Partout et toujours, lorsqu’il s’agit de l’univers postmoderne et sp\u00e9cialement des Am\u00e9ricains qui en sont \u00e0 la fois les cr\u00e9ateurs et les premi\u00e8res victimes, cette m\u00eame rengaine caract\u00e9ristique du virtualisme: \u00ab\u00a0d\u00e9connexion\u00a0\u00bb. Notre \u00e9poque est celle de la rupture des liens qui tiennent ensemble les \u00e9l\u00e9ments constituants de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, d’une pens\u00e9e, d’une perception, d’une psychologie, etc. A la place, on voit se mettre en place des st\u00e9r\u00e9otypes reconstitu\u00e9s, souvent reflets de personnages ou de situations qui sont pr\u00e9sent\u00e9s dans les films les plus primaires, les s\u00e9ries de t\u00e9l\u00e9vision, etc. Le travail de la communication est d\u00e9cisivement favoris\u00e9 par la rupture de l’int\u00e9gration des composants des situations, des caract\u00e8res, etc., pour offrir un nouveau mod\u00e8le \u00e0 la personne concern\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Lisez ce t\u00e9moignage d’un soldat am\u00e9ricain venu d’Irak, devenu objecteur de conscience, pass\u00e9 dans l’opposition activiste \u00e0 la guerre et lanc\u00e9 dans des tourn\u00e9es de conf\u00e9rences et de s\u00e9ances d’information pour communiquer son t\u00e9moignage sur les crimes de guerre impunis, ignor\u00e9s du grand public, pass\u00e9s compl\u00e8tement inaper\u00e7us. Il s’agit de Aiden Delgado, un r\u00e9serviste de l’U.S. Army, en Irak d’avril 2003 \u00e0 avril 2004 dans la 320th Military Police Company. Il est interview\u00e9, le 1er avril 2005, par Paul Rockwell sur Online Journal<\/a>. Il rapporte ici son exp\u00e9rience d’un incident \u00e0 la prison d’Abu Ghraib, où son unit\u00e9 \u00e9tait stationn\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n DELGADO: <\/strong><\/em>« The worst incident that I was privy to was in late November <\/em>[2003]. The prisoners were protesting nightly because of their living conditions. They protested the cold, the lack of clothing, the rotting food that was causing dysentery. And they wanted cigarettes. They tore up pieces of clothing, made banners and signs. One demonstration became intense and got unruly. The prisoners picked up stones, pieces of wood, and threw them at the guards. One of my buddies got hit in the face. He got a bloody nose. But he wasn’t hurt. The guards asked permission to use lethal force. They got it. They opened fire on the prisoners with the machine guns. They shot twelve and killed three. I know because I talked to the guy who did the killing. He showed me these grisly photographs, and he bragged about the results. \u00ab\u00a0Oh,\u00a0\u00bb he said, \u00ab\u00a0I shot this guy in the face. See, his head is split open.\u00a0\u00bb He talked like the Terminator. \u00ab\u00a0I shot this guy in the groin, he took three days to bleed to death.\u00a0\u00bb I was shocked. This was the nicest guy you would ever want to meet. He was a family man, a really courteous guy, a devout Christian. I was stunned and said to him: \u00ab\u00a0You shot an unarmed man behind barbed wire for throwing a stone.\u00a0\u00bb He said, \u00ab\u00a0Well, I knelt down. I said a prayer, stood up and gunned them all down.\u00a0\u00bb There was a complete disconnect between what he had done and his own morality.<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n L’essentiel du constat qu’on propose ici se trouve dans ces deux phrases:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n « He talked like the Terminator. <\/em>[…] There was a complete disconnect between what he had done and his own morality.<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/p>\n Mis en ligne le 4 avril 2005 \u00e0 16H28<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Rupture de l’int\u00e9gration, outil du virtualisme Partout et toujours, lorsqu’il s’agit de l’univers postmoderne et sp\u00e9cialement des Am\u00e9ricains qui en sont \u00e0 la fois les cr\u00e9ateurs et les premi\u00e8res victimes, cette m\u00eame rengaine caract\u00e9ristique du virtualisme: \u00ab\u00a0d\u00e9connexion\u00a0\u00bb. Notre \u00e9poque est celle de la rupture des liens qui tiennent ensemble les \u00e9l\u00e9ments constituants de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3289,4487,857,4486,2671],"class_list":["post-66293","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-army","tag-delgado","tag-irak","tag-terminator","tag-us"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66293","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66293"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66293\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n