Contrairement \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sentation qui en est faite g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement, les USA sont aujourd’hui un syst\u00e8me bureaucratique total, jusqu’\u00e0 l’absurde des situations et des interpr\u00e9tations. L’effet est encore plus saisissant qu’avec l’URSS, car les Am\u00e9ricains apportent aux manifestations de ce syst\u00e8me bureaucratique leur minutie juridique et leur pr\u00e9cision des proc\u00e9dures. Cela implique que tous les actes, situations, etc., tributaires du fonctionnement du syst\u00e8me doivent \u00eatre justifi\u00e9s bureaucratiquement, c’est-\u00e0-dire selon les r\u00e8gles conformes au fonctionnement de cette bureaucratie.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tLe cas de la mort du capitaine Calipari, du renseignement italien, et de la blessure de la journaliste italienne qu’il venait de lib\u00e9rer de ses ravisseurs, est particuli\u00e8rement \u00e9clairant. La version US, contre nombre d’\u00e9vidences qui lui furent oppos\u00e9es, est impeccablement vertueuse : ce fut un accident malheureux, survenu \u00e0 un point de contr\u00f4le normal de l’U.S. Army pacificatrice de l’Irak, et plut\u00f4t avec la suggestion que la voiture de Calipari et de Sgrena \u00e9tait nettement en faute par rapport \u00e0 ces proc\u00e9dures. Ces Europ\u00e9ens sont incontr\u00f4lables.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tCette version devait \u00eatre expos\u00e9e avec la plus grande pr\u00e9cision possible, et avec une r\u00e9f\u00e9rence impeccable aux r\u00e8glements bureaucratiques en rigueur. Lors de l’enqu\u00eate qui a eu lieu au sein de l’U.S. Army, et qui a \u00e9videmment abouti au triomphe de la th\u00e8se officielle et de la compl\u00e8te conformit\u00e9 du comportement des soldats, tout a \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9tabli selon la plus grande pr\u00e9cision. Le r\u00e9sultat de cette d\u00e9marche bureaucratique est la satisfaction des normes bureaucratiques, l’affirmation officielle de la vertu de l’U.S. Army, le triomphe de l’Am\u00e9rique d\u00e9mocratique et la plus compl\u00e8te et grossi\u00e8re absurdit\u00e9 par rapport au bon sens.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tL’auteur Eli Stephens (auteur du livre Left I on the News<\/em>) a men\u00e9 sa propre enqu\u00eate qui est une simple le\u00e7on de math\u00e9matique. Le r\u00e9sultat est \u00e9tonnant. Les r\u00e8gles et proc\u00e9dures bureaucratiques, ainsi que les proc\u00e9dures d’engagement de l’U.S. Army sont respect\u00e9es dans l’incident reconstitu\u00e9 par le Pentagone. Le sc\u00e9nario est conforme \u00e0 la version initiale oppos\u00e9e aux Italiens. Donc, tout est parfait Ah oui, on oubliait : reste la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, et elle est situ\u00e9e quelque part entre grotesque et absurde. (Le texte de Eli Stephens, A Math Lesson<\/em>, a \u00e9t\u00e9 publi\u00e9 le 18 avril sur le site de CounterPunch<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab It was reported a few days ago:<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb U.S. soldiers reportedly have been cleared of wrongdoing in the shooting of an Italian journalist and an intelligence agent last month in Baghdad.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb The car was about 130 yards from a checkpoint when the soldiers flashed their lights to get it to stop. They fired warning shots when the car was within 90 yards of the checkpoint, but at 65 yards, they used deadly force. Calipari was killed and Sgrena wounded.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb Sgrena has told CBS that the car she was in was going 30 mph. At 30 mph, a car is going 15 yards per second. So, according to the U.S. military, they fired warning shots within 2.7 seconds of flashing a warning light, and used deadly force 2.3 seconds after that. And actually, if the U.S. military story were true and the car were really travelling at high speed, let’s be generous and call that only 45 mph, that’s 22 yards per second, meaning 1.8 seconds between warning lights and warning shots, and 1.6 seconds between warning shots and deadly shots.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb Now, there are variables, but typical perception plus reaction times are of the order of 1.5 seconds, that is, the time it takes to perceive a problem (such as a warning signal) and move your foot to the brake. That means that, according to the military’s story, shots were fired at the vehicle less than 0.3 seconds after the vehicle could possibly have begun to slow down, even if they were paying close attention and they had immediately perceived that the alleged flashing light was meant as a signal to stop.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb However that 0.3 second is actually overstated, because the gunman (or gunmen), attempting to perceive if the car was responding to their warning signal to slow down, have perception and reaction times of their own, so in fact, they were pulling the trigger before they could possibly have perceived if the car were slowing down. And likewise, if the so-called warning shots were supposed to have served any purpose whatsoever, once again the deadly force shots were being squeezed off well before the warning shots could possibly have had any effect.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb And on that basis, the military has \u00a0\u00bbexonerated itself\u00a0\u00bb from any wrongdoing.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 20 avril 2005 \u00e0 19H05<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Contrairement \u00e0 la pr\u00e9sentation qui en est faite g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement, les USA sont aujourd’hui un syst\u00e8me bureaucratique total, jusqu’\u00e0 l’absurde des situations et des interpr\u00e9tations. L’effet est encore plus saisissant qu’avec l’URSS, car les Am\u00e9ricains apportent aux manifestations de ce syst\u00e8me bureaucratique leur minutie juridique et leur pr\u00e9cision des proc\u00e9dures. Cela implique que tous les actes,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66343","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66343","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66343"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66343\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66343"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66343"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66343"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}