{"id":66441,"date":"2005-05-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-05-24T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/05\/24\/sur-ordre-de-gw-karzai-est-content\/"},"modified":"2005-05-24T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-05-24T00:00:00","slug":"sur-ordre-de-gw-karzai-est-content","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/05\/24\/sur-ordre-de-gw-karzai-est-content\/","title":{"rendered":"Sur ordre de GW, Karza\u00ef est content"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La com\u00e9die continue selon le livret. Karza\u00ef a vu GW \u00e0 Washington, tout s&rsquo;est bien pass\u00e9, Karza\u00ef a expos\u00e9 ses probl\u00e8mes et GW a confirm\u00e9 que les troupes US en Afghanistan resteraient \u00e9videmment sous contr\u00f4le US (qui a pu penser le contraire?) et qu&rsquo;elles y feraient ce qu&rsquo;elles voudraient parce que ce qu&rsquo;elles y font est bien. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa rencontre, hier 23 mai, telle que <a href=\"http:\/\/news.independent.co.uk\/world\/asia\/story.jsp?story=640939\" class=\"gen\">rapport\u00e9e par The Independent<\/a>, a \u00e9t\u00e9 un moment d&rsquo;intense et sinistre ironie, si l&rsquo;on consid\u00e8re ce que Karza\u00ef nous avait dit <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=1574\" class=\"gen\">du caract\u00e8re quasiment insupportable pour lui<\/a> du comportement des forces US en Afghanistan, et de l&rsquo;exigence qu&rsquo;il exposerait \u00e0 Washington d&rsquo;assurer le contr\u00f4le des op\u00e9rations militaires US dans le pays.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tContrairement \u00e0 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsws.org\/articles\/2005\/may2005\/afgh-m24.shtml\" class=\"gen\">l&rsquo;analyse que nous donne WSWS.org<\/a>, nous pensons que Karza\u00ef n&rsquo;a pas jou\u00e9 l&rsquo;indignation avant son d\u00e9part pour Washington. Nous dirions plut\u00f4t qu&rsquo;il joue de plus en plus serr\u00e9, entre ses ma\u00eetres am\u00e9ricanistes auxquels il doit ob\u00e9issance, et les pressions internes qui ne font que se renforcer et vont finir par menacer sa position autant que la soi-disant stabilit\u00e9 du pays. Karza\u00ef n&rsquo;est aujourd&rsquo;hui pas en meilleure position que ne l&rsquo;\u00e9tait, pendant les ann\u00e9es 1980, le pr\u00e9sident afghan Babrak Karmal plac\u00e9 \u00e0 la t\u00eate du pays le 27 d\u00e9cembre 1979 par les <em>Spetznatz<\/em> et les troupes sp\u00e9ciales du KGB.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 24 mai 2005 \u00e0 13H30<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La com\u00e9die continue selon le livret. Karza\u00ef a vu GW \u00e0 Washington, tout s&rsquo;est bien pass\u00e9, Karza\u00ef a expos\u00e9 ses probl\u00e8mes et GW a confirm\u00e9 que les troupes US en Afghanistan resteraient \u00e9videmment sous contr\u00f4le US (qui a pu penser le contraire?) et qu&rsquo;elles y feraient ce qu&rsquo;elles voudraient parce que ce qu&rsquo;elles y font&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66441","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66441","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66441"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66441\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}