{"id":65900,"date":"2004-03-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-03-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2004\/03\/17\/viva-zapatero\/"},"modified":"2004-03-17T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2004-03-17T00:00:00","slug":"viva-zapatero","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2004\/03\/17\/viva-zapatero\/","title":{"rendered":"<strong><em>Viv\u00e0 Zapatero ?<\/em><\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"common-article\">Viv\u00e0 Zapatero ?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\t17 mars 2004  Un facteur politique important depuis le choc du 15 mars, c&rsquo;est la parole ; en fait, celle, tonitruante, du nouveau Premier ministre Jos\u00e9 Luis Rodrigues Zapatero.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tTout nous faisait croire, \u00e0 nous, habitu\u00e9s des manoeuvres, des triples ou quadruples langages, du formidable conformisme qui fait peser sa chape de plomb sur nos pauvres \u00e2mes attrist\u00e9es, tout nous faisait croire \u00e0 une intervention en douceur du nouveau Premier ministre espagnol, pour pr\u00e9parer son arriv\u00e9e au pouvoir le plus proche possible du <em>consensus<\/em> sempiternel. C&rsquo;\u00e9tait la prudence m\u00eame, et c&rsquo;est l&rsquo;habitude de nos \u00e9lites, de notre syst\u00e8me. C&rsquo;\u00e9tait aussi la norme dans nos \u00e9lites politiques europ\u00e9ennes r\u00e9tives \u00e0 l&rsquo;approbation de la guerre irakienne, disant du bout des l\u00e8vres et <em>mezzo voce<\/em> leur d\u00e9saccord avec les Anglo-Saxons (Blair-Bush) et leur folie irakienne alors qu&rsquo;ils fulminent en priv\u00e9 contre cette guerre, ses mensonges et son d\u00e9sordre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPas du tout : Zapatero a pris le contre-pied. Ses attaques contre Bush et Blair ont une violence extraordinaire, compl\u00e8tement inhabituelle. Le mot mensonge r\u00e9sonne d\u00e9sormais sans la moindre retenue, et aussi cette invitation extraordinaire \u00e0 Bush et \u00e0 Blair de faire leur auto-critique. C&rsquo;est, nous dit-on,  et on a pu le constater, d&rsquo;ailleurs,  avec le plus grand calme que \u00ab <em>the quietly spoken leader<\/em> \u00bb a <a href=\"http:\/\/news.independent.co.uk\/europe\/story.jsp?story=501661\" class=\"gen\">lanc\u00e9 ses attaques<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Announcing that the 1,300 Spanish troops currently stationed in Iraq would be pulled out by the summer, the quietly spoken leader declared: You can&rsquo;t organise a war with lies.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Mr Blair and Mr Bush must do some reflection and self-criticism, he added in remarkably frank comments for the next prime minister of Europe&rsquo;s youngest democracy and fifth largest economy.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t(&#8230;) <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb Mr Zapatero <em>told Spanish radio his triumph was a consequence of the conflict&rsquo;s unpopularity with voters. But a more immediate explanation for the swing was last Thursday&rsquo;s bomb attacks on Madrid which left 200 people dead. The Government initially attempted to blame the Basque separatist group, Eta, for the atrocity. When it became apparent that groups affiliated to al-Qa&rsquo;ida were almost certainly responsible, many Spaniards used the ballot to vent their anger at the Government&rsquo;s support for the war, which they blamed for making the country a target of Islamic terrorists.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>In another blow to the British Government, Mr Zapatero also promised to relaunch his country&rsquo;s policy of co-operation with Europe, turning his back on Mr Blair&rsquo;s attempt to establish an alternative sphere of influence in the EU.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Military intervention in Iraq was a political mistake, Mr Zapatero said yesterday. It divided more than it united, there were no reasons for it. Time has shown that the arguments for it lacked credibility. You cannot bomb by chance.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tOutre l&rsquo;\u00e9clairage nouveau que ses interventions apportent au d\u00e9bat g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, les paroles de Zapatero, appuy\u00e9es sur le double \u00e9v\u00e9nement des attentats du 11 et du vote du 14, constituent elles-m\u00eames un \u00e9v\u00e9nement d&rsquo;une grande importance. Il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;une lib\u00e9ration de la parole qui, dans une politique r\u00e9gl\u00e9e par le m\u00e9diatisme et le virtualisme qui en d\u00e9coule, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire r\u00e9gl\u00e9e par la parole (mensong\u00e8re en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral), va jouer un r\u00f4le \u00e9videmment consid\u00e9rable.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tZapatero devrait \u00eatre suivi par ceux qui ont des choses \u00e0 dire et qui, soudain, trouvent l&rsquo;opportunit\u00e9 et le climat moral pour pouvoir les dire, ainsi que leur int\u00e9r\u00eat (\u00e9ventuellement \u00e9lectoraliste). D\u00e8s lundi, \u00e0 la radio, Romano Prodi renouvelait des jugements assez durs <a href=\"http:\/\/english.aljazeera.net\/NR\/exeres\/7FAF9B12-031A-49DA-B0E9-FC42CE5DDA23.htm\" class=\"gen\">qu&rsquo;il avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 dits dans une interview paraissant lundi matin<\/a>. Si ses condamnations n&rsquo;atteignent pas l&rsquo;intensit\u00e9 de celles de Zapatero, elles font n\u00e9anmoins partie de la nouvelle p\u00e9riode europ\u00e9enne, celle d&rsquo;apr\u00e8s-3\/11, celle o\u00f9 l&rsquo;on ne m\u00e2che plus ses mots.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>The European Commission president has said a war on terror that uses force rather than thought is no answer to resolving conflicts. In an interview published on Monday, Romani Prodi claimed last week&rsquo;s deadly bomb attack in Madrid showed the negative impact of Iraq&rsquo;s invasion.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>It is clear that using force is not the answer to resolving the conflict with terrorists, Prodi was quoted as saying in the daily La Stampa. We must remember that it has been a year since the war in Iraq started. Terrorism is infinitely more powerful than a year ago.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl ne fait aucun doute que ce nouveau style, s&rsquo;il se r\u00e9pand, devrait peser sur la politique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale et les relations transatlantiques. Tous nos dirigeants sont tr\u00e8s sensibles \u00e0 l&rsquo;apparence, certains n&rsquo;ont que cela. Une attaque \u00e0 ce niveau est un fait politique consid\u00e9rable. Du c\u00f4t\u00e9 de Zapatero, dans tous les cas, il mesure la col\u00e8re et la rancoeur des Espagnols apr\u00e8s l&rsquo;attentat et les manipulations qui ont suivi et, d\u00e9sormais, ouvertement \u00e0 l&rsquo;encontre de la politique am\u00e9ricaine. Ces paroles vont dicter la politique. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Viv\u00e0 Zapatero ? 17 mars 2004 Un facteur politique important depuis le choc du 15 mars, c&rsquo;est la parole ; en fait, celle, tonitruante, du nouveau Premier ministre Jos\u00e9 Luis Rodrigues Zapatero. Tout nous faisait croire, \u00e0 nous, habitu\u00e9s des manoeuvres, des triples ou quadruples langages, du formidable conformisme qui fait peser sa chape de&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-65900","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65900","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65900"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65900\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65900"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65900"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65900"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}