{"id":66462,"date":"2005-05-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-05-31T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/05\/31\/messieurs-les-francais-lisez-cet-anglais-jonathan-steele\/"},"modified":"2005-05-31T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-05-31T00:00:00","slug":"messieurs-les-francais-lisez-cet-anglais-jonathan-steele","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/05\/31\/messieurs-les-francais-lisez-cet-anglais-jonathan-steele\/","title":{"rendered":"Messieurs les Fran\u00e7ais, lisez cet Anglais (Jonathan Steele)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Avec les Anglais, tout est possible,  y compris qu&rsquo;ils comprennent mieux que la plupart des Fran\u00e7ais un \u00e9v\u00e9nement fran\u00e7ais aussi fondamental que le r\u00e9f\u00e9rendum du 29 mai. Cet Anglais, c&rsquo;est <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/eu\/story\/0,7369,1495893,00.html\" class=\"gen\">Jonathan Steele, \u00e0 bord du Guardian<\/a>, le 31 mai, avec son article \u00ab <em>The no vote was a shout of defiance  Elite group thinking has been defeated in France&rsquo;s Europe poll<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tVoici la conclusion de notre Britannique pr\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9, avec, \u00e0 la fin, son horrible et sacril\u00e8ge proposition d\u00e9mocratique: \u00ab <em> The real debates about reform should take place elsewhere. The French government was brave enough to launch what became a mature and reasoned nationwide seminar that, in spite of heavy media efforts to dragoon voters, produced real freedom of thought as well as freedom from the pressures of party loyalty.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>This was where people&rsquo;s power came in. It was a victory over elite group-think  pens\u00e9e libre versus pens\u00e9e unique. Other governments, Britain&rsquo;s included, should give citizens the same opportunity.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tSteele, d\u00e9j\u00e0 remarquable dans un article de commentaire avant le r\u00e9f\u00e9rendum (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/eu\/story\/0,7369,1488439,00.html\" class=\"gen\">le 20 mai<\/a>), montre qu&rsquo;il a une ampleur et une libert\u00e9 d&rsquo;analyse assez peu commune, m\u00eame au Royaume-Uni o\u00f9 la presse reste pourtant remarquable, sans parler bien s\u00fbr de la France qui \u00e9tale par louches enti\u00e8res l&rsquo;extraordinaire conformisme de ses intellectuels commentateurs. (Steele sur ce que repr\u00e9sente le non pour l&rsquo;<em>establishment<\/em> fran\u00e7ais: \u00ab <em>It was a shout of defiance at intellectual Stalinism, masquerading as liberalism, which recognises only one side of an argument as respectable and pays serious attention to no one but those it already agrees with.<\/em> \u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPour Steele, la France, au contraire d&rsquo;\u00eatre retardataire, craintive, franchouillarde, etc., est simplement le pays europ\u00e9en d&rsquo;avant-garde. Elle a soulev\u00e9 le voile et montr\u00e9, simplement, que le roi est nu: \u00ab <em>Sunday&rsquo;s vote has highlighted the crisis of social democracy across Europe.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 31 mai 2005 \u00e0 11H55<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Avec les Anglais, tout est possible, y compris qu&rsquo;ils comprennent mieux que la plupart des Fran\u00e7ais un \u00e9v\u00e9nement fran\u00e7ais aussi fondamental que le r\u00e9f\u00e9rendum du 29 mai. Cet Anglais, c&rsquo;est Jonathan Steele, \u00e0 bord du Guardian, le 31 mai, avec son article \u00ab The no vote was a shout of defiance Elite group thinking has&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66462","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66462","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66462"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66462\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66462"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66462"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66462"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}