{"id":66121,"date":"2004-11-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-11-05T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2004\/11\/05\/la-these-votergate-commence-a-se-repandre-le-2-novembre-2004-the-most-massive-election-fraud-in-the-history-of-the-world\/"},"modified":"2004-11-05T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2004-11-05T00:00:00","slug":"la-these-votergate-commence-a-se-repandre-le-2-novembre-2004-the-most-massive-election-fraud-in-the-history-of-the-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2004\/11\/05\/la-these-votergate-commence-a-se-repandre-le-2-novembre-2004-the-most-massive-election-fraud-in-the-history-of-the-world\/","title":{"rendered":"La th\u00e8se \u201cVoterGate\u201d commence \u00e0 se r\u00e9pandre : le 2 novembre 2004, \u201cthe most massive election fraud in the history of the world\u201d?<\/em><\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"

La th\u00e8se VoterGate commence \u00e0 se r\u00e9pandre : le 2 novembre 2004, the most massive election fraud in the history of the world?<\/h3>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tEn fait de lecture d’un texte, c’est \u00e0 celle de deux textes comme amorce de beaucoup d’autres lectures que nous convions nos lecteurs. Cela concerne une hypoth\u00e8se qui commence \u00e0 \u00eatre d\u00e9velopp\u00e9e dans les milieux dissidents et des droits civiques aux USA : l’hypoth\u00e8se VoterGate<\/em>, c’est-\u00e0-dire l’hypoth\u00e8se de ce qui serait, selon le mot de Thom Hartmann dont le texte est ci-dessous<\/a>, the most massive election fraud in the history of the world<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tUne hypoth\u00e8se est faite \u00e0 partir d’une enqu\u00eate concernant le constat d’une grande divergence entre les sondages post-votes (\u00e0 la sortie des bureaux de vote) et les r\u00e9sultats d\u00e9finitifs, divergence aboutissant \u00e0 Kerry vainqueur dans un cas et Kerry battu dans l’autre, et dans des \u00c9tats aussi essentiels que la Floride et l’Ohio. D’autre part, il y a les cas sp\u00e9cifiques de l’Ohio (\u00e0 nouveau) et du Nouveau Mexique, d\u00e9velopp\u00e9s d’une fa\u00e7on extr\u00eamement d\u00e9taill\u00e9e par Greg Palash, journaliste r\u00e9put\u00e9 de Harper’s<\/em>. (Deuxi\u00e8me texte ci-dessous<\/a>, sur TomPaine.com.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDivers r\u00e9seaux s’occupent de cette affaire des fraudes du 2 novembre qui, si elle se confirmait, serait \u00e9videmment \u00e9norme. Diverses pr\u00e9occupations ont \u00e9t\u00e9 exprim\u00e9es sur la loyaut\u00e9 du d\u00e9pouillement \u00e9lectronique qui ne laisse aucune trace-papier ( !), dans un pays o\u00f9 les machines \u00e9lectroniques de d\u00e9pouillement sont g\u00e9r\u00e9es par des soci\u00e9t\u00e9s priv\u00e9es, en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral proches politiquement et id\u00e9ologiquement des r\u00e9publicains et de GW Bush. D’autre part, il y a les hypoth\u00e8ses des votes non compt\u00e9s, pour les \u00c9tats de l’Ohio et du Nouveau Mexique. Le d\u00e9compte de l’\u00c9tat de Floride est \u00e9galement suspect. Et ainsi de suite, la vaste Am\u00e9rique n’est jamais \u00e0 court de sensations.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOn recommande ici de suivre cette affaire sur les r\u00e9seaux concern\u00e9s, notamment http:\/\/blackboxvoting.org (org, pas com)<\/a>, mais \u00e9galement http:\/\/>www.alternet.org, o\u00f9 Hartmann publie son texte. A partir de blackboxvoting.org<\/em>, d’autres liens sont accessibles, notamment au travers d’une organisation-parente, http:\/\/www.votergate.tv\/links.html<\/a>, qui offre \u00e9galement une floraison de liens internes. On peut consulter aussi les analyses de Raw Story sur le sujet<\/a>, avec les r\u00e9actions des lecteurs. Le travail de Palash est \u00e9galement \u00e0 suivre ; en attendant, on trouve \u00e9galement sur son texte<\/a> des liens int\u00e9ressants.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSur la validit\u00e9 th\u00e9orique g\u00e9n\u00e9rale de cette hypoth\u00e8se, bien s\u00fbr, on ne peut qu’envisager une approche positive. Ce qui importe ici est la privatisation du processus qui, effectivement, non seulement autorise mais favorise toutes les fraudes. (Et l’on songe, bien entendu, \u00e0 l’engagement id\u00e9ologique du monde des corporates<\/em> aux USA, visible Big Business<\/em>. De l\u00e0 \u00e0 envisager l’hypoth\u00e8se de la fraude, il y a beaucoup moins qu’un pas.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tMais soyons plus s\u00e9rieux. L’hypoth\u00e8se de la fraude est une simple question de bon sens, et un tribut rendu au professionnalisme des gens de la bande GW. Le soup\u00e7on n’existe pas avec l’administration GW, il n’y a que les certitudes qui sont celles de l’ill\u00e9galit\u00e9 massive et constante, quasiment structurelle ; un acc\u00e8s de sinc\u00e9rit\u00e9 ou de loyaut\u00e9 par rapport au processus d\u00e9mocratique signifierait que cette administration est en grand danger de perdre ses vertus, qu’elle en devient m\u00e9prisable. Cette administration ne fonctionne qu’au mensonge et \u00e0 la fraude, et il faut rechercher le plus gros mensonge et la plus grosse fraude possibles pour esp\u00e9rer s’approcher de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9. Il serait tout simplement extraordinaire et surr\u00e9aliste qu’il y ait eu absence de fraude, c’est-\u00e0-dire faute professionnelle grave pour l’\u00e9quipe de Karl Rove, pour cette victoire impr\u00e9vue et inattendue.