{"id":65640,"date":"2003-06-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2003-06-10T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2003\/06\/10\/limage-detruite-de-lamerique\/"},"modified":"2003-06-10T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2003-06-10T00:00:00","slug":"limage-detruite-de-lamerique","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2003\/06\/10\/limage-detruite-de-lamerique\/","title":{"rendered":"L’image d\u00e9truite de l’Am\u00e9rique<\/em><\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"

L’image d\u00e9truite de l’Am\u00e9rique <\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t10 juin 2003 Ce commentaire de Ash Pulcifer, de YellowTimes.org<\/a>, s’attache \u00e0 un r\u00e9cent r\u00e9sultat de l’enqu\u00eate du Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, sur l’\u00e9volution de l’Am\u00e9rique dans le monde. Cette enqu\u00eate, permanente, est dirig\u00e9e par Madeleine Albright. Cette fois, c’est l’image de l’Am\u00e9rique apr\u00e8s la guerre d’Irak qui est mesur\u00e9e et d\u00e9crite. Elle est \u00e9videmment catastrophique, en d\u00e9clin permanent, mesurant une perte de popularit\u00e9 absolument consid\u00e9rable depuis l’attaque du 11 septembre 2001.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tTous les efforts de relations publiques\/propagande de l’administration GW Bush, sans aucun doute tr\u00e8s puissants, n’ont abouti \u00e0 aucun r\u00e9sultat positif. Le bon sens dit qu’ils ont \u00e9t\u00e9 probablement, au vu de ce qu’ils furent, compl\u00e8tement contre-productifs. Tous les poncifs sont bien pr\u00e9sents, sans doute parce qu’ils recouvrent une bonne dose de r\u00e9alit\u00e9, \u00e0 commencer par le fait que la guerre contre le terrorisme est per\u00e7ue comme une guerre contre l’Islam.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCette r\u00e9alit\u00e9 statistique, qui r\u00e9pond compl\u00e8tement \u00e0 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 pure et simple, est compl\u00e8tement d\u00e9solante par ce qu’elle montre de maladresse, d’incons\u00e9quence, d’indiff\u00e9rence \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard du monde ext\u00e9rieur, de la part de l’administration GW, et de l’Am\u00e9rique derri\u00e8re elle. Cet \u00e9tat de tension entre l’Am\u00e9rique et le reste du monde, entre cette hostilit\u00e9 du reste du monde contre l’Am\u00e9rique et l’omnipr\u00e9sence de l’Am\u00e9rique sur le reste du monde, est l\u00e0 pour alimenter toutes les crises \u00e0 venir. Elle fait de la situation actuelle des relations internationales une situation conflictuelle sans issue par les voies normales, et par les actions telles qu’elles sont men\u00e9es aujourd’hui.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Further fanning of the flames<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

\tBy Ash Pulcifer, YellowTimes.org, June 08, 2003<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIn December of 2002, the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press released a study titled, What the World Thinks in 2002. The study, containing poll results from 27 countries around the world, examines how the global community perceives the United States. The results of this study were shocking, as it showed that positive attitudes <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\ttoward the United States had plummeted since the election of the Bush administration. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tThe study, discussed in greater detail in Fanning the flames of resentment, found that in 19 of the 27 countries polled, attitudes toward the United States had shifted dramatically. From Western Europe to Latin America, genuine anger toward the United States was sharply increasing. Most worrying, in Muslim-majority countries, feelings toward the United States <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\thad turned dangerously negative; many Muslims believed, and still do, that the war on terrorism is actually a war on Islam.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAfter this poll was released, the Bush administration launched a propaganda campaign to convince peoples typically leery of the U.S. that the United States is a positive force for world order. Unfortunately for the United States, this propaganda effort has so far failed. A follow-up Pew Research Center poll, released June 3rd, shows that attitudes toward the United <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tStates have worsened, mostly due to the invasion of Iraq. The organization stated that attitudes toward the United States had begun to settle down, yet the U.S. invasion of Iraq caused an eruption in negative sentiment toward the United States. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAndrew Kohut, director of the Pew Research Center, stated, We have gone from bad to worse over the past year. We [America] have been unable to make the case against bin Laden with Muslims because they see the United States as a threat. The poll also shows that in every Arab country except for Kuwait and Lebanon Osama bin Laden inspires more confidence than U.S. President Bush. Despite this, the study showed no correlation between <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tdislike for President Bush and dislike for American ideas and cultural norms. As Michael Dobbs writes in the Chicago Tribune, People who expressed a favorable opinion of bin Laden were just as likely to appreciate U.S. technology and cultural products as people opposed to bin Laden, according to [Andrew] Kohut. This fact shows that it is President Bush himself, along with his administration, that is responsible for the massive political <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tfallout taking place in Muslim-majority countries. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tNegative attitudes toward the U.S. are increasing in other countries as well. In Britain, Canada, and Russia, for example, opinions toward the United States have turned sharply negative in the last year. Many Americans could care less what the rest of the world thinks about the U.S. government. After all, it was America that was attacked on September 11, not Germany or France. However, it is important to take into account how others throughout the world feel about the United States. Resentment toward the U.S. can quickly turn into hatred, as it already has throughout most of the Muslim world. And most concernedly, hatred often turns into action, which will mean even more violence committed toward the United States and its interests. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIf the Bush administration continues its current interventionist approach, there is no doubt that more radical groups will be created with the sole purpose of hurting the United States government and its people. As stated in a Defense Science Board report released in 1997, historical data show a strong correlation between U.S. involvement in international situations and an increase in terrorist attacks against the United States. If this Defense Science Board analysis is correct, then Americans may be in for a longer battle with terrorism and anti-Americanism than they realize.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tTaking all of this into account, it becomes clear that the war on terrorism needs to be fought with different weapons. Rather than fanning the flames of resentment by intervening all across the globe, the Bush administration should instead be working to heal the rift between the United States, the Muslim world, and other countries where hatred toward the United <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tStates is increasing. This can be done by actually listening to the desires and wants in the Muslim world and elsewhere, and not simply forcing a model of life upon them. If the Bush administration fails to do this, they will only be exacerbating the very problems that have caused this deadly backlash against U.S. interests.<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L’image d\u00e9truite de l’Am\u00e9rique 10 juin 2003 Ce commentaire de Ash Pulcifer, de YellowTimes.org, s’attache \u00e0 un r\u00e9cent r\u00e9sultat de l’enqu\u00eate du Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, sur l’\u00e9volution de l’Am\u00e9rique dans le monde. Cette enqu\u00eate, permanente, est dirig\u00e9e par Madeleine Albright. Cette fois, c’est l’image de l’Am\u00e9rique apr\u00e8s la guerre… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65640","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65640","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65640"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65640\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65640"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65640"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65640"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}