A lire absolument, une tonitruante interview de George Galloway, le d\u00e9put\u00e9 britannique fameux depuis son audition au S\u00e9nat des Etats-Unis<\/a> le 17 mai dernier. (La popularit\u00e9 de Galloway aux USA \u00e0 la suite de son audition se mesure au courrier \u00e9lectronique qu’il a re\u00e7u, selon ses affirmations: plus de 12.000 messages.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tGalloway r\u00e9pond aux questions de Thom Hartmann<\/a>, autre dissident fameux aux USA. (Hartmann s’est notamment sp\u00e9cialis\u00e9 dans les recherches sur les fraudes \u00e9lectorales lors de l’\u00e9lection pr\u00e9sidentielle de 2004<\/a>. Il en parle lors de son interview de Galloway, les deux hommes comparant les pratiques respectives des fraudes \u00e9lectorales par les autorit\u00e9s en place, dans leurs pays respectifs.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tL’interview est diversifi\u00e9e et aborde plusieurs sujets. On lira notamment le jugement de Galloway sur les raisons qui ont pouss\u00e9 Tony Blair \u00e0 partir en guerre aux c\u00f4t\u00e9s de GW (\u00ab All I can say from my own conversations with Mr. Blair, man to man, are that I think that both him and George W. Bush are possessed of a kind of messianic belief that somebody, God perhaps, gave them the job of shouldering the white man’s burden, which is the world.<\/em> \u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tIl faut lire \u00e9galement quelques pr\u00e9cisions de Galloway sur l’\u00e9tat des privatisations au Royaume-Uni, celle des chemins de fer, bien connu, mais aussi celle, moins connue, des contr\u00f4leurs du trafic a\u00e9rien. Enfin, nous publions ci-dessous les quelques mots d’explications de Galloway sur la disparition, dans les 24 heures, du texte de son t\u00e9moignage sur le site du S\u00e9nat des Etats-Unis, o\u00f9 les archives des interventions sont disponibles. C’est une d\u00e9cision assez inhabituelle pour \u00eatre signal\u00e9e avec insistance. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tThom Hartmann First of all, Senator Norman Coleman, whose committee you testified before and to whom you spoke the week before last, as I recall, or last week recently. There are reports, which I’ve been unable to absolutely confirm, but apparently, from the searches of the senate web site, it looks like your testimony has disappeared from the record.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tGeorge Galloway That’s right.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tThom Hartmann Do you know about that, and what are your thoughts on that?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tGeorge Galloway It has been. It has been. It has been airbrushed from the, from the record. And in a way, if you saw the testimony, you’ll know why. Because what I managed to do, and I thank God for the breath that he gave me to do it, was blow away the smokescreen that these people are trying to throw up to divert attention from the very real crimes, high crimes and misdemeanors that they themselves are responsible for. And I’ve had, and I’m not exaggerating this, more than 12,000 emails from the United States. 12,000 emails, and it’s not easy in the United States to find out the email address of a British parliamentarian.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tThom Hartmann Yeah.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tGeorge Galloway And these people have all written to me. Many of them have drawn attention to the fact that although for one day, just 24 hours, my testimony was on the web site it has now been wiped off it. And that tells you all you need to know, really, about the quality of the commitment to democracy and open government that these people really have as opposed to the talk that they talk.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 29 mai 2005 \u00e0 07H00<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A lire absolument, une tonitruante interview de George Galloway, le d\u00e9put\u00e9 britannique fameux depuis son audition au S\u00e9nat des Etats-Unis le 17 mai dernier. (La popularit\u00e9 de Galloway aux USA \u00e0 la suite de son audition se mesure au courrier \u00e9lectronique qu’il a re\u00e7u, selon ses affirmations: plus de 12.000 messages.) Galloway r\u00e9pond aux questions… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66453","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66453","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66453"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66453\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66453"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}