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tToutes ces actions sur Internet vont-elles d\u00e9boucher sur une vraie affaire politique ? On a vu d’autres cas o\u00f9 la connexion s’est faite, dans quelques-uns des scandales-GW qui ont \u00e9t\u00e9 r\u00e9v\u00e9l\u00e9s au public gr\u00e2ce \u00e0 Internet durant le premier terme. Attendons la suite. Pour nous faire patienter, il y a cette belle pens\u00e9e de Greg Palash, comme conclusion de son article : \u00ab Several friends have asked me if I will again leave the country. In light of the failure a second time to count all the votes, that won’t be necessary. My country has left me.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Exit Polls Right, Tallies Wrong?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tBy Thom Hartmann, AlterNet. Posted November 5, 2004<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tThe hot story in the blogosphere is that the \u00a0\u00bberroneous\u00a0\u00bb exit polls that showed Kerry carrying Florida and Ohio (among other states) weren’t erroneous at all it was the numbers produced by paperless voting machines that were wrong, and Kerry actually won. As more and more analysis is done of what may (or may not) be the most massive election fraud in the history of the world, however, it’s critical that we keep the largest issue at the forefront at all time: Why are We The People allowing private, for-profit corporations, answerable only to their officers and boards of directors, and loyal only to agendas and politicians that will enhance their profitability, to handle our votes?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tMaybe Florida went for Kerry, maybe for Bush. Over time and through the efforts of some very motivated investigative reporters we may well find out (Bev Harris of blackboxvoting.org just filed what may be the largest Freedom of Information Act [FOIA} filing in history), and bloggers and investigative reporters are discovering an odd discrepancy in exit polls being largely accurate in paper-ballot states and oddly inaccurate in touch-screen electronic voting states. Even raw voter analyses are showing extreme oddities in touch-screen-run Florida, and eagle-eyed bloggers are finding that news organizations are retroactively altering their exit polls to coincide with what the machines ultimately said.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBut in all the discussion about voting machines, let’s never forget the concept of the commons, because this usurpation is the ultimate felony committed by conservatives this year.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAt the founding of this nation, we decided that there were important places to invest our tax (then tariff) dollars, and those were the things that had to do with the overall \u00a0\u00bblife, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness\u00a0\u00bb of all of us. Over time, these commons in which we all make tax investments and for which we all hold ultimate responsibility have come to include our police and fire services; our military and defense; our roads and skyways; our air, waters and national parks; and the safety of our food and drugs.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBut the most important of all the commons in which we’ve invested our hard-earned tax dollars is our government itself. It’s owned by us, run by us (through our elected representatives), answerable to us, and most directly responsible for stewardship of our commons.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAnd the commons through which we regulate the commons of our government is our vote.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAbout two years ago, I wrote a story for Common Dreams, \u00a0\u00bbIf You Want To Win An Election, Just Control The Voting Machines,\u00a0\u00bb that exposed how Sen. Chuck Hagel had, before stepping down and running for the U.S. Senate in Nebraska, been the head of the voting machine company (now ES&S) that had just computerized Nebraska’s vote. The Washington Post (1\/13\/1997) said Hagel’s \u00a0\u00bbSenate victory against an incumbent Democratic governor was the major Republican upset in the November election.\u00a0\u00bb According to Bev Harris, Hagel won virtually every demographic group, including many largely black communities that had never before voted Republican. Hagel was the first Republican in 24 years to win a Senate seat in Nebraska, nearly all on unauditable machines he had just sold the state. And in all probability, Hagel will run for president in 2008.