ce choix compl\u00e8tement appropri\u00e9<\/a> et s’en est longuement expliqu\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00ab An official of Amnesty International said Friday <\/em>[3 June] that the term gulag in its annual report to describe the United States prison camp at Guant\u00e1namo Bay, Cuba, was chosen deliberately, and she shrugged off harsh criticism of the report by the Bush administration.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb The official, Kate Gilmore, the group’s executive deputy secretary general, said the administration’s response was typical of a government on the defensive, and she drew parallels to the reactions of the former Soviet Union, Libya and Iran under Ayatollah Khomeini, when those governments were accused of human rights abuses.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t(…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00bb In a telephone interview on Friday, Ms. Gilmore, the second-ranking official in Amnesty, said gulag was not meant as a literal description of Guant\u00e1namo but was emblematic of the sense of injustice and lack of due process surrounding the prison.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb The issue of the gulag is about policies and practices, she said. You put people beyond the reach of law, you locate them in facilities where families can’t access them, you deny them