{"id":66455,"date":"2005-05-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-05-29T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/05\/29\/notre-programme-dassistance-aux-consultants-en-programme-dassistance-marche-le-tonnerre\/"},"modified":"2005-05-29T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-05-29T00:00:00","slug":"notre-programme-dassistance-aux-consultants-en-programme-dassistance-marche-le-tonnerre","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/05\/29\/notre-programme-dassistance-aux-consultants-en-programme-dassistance-marche-le-tonnerre\/","title":{"rendered":"Notre programme d&rsquo;assistance aux consultants en programme d&rsquo;assistance marche le tonnerre"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La proportion est belle comme un r\u00e9sultat de r\u00e9f\u00e9rendum : 40% (soit $20 milliards) de l&rsquo;aide des pays d\u00e9velopp\u00e9s aux pays pauvres (soit $50 milliards) va aux consultants (d\u00e9velopp\u00e9s) charg\u00e9s de conseiller les pays pauvres \u00e0 d\u00e9penser l&rsquo;argent de leur programme d&rsquo;assistance, amput\u00e9 du programme d&rsquo;assistance aux consultants charg\u00e9s de <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa nouvelle est math\u00e9matique et nous est <a href=\"http:\/\/observer.guardian.co.uk\/business\/story\/0,6903,1494543,00.html\" class=\"gen\">pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e dans sa puret\u00e9 postmoderne<\/a> par l&rsquo;<em>Observer<\/em> de ce dimanche.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Consultants are creaming off a staggering $20 billion from hard-won global aid budgets. The $20bn total is 40 per cent of the international communities&rsquo; overseas development pot of $50bn  money that is meant to relieve poverty in developing countries. The World Bank has confirmed the figure for the first time: this weekend it admitted that money spent on technical assistance and consultants had increased by $2bn on last year&rsquo;s $18bn total. A spokesman conceded that ballooning consultants&rsquo;fees need to be addressed.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The news comes in the wake of a hard-hitting report by charity ActionAid, which said that a huge proportion of aid was wasted, misdirected or recycled in rich countries.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The focus on the effectiveness of aid coincides with the drive by Tony Blair and Gordon Brown to persuade G8 countries to double aid to poor nations to $100bn at a crucial meeting of world leaders in Gleneagles in five weeks.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa seule perspective rassurante est que Paul Wolfowitz arrive \u00e0 la t\u00eate de la World Bank. Il est charg\u00e9 de la riche exp\u00e9rience de la construction de la paix et de la d\u00e9mocratie en Europe (pardon, en Irak, confusion avec Marshall), et surtout du programme de reconstruction qui a fait baisser la production de p\u00e9trole de un million de barils\/jour.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00c9coutez, \u00e7a doit pouvoir marcher. Avec l&rsquo;augmentation propos\u00e9e par les duettistes Brown &#038; Blair, on devrait pouvoir \u00e9quilibrer,  loyalement et d\u00e9mocratiquement, putain!  \u00e0 <em>fifty<\/em>&#8211;<em>fifty<\/em>, soit $50 milliards aux pauvres et $50 milliards aux pauvres consultants. Ainsi, la totalit\u00e9 du montant de l&rsquo;aide actuelle ira aux pays pauvres. Qui a encore quelque chose \u00e0 (re)dire?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne (\u00e0 grands frais) le 29 mai 2005 \u00e0 13H30<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La proportion est belle comme un r\u00e9sultat de r\u00e9f\u00e9rendum : 40% (soit $20 milliards) de l&rsquo;aide des pays d\u00e9velopp\u00e9s aux pays pauvres (soit $50 milliards) va aux consultants (d\u00e9velopp\u00e9s) charg\u00e9s de conseiller les pays pauvres \u00e0 d\u00e9penser l&rsquo;argent de leur programme d&rsquo;assistance, amput\u00e9 du programme d&rsquo;assistance aux consultants charg\u00e9s de La nouvelle est math\u00e9matique et&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4585,1448,3986],"class_list":["post-66455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bank","tag-wolfowitz","tag-world"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66455"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66455\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}