The Tories gained 50,000 more votes than Labour in England but got 92 fewer English seats. The Liberal Democrats said if the number of votes cast reflected the number of seats in Parliament they would have more than doubled their number of seats from 62 to 141. Lord Lester of Herne Hill, the Liberal Democrat peer, said the system means one party can wield absolute power without a clear majority of votes.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLa r\u00e9forme du syst\u00e8me \u00e9lectoral du Royaume-Uni: un cas de n\u00e9cessaire et tr\u00e8s rapide r\u00e9forme, sous peine de risquer des accidents graves, des usurpations de pouvoir, et de voir le syst\u00e8me encore plus discr\u00e9dit\u00e9, voire totalement d\u00e9l\u00e9gitim\u00e9. Mais comment parvenir \u00e0 une r\u00e9forme \u00e9lectorale \u00e9quitable, qui soit accept\u00e9e par tous, alors que ce m\u00eame monde politique britannique est en crise, que le parti au pouvoir, qui a perdu de sa l\u00e9gitimit\u00e9, soutient \u00e0 peine un gouvernement d\u00e9chir\u00e9 entre Brown et Blair, qu’une fraction importante de la repr\u00e9sentation parlementaire (entre 40 et 60 d\u00e9put\u00e9s selon les probl\u00e8mes, ce qui ferait basculer la majorit\u00e9) menace de ne pas voter certains textes, voire de retirer son soutien au gouvernement?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 10 mai 2005 \u00e0 10H45<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Les \u00e9lections du 5 mai 2005 au Royaume-Uni ont \u00e9t\u00e9 un \u00e9v\u00e9nement important et pr\u00e9occupant pour plusieurs raisons. Peut-\u00eatre celle-ci est-elle la plus importante, parce que la plus pr\u00e9occupante : les limites du syst\u00e8me \u00e9lectoral, voire les effets pervers politiques de ce syst\u00e8me, en un mot, la crise du syst\u00e8me politique britannique. Les avertissements et… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66403","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66403","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66403"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66403\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66403"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66403"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66403"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}