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIn another, later article I wrote at the request of MoveOn.org and which they mailed to their millions of members, I noted that in Georgia another state that went all-electronic \u00a0\u00bbUSA Today reported on Nov. 3, 2002, ‘In Georgia, an Atlanta Journal-Constitution poll shows Democratic Sen. Max Cleland with a 49% to 44% lead over Republican Rep. Saxby Chambliss.’ Cox News Service, based in Atlanta, reported just after the election (Nov. 7) that, ‘Pollsters may have goofed’ because ‘Republican Rep. Saxby Chambliss defeated incumbent Democratic Sen. Max Cleland by a margin of 53 to 46 percent. The Hotline, a political news service, recalled a series of polls Wednesday showing that Chambliss had been ahead in none of them.\u00a0\u00bb’ Nearly every vote in the state was on an electronic machine with no audit trail.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIn the years since those first articles appeared, Bev Harris has published her book on the subject (\u00a0\u00bbBlack Box Voting\u00a0\u00bb), including the revelation of her finding the notorious \u00a0\u00bbRob Georgia\u00a0\u00bb folder on Diebold’s FTP site just after Cleland’s loss there; Lynn Landes has done some groundbreaking research, particularly her new investigation of the Associated Press, as have Rebecca Mercuri and David Dill. There’s a new video out on the topic, Votergate, available at votergate.tv.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCongressman Rush Holt introduced a bill into Congress requiring a voter-verified paper ballot be produced by all electronic voting machines, and it’s been co-sponsored by a majority of the members of the House of Representatives. The two-year battle fought by Dennis Hastert and Tom DeLay to keep it from coming to a vote, thus insuring that there will be no possible audit of the votes of about a third of the 2004 electorate, has fueled the flames of conspiracy theorists convinced Republican ideologues now known to be willing to lie in television advertising would extend their \u00a0\u00bbends justifies the means\u00a0\u00bb morality to stealing the vote \u00a0\u00bbfor the better good of the country\u00a0\u00bb they think single-party Republican rule will bring.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tMost important, though, the rallying cry of the emerging \u00a0\u00bbhonest vote\u00a0\u00bb movement must become: Get Corporations Out Of Our Vote!<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tWhy have we let corporations into our polling places, locations so sacred to democracy that in many states even international election monitors and reporters are banned? Why are we allowing corporations to exclusively handle our vote, in a secret and totally invisible way? Particularly a private corporation founded, in one case, by a family that believes the Bible should replace the Constitution; in another case run by one of Ohio’s top Republicans; and in another case partly owned by Saudi investors?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOf all the violations of the commons all of the crimes against We The People and against democracy in our great and historic republic this is the greatest. Our vote is too important to outsource to private corporations.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIt’s time that the U.S.A. like most of the rest of the world returns to paper ballots, counted by hand by civil servants (our employees) under the watchful eye of the party faithful. Even if it takes two weeks to count the vote, and we have to just go, until then, with the exit polls of the news agencies. It worked just fine for nearly 200 years in the U.S.A., and it can work again.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tWhen I lived in Germany, they took the vote the same way most of the world does people fill in hand-marked ballots, which are hand-counted by civil servants taking a week off from their regular jobs, watched over by volunteer representatives of the political parties. It’s totally clean, and easily audited. And even though it takes a week or more to count the vote (and costs nothing more than a bit of overtime pay for civil servants), the German people know the election results the night the polls close because the news media’s exit polls, for two generations, have never been more than a tenth of a percent off.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tWe could have saved billions that have instead been handed over to ES&S, Diebold, and other private corporations.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOr, if we must have machines, let’s have them owned by local governments, maintained and programmed by civil servants answerable to We The People, using open-source code and disconnected from modems, that produce a voter-verified printed ballot, with all results published on a precinct-by-precinct basis.