{"id":66396,"date":"2005-05-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-05-08T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/05\/08\/la-lecon-dhistoire-de-gw\/"},"modified":"2005-05-08T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-05-08T00:00:00","slug":"la-lecon-dhistoire-de-gw","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/05\/08\/la-lecon-dhistoire-de-gw\/","title":{"rendered":"La le\u00e7on d’histoire de GW"},"content":{"rendered":"

Des aspects importants du discours de GW Bush le 7 mai, \u00e0 l’occasion du 60\u00e8me anniversaire de la fin de la Deuxi\u00e8me Guerre mondiale, repr\u00e9sentent une tentative puissante de la part des r\u00e9publicains am\u00e9ricains de r\u00e9gler un compte historique avec Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Dans ce discours, Bush condamne en des termes sans \u00e9quivoque la politique de Yalta.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAP \u00e9crivait hier<\/a> \u00e0 propos de ce discours:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab President Bush said Saturday the Soviet domination of central and eastern Europe after World War II will be remembered as one of the greatest wrongs of history and acknowledged that the United States played a significant role in the division of the continent.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Bush said the agreement in 1945 at Yalta among President Franklin D. Roosevelt, Soviet leader Josef Stalin and British Prime Minister Winston Churchill followed in the unjust tradition of Munich and the Molotov-Ribbontrop pact. The decisions at Yalta led to the Soviet annexation and occupation of the Baltic countries for nearly half a century.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Once again, when powerful governments negotiated, the freedom of small nations was somehow expendable, the president said, opening a four-nation trip to mark the 60th anniversary of Nazi Germany’s defeat. Yet this attempt to sacrifice freedom for the sake of stability left a continent divided and unstable. We will not repeat the mistakes of other generations appeasing or excusing tyranny, and sacrificing freedom in the vain pursuit of stability.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe discours a \u00e9t\u00e9 prononc\u00e9 \u00e0 Riga, au coeur de ces pays baltes qui repr\u00e9sentent le clan le plus extr\u00e9miste en Europe, \u00e0 la fois anti-russe et pro-am\u00e9ricain. Il appuie \u00e9videmment la tendance dure de ces pays et accentue le travers qu’il d\u00e9nonce avec Yalta : une division de l’Europe de l’UE entre pays mod\u00e9r\u00e9s et responsables, partisans de bonnes relations avec la Russie, et pays extr\u00e9mistes et irresponsables, partisans d’une politique anti-russe dure.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDu point de vue des r\u00e9f\u00e9rences, le discours illustre clairement une approche r\u00e9publicaine et conservatrice plus qu’une approche n\u00e9o-conservatrice, puisqu’il implique dans sa condamnation de Yalta aussi bien Winston Churchill que FDR (Churchill est le h\u00e9ros incontest\u00e9 et la r\u00e9f\u00e9rence de l’action des n\u00e9o-conservateurs).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 8 mai 2004 \u00e0 12H10<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Des aspects importants du discours de GW Bush le 7 mai, \u00e0 l’occasion du 60\u00e8me anniversaire de la fin de la Deuxi\u00e8me Guerre mondiale, repr\u00e9sentent une tentative puissante de la part des r\u00e9publicains am\u00e9ricains de r\u00e9gler un compte historique avec Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Dans ce discours, Bush condamne en des termes sans \u00e9quivoque la politique… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66396","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66396","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66396"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66396\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}