{"id":66379,"date":"2005-05-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-05-03T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/05\/03\/la-symphonie-du-ddx\/"},"modified":"2005-05-03T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-05-03T00:00:00","slug":"la-symphonie-du-ddx","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/05\/03\/la-symphonie-du-ddx\/","title":{"rendered":"La symphonie du DD(X)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Lisez ces titres et sous-titres d&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.defensenews.com\/story.php?F=817932&#038;C=thisweek\" class=\"gen\">un article de Defense News du 2 mai 2005<\/a>, et peut-\u00eatre vous donneront-ils l&rsquo;impression que nous entrons dans la maison des fous : \u00ab <em>Rising Costs of DD(X) Threatens U.S. Fleet Plans<\/em> \u00bb (en fait, le mot <em>Plans<\/em> est inutile), puis : \u00ab <em>What if DD(X) dies of its own fiscal weight?<\/em> \u00bb (en fait, on pr\u00e9f\u00e9rerait <em>sinks<\/em> que <em>dies<\/em>).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe programme DD(X) est devenu la nouvelle star du Pentagone, aux c\u00f4t\u00e9s du bombardier B-2 \u00e0 $2,4 milliards l&rsquo;unit\u00e9 (estimation modique), du chasseur F\/A-22 \u00e0 $347 millions l&rsquo;unit\u00e9 (pour l&rsquo;instant). Rapidement dit pour rappeler les conditions de d\u00e9part: le programme DD(X) avait \u00e9t\u00e9 con\u00e7u \u00ab <em>&#8230;in the 1990s as a $700 million antidote to the rising costs of surface warships<\/em> \u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDonc, $700 millions le destroyer en 1996 (prix confirm\u00e9 et tenu pour ferme \u00e0 cette \u00e9poque). Aujourd&rsquo;hui, on affiche $3,3 milliards  mais la Navy, dont le pass\u00e9 en la mati\u00e8re donne confiance, vous affirme qu&rsquo;on pourrait descendre \u00e0 $2,2 milliards \u00e0 la cinqui\u00e8me ou sixi\u00e8me unit\u00e9. Nous, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=1502\" class=\"gen\">nous mentionnions plus de $4 milliards<\/a>. Juste mais pas assez audacieux. <em>Defense News<\/em> note sobrement, et nous traduisons pour l&rsquo;occasion, qu&rsquo; \u00ab <em>en priv\u00e9, des officiels du DoD et de l&rsquo;industrie disent que la premi\u00e8re unit\u00e9 pourrait co\u00fbter entre $4 et $7 milliards<\/em> \u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAvec un peu de chance (?), on pourrait donc atteindre et d\u00e9passer une augmentation de 1000% du prix d&rsquo;un destroyer DD(X) destin\u00e9 \u00e0 r\u00e9duire les co\u00fbts de la flotte en un peu moins de 10 ans. Ou bien, sauter \u00e0 la mer, \u00e0 la recherche d&rsquo;un poisson qui pourrait faire office de DD(X). (\u00ab <em>They&rsquo;re going to be blown out of the water if they don&rsquo;t have a backup<\/em> \u00bb, dit un analyste, des amiraux qui soutiennent le DD(X) jusqu&rsquo;au bout.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 2 mai 2005 \u00e0 07H15<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Lisez ces titres et sous-titres d&rsquo;un article de Defense News du 2 mai 2005, et peut-\u00eatre vous donneront-ils l&rsquo;impression que nous entrons dans la maison des fous : \u00ab Rising Costs of DD(X) Threatens U.S. Fleet Plans \u00bb (en fait, le mot Plans est inutile), puis : \u00ab What if DD(X) dies of its own&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66379","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66379","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66379"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66379\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66379"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66379"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66379"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}