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAs Thomas Paine wrote at this nation’s founding, \u00a0\u00bbThe right of voting for representatives is the primary right by which all other rights are protected. To take away this right is to reduce a man to slavery.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOnly when We The People reclaim the commons of our vote can we again be confident in the integrity of our electoral process in the world’s oldest and most powerful democratic republic. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tThom Hartmann is a Project Censored Award-winning best-selling author and host of a nationally syndicated daily progressive talk show. His most recent books are \u00a0\u00bbThe Last Hours of Ancient Sunlight,\u00a0\u00bb \u00a0\u00bbUnequal Protection: The Rise of Corporate Dominance and the Theft of Human Rights,\u00a0\u00bb \u00a0\u00bbWe The People: A Call To Take Back America,\u00a0\u00bb and \u00a0\u00bbWhat Would Jefferson Do?: A Return To Democracy.\u00a0\u00bb<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t[Notre recommandation est que ce texte doit \u00eatre lu avec la mention classique \u00e0 l’esprit, Disclaimer: In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only..]<\/em><\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Kerry Won…<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tBy Greg Palast, TomPain.com, November 04, 2004<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBush won Ohio by 136,483 votes. In the United States, about 3 percent of votes cast are voidedknown as spoilage in election jargonbecause the ballots cast are inconclusive. Drawing on what happened in Florida and studies of elections past, Palast argues that if Ohio’s discarded ballots were counted, Kerry would have won the state. Today, the Cleveland Plain Dealer reports there are a total of 247,672 votes not counted in Ohio, if you add the 92,672 discarded votes plus the 155,000 provisional ballots. So far there’s no indication that Palast’s hypothesis will be tested because only the provisional ballots are being counted.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tGreg Palast, contributing editor to Harper’s magazine, investigated the manipulation of the vote for BBC Television’s Newsnight. The documentary, \u00a0\u00bbBush Family Fortunes,\u00a0\u00bb based on his New York Times bestseller, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, has been released this month on DVD .<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tKerry won. Here are the facts.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tI know you don’t want to hear it. You can’t face one more hung chad. But I don’t have a choice. As a journalist examining that messy sausage called American democracy, it’s my job to tell you who got the most votes in the deciding states. Tuesday, in Ohio and New Mexico, it was John Kerry.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tMost voters in Ohio thought they were voting for Kerry. At 1:05 a.m. Wednesday morning, CNN’s exit poll showed Kerry beating Bush among Ohio women by 53 percent to 47 percent. The exit polls were later combined withand therefore contaminated bythe tabulated results, ultimately becoming a mirror of the apparent actual vote. [To read about the skewing of exit polls to conform to official results, click here .] Kerry also defeated Bush among Ohio’s male voters 51 percent to 49 percent. Unless a third gender voted in Ohio, Kerry took the state.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSo what’s going on here? Answer: the exit polls are accurate. Pollsters ask, \u00a0\u00bbWho did you vote for?\u00a0\u00bb Unfortunately, they don’t ask the crucial, question, \u00a0\u00bbWas your vote counted?\u00a0\u00bb The voters don’t know.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tHere’s why. Although the exit polls show that most voters in Ohio punched cards for Kerry-Edwards, thousands of these votes were simply not recorded. This was predictable and it was predicted. [See TomPaine.com, \u00a0\u00bbAn Election Spoiled Rotten,\u00a0\u00bb November 1<\/a>.] <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOnce again, at the heart of the Ohio uncounted vote game are, I’m sorry to report, hanging chads and pregnant chads, plus some other ballot tricks old and new.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tThe election in Ohio was not decided by the voters but by something called \u00a0\u00bbspoilage.\u00a0\u00bb Typically in the United States, about 3 percent of the vote is voided, just thrown away, not recorded. When the bobble-head boobs on the tube tell you Ohio or any state was won by 51 percent to 49 percent, don’t you believe it … it has never happened in the United States, because the total never reaches a neat 100 percent. The television totals simply subtract out the spoiled vote.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tWhose Votes Are Discarded?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAnd not all votes spoil equally. Most of those votes, say every official report, come from African-American and minority precincts. