington est d’autant plus significative.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa d\u00e9sagr\u00e9gation se pr\u00e9sente comme une volont\u00e9 de miner l’Union europ\u00e9enne, de s\u00e9parer les pays europ\u00e9ens les uns des autres… \u00ab a new kind of concern in Europe that the United States might be making the disaggregation of Europe dealing with like-minded individual parts rather than the unified whole of its aspirations the basis of future American policy<\/em> \u00bb On comprend bien que cette d\u00e9marche aura comme cons\u00e9quence \u00e9vidente de d\u00e9forcer consid\u00e9rablement les pays-relais des USA en Europe. Ces pays ne s’engagent pas derri\u00e8re les \u00c9tats-Unis en d\u00e9non\u00e7ant l’Europe mais, au contraire, en clamant qu’ils sont la vraie Europe (la new Europe<\/em>, nous dit obligeamment Rumsfeld. Une politique europ\u00e9enne d\u00e9structurante de l’Am\u00e9rique r\u00e9duit \u00e0 n\u00e9ant cet argument et fait des pays-relais de l’influence am\u00e9ricaine des tra\u00eetres de l’Europe (certains mauvais esprits n’y verraient qu’une simple mise en lumi\u00e8re de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9). Cela serait horriblement contre-productif et ces pays sont tr\u00e8s inquiets. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Coming out of the Iraq experience in which the Bush Administration may believe it successfully isolated its opponents, disaggregation or cherry-picking in relation to the EU would bring the United States into contradiction with its traditional position in favor of European integration. More important, it would turn America into a perceived opponent of what the project for European unity retains of idealism and political ambition.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Europe, including politicians from countries who want to escape an EU that sees itself as a counter-pole to the United States, emphatically does not like the disaggregation talk. It would put everybody in the position of constantly having to choose, a British official said. And that’s a bad position.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Javier Solana, the chief voice of the EU on foreign policy, said last week: I am concerned when I hear influential voices asking whether the United States would be better served by disaggregating Europe. Such an approach would not only contradict generations of American wisdom, it would also be profoundly misguided. Different voices must be heard and respected, not ostracized or punished.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb The expression of concern relates to a meeting last month in Washington at which, according to news agency reports, a State Department official said that disaggregation was now America’s approach to the EU.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tLa curiosit\u00e9 de cette affaire est qu’il n’y a rien de nouveau dans cette politique US, et pourtant tout est nouveau. Avant (pendant la Guerre froide), on ne disait pas d\u00e9sagr\u00e9ger, on disait saucissonner, et l’Am\u00e9rique s’y connaissait dans la tactique de prendre les pays europ\u00e9ens les uns apr\u00e8s les autres pour les retourner quand une mati\u00e8re g\u00e9n\u00e9rale l’opposait \u00e0 l’Europe en tant que telle. Mais elle avait soin d’ajouter qu’elle soutenait la construction europ\u00e9enne, et elle le faisait effectivement (les Am\u00e9ricains n’ont jamais craint les contradictions).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCe qui est compl\u00e8tement nouveau dans ces hypoth\u00e8ses de d\u00e9sagr\u00e9gation, c’est que les Am\u00e9ricains cette fois ne se cachent plus de vouloir s\u00e9parer les Europ\u00e9ens et qu’ils laissent entendre l\u00e0-dessus qu’ils s’opposeraient \u00e0 l’Europe (la construction europ\u00e9enne). On ne peut r\u00eaver une politique plus maladroite et il faudra en chercher la cause dans la psychologie ferm\u00e9e des Am\u00e9ricains.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVinocur termine en g\u00e9missant :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Regardless of the reality of this characterization, a friend of the United States who had knowledge of the Washington meeting said the disaggregation talk was quite alarming and, quite obviously, could not serve European or American interests.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Pourquoi ne pas d\u00e9sagr\u00e9ger l’Europe ? 16 mai 2003 Une nouvelle alerte, une alerte tr\u00e8s s\u00e9rieuse pour les Europ\u00e9ens atlantistes, partisans d’une Europe align\u00e9e sur les USA, peut-\u00eatre l’alerte la plus s\u00e9rieuse qui soit. Dans un article du 13 mai de l’International Herald Tribune, John Vinocur se fait indirectement mais s\u00e9rieusement l’\u00e9cho de l’inqui\u00e9tude pressante… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[3996,3995],"class_list":["post-65611","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires","tag-desagreger","tag-saucissonner"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65611","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65611"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65611\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65611"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65611"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65611"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}