{"id":66372,"date":"2005-05-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-05-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/05\/01\/rummy-meets-saddam\/"},"modified":"2005-05-01T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-05-01T00:00:00","slug":"rummy-meets-saddam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/05\/01\/rummy-meets-saddam\/","title":{"rendered":"Rummy meets Saddam"},"content":{"rendered":"

Plusieurs sources ont annonc\u00e9 le 28 avril que Donald Rumsfeld avait secr\u00e8tement rencontr\u00e9 Saddam Hussein lors de sa derni\u00e8re visite en Irak. C’est une note du site xymphora.blogspot.com<\/a>, du 30 avril, qui a attir\u00e9 notre attention (avec ce commentaire, qui nous para\u00eet appropri\u00e9: \u00ab This is just crazy enough to be true<\/em> \u00bb). Xymphora<\/em> renvoie \u00e0 ses sources. Le site uruknet.info<\/a>, avait repris la nouvelle, notamment \u00e0 partir du site de l’agence de presse turque Anadolu News Agency<\/a>. Il y est notamment \u00e9crit ceci :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab According to a news article based on Iraqi Baath sources in Jordan published in the London based Al-Quds Al-Arabi newspaper, Rumsfeld met with Saddam in his cell in Bagdat (Baghdad) and the US Secretary of Defense asked Saddam to end the insurgence. The paper claims that Rumsfeld asked him on a television broadcast to make a call for insurgents to end the resistence against US and multi-national forces as well as the Iraqi security forces.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Rumsfeld in return offered a release and exile of the administrators of the overthrown Iraqi regime or those who are willing to be involved in the government after negotiations.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Baath sources in Jordan have reported that Saddam refused the offer.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLa visite en Irak au cours de laquelle aurait eu lieu la rencontre date du 14 avril<\/a>, et Rumsfeld y d\u00e9clarait notamment \u00e0 propos de la situation en Irak: \u00ab We’re getting better and more efficient at it.<\/em> \u00bb Il est \u00e0 noter \u00e9galement qu’en trois mois, Rumsfeld a effectu\u00e9 deux visites en Irak.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe commentaire nous appara\u00eet \u00e0 la fois \u00e9vident et attristant:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t• Il nous appara\u00eet qu’il y a une possibilit\u00e9 assez grande que la chose soit vraie, au point qu’on doive parler de probabilit\u00e9. Il n’y a eu aucun d\u00e9menti et les pr\u00e9cisions donn\u00e9es sont acceptables. R\u00e9p\u00e9tons que le commentaire de Xymphora<\/em> est exactement appropri\u00e9 : la situation est si compl\u00e8tement surr\u00e9aliste qu’une telle initiative a tout son sens (?).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t• Bien entendu, une telle visite et une telle proposition seraient une marque de plus de la gravit\u00e9 de la situation inextricable o\u00f9 se trouvent les Am\u00e9ricains aujourd’hui.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t• Compar\u00e9es au d\u00e9luge d’informations depuis trois ans sur la diabolisation de Saddam, et depuis trois mois sur l’am\u00e9lioration de la situation en Irak, une telle visite et une telle proposition en diraient long sur le degr\u00e9 de perversion du pouvoir am\u00e9ricaniste, autant conscient qu’inconscient, autant par l’usage du mensonge que par l’ignorance de cet oc\u00e9an de mensonges dans le cours des actes politiques.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 1er avril 2005 \u00e0 06H15<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Plusieurs sources ont annonc\u00e9 le 28 avril que Donald Rumsfeld avait secr\u00e8tement rencontr\u00e9 Saddam Hussein lors de sa derni\u00e8re visite en Irak. C’est une note du site xymphora.blogspot.com, du 30 avril, qui a attir\u00e9 notre attention (avec ce commentaire, qui nous para\u00eet appropri\u00e9: \u00ab This is just crazy enough to be true \u00bb). Xymphora renvoie… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[569],"class_list":["post-66372","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-rumsfeld"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66372","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66372"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66372\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66372"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66372"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66372"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}