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tWe saw this in Florida in 2000. Exit polls showed Gore with a plurality of at least 50,000, but it didn’t match the official count. That’s because the official, Secretary of State Katherine Harris, excluded 179,855 spoiled votes. In Florida, as in Ohio, most of these votes lost were cast on punch cards where the hole wasn’t punched through completelyleaving a ‘hanging chad,’or was punched extra times. Whose cards were discarded? Expert statisticians investigating spoilage for the government calculated that 54 percent of the ballots thrown in the dumpster were cast by black folks.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAnd here’s the key: Florida is terribly typical. The majority of ballots thrown out (there will be nearly 2 million tossed out from Tuesday’s election) will have been cast by African American and other minority citizens.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSo here we go again. Or, here we don’t go again. Because unlike last time, Democrats aren’t even asking Ohio to count these cards with the not-quite-punched holes (called \u00a0\u00bbundervotes\u00a0\u00bb in the voting biz). Nor are they demanding we look at the \u00a0\u00bbovervotes\u00a0\u00bb where voter intent may be discerned.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOhio is one of the last states in America to still use the vote-spoiling punch-card machines. And the Secretary of State of Ohio, J. Kenneth Blackwell, wrote before the election, the possibility of a close election with punch cards as the state’s primary voting device invites a Florida-like calamity.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBut this week, Blackwell, a rabidly partisan Republican, has warmed up to the result of sticking with machines that have a habit of eating Democratic votes. When asked if he feared being this year’s Katherine Harris, Blackwell noted that Ms. Fix-it’s efforts landed her a seat in Congress.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tExactly how many votes were lost to spoilage this time? Blackwell’s office, notably, won’t say, though the law requires it be reported. Hmm. But we know that last time, the total of Ohio votes discarded reached a democracy-damaging 1.96 percent. The machines produced their typical lossthat’s 110,000 votesoverwhelmingly Democratic.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tThe Impact Of Challenges<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tFirst and foremost, Kerry was had by chads. But the Democrat wasn’t punched out by punch cards alone. There were also the ‘challenges.’ That’s a polite word for the Republican Party of Ohio’s use of an old Ku Klux Klan technique: the attempt to block thousands of voters of color at the polls. In Ohio, Wisconsin and Florida, the GOP laid plans for poll workers to ambush citizens under arcane lawsalmost never usedallowing party-designated poll watchers to finger individual voters and demand they be denied a ballot. The Ohio courts were horrified and federal law prohibits targeting of voters where race is a factor in the challenge. But our Supreme Court was prepared to let Republicans stand in the voting booth door.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIn the end, the challenges were not overwhelming, but they were there. Many apparently resulted in voters getting these funky \u00a0\u00bbprovisional\u00a0\u00bb ballotsa kind of voting placebowhich may or may not be counted. Blackwell estimates there were 175,000; Democrats say 250,000. Pick your number. But as challenges were aimed at minorities, no one doubts these are, again, overwhelmingly Democratic. Count them up, add in the spoiled punch cards (easy to tally with the human eye in a recount), and the totals begin to match the exit polls; and, golly, you’ve got yourself a new president. Remember, Bush won by 136,483 votes in Ohio.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tEnchanted State’s Enchanted Vote<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tNow, on to New Mexico, where a Kerry pluralityif all votes are countedis more obvious still. Before the election, in TomPaine.com, I wrote, \u00a0\u00bbJohn Kerry is down by several thousand votes in New Mexico, though not one ballot has yet been counted.\u00a0\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tHow did that happen? It’s the spoilage, stupid; and the provisional ballots.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCNN said George Bush took New Mexico by 11,620 votes. Again, the network total added up to that miraculous, and non-existent, ‘100 percent’ of ballots cast.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tNew Mexico reported in the last race a spoilage rate of 2.68 percent, votes lost almost entirely in Hispanic, Native American and poor precinctsDemocratic turf. From Tuesday’s vote, assuming the same ballot-loss rate, we can expect to see 18,000 ballots in the spoilage bin.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSpoilage has a very Democratic look in New Mexico. Hispanic voters in the Enchanted State, who voted more than two to one for Kerry, are five times as likely to have their vote spoil as a white voter. Counting these uncounted votes would easily overtake the Bush ‘plurality.’<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAlready, the election-bending effects of spoilage are popping up in the election stats, exactly where we’d expect them: in heavily Hispanic areas controlled by Republican elections officials. Chaves County, in the \u00a0\u00bbLittle Texas\u00a0\u00bb area of New Mexico, has a 44 percent Hispanic population, plus African Americans and Native Americans, yet George Bush \u00a0\u00bbwon\u00a0\u00bb there 68 percent to 31 percent.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tI spoke with Chaves’ Republican county clerk before the election, and he told me that this huge spoilage rate among Hispanics simply indicated that such people simply can’t make up their minds on the choice of candidate for president. Oddly, these brown people drive across the desert to register their indecision in a voting booth.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tNow, let’s add in the effect on the New Mexico tally of provisional ballots.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00a0\u00bbThey were handing them out like candy,\u00a0\u00bb Albuquerque journalist Renee Blake reported of provisional ballots. About 20,000 were given out. Who got them?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSantiago Juarez who ran the \u00a0\u00bbFaithful Citizenship\u00a0\u00bb program for the Catholic Archdiocese in New Mexico, told me that \u00a0\u00bbhis\u00a0\u00bb voters, poor Hispanics, whom he identified as solid Kerry supporters, were handed the iffy provisional ballots. Hispanics were given provisional ballots, rather than the countable kind \u00a0\u00bbalmost religiously,\u00a0\u00bb he said, at polling stations when there was the least question about a voter’s identification. Some voters, Santiago said, were simply turned away.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tYour Kerry Victory Party<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSo we can call Ohio and New Mexico for John Kerryif we count all the votes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBut that won’t happen. Despite the Democratic Party’s pledge, the leadership this time gave in to racial disenfranchisement once again. Why? No doubt, the Democrats know darn well that counting all the spoiled and provisional ballots will require the cooperation of Ohio’s Secretary of State, Blackwell. He will ultimately decide which spoiled and provisional ballots get tallied. Blackwell, hankering to step into Kate Harris’ political pumps, is unlikely to permit anything close to a full count. Also, Democratic leadership knows darn well the media would punish the party for demanding a full count.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tWhat now? Kerry won, so hold your victory party. But make sure the shades are down: it may be become illegal to demand a full vote count under PATRIOT Act III.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tI used to write a column for the Guardian papers in London. Several friends have asked me if I will again leave the country. In light of the failurea second timeto count all the votes, that won’t be necessary. My country has left me.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t Greg Palast, contributing editor to Harper’s magazine, investigated the manipulation of the vote for BBC Television’s Newsnight. The documentary, \u00a0\u00bbBush Family Fortunes,\u00a0\u00bb based on his New York Times bestseller, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy, has been released this month on DVD.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t[Notre recommandation est que ce texte doit \u00eatre lu avec la mention classique \u00e0 l’esprit, Disclaimer: In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only..]<\/em><\/strong> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La th\u00e8se VoterGate commence \u00e0 se r\u00e9pandre : le 2 novembre 2004, the most massive election fraud in the history of the world? En fait de lecture d’un texte, c’est \u00e0 celle de deux textes comme amorce de beaucoup d’autres lectures que nous convions nos lecteurs. Cela concerne une hypoth\u00e8se qui commence \u00e0 \u00eatre d\u00e9velopp\u00e9e… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[4382,4380,4381],"class_list":["post-66121","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-notes-de-lectures","tag-hartmann","tag-palash","tag-tompaine-com"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66121","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66121"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66121\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66121"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66121"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66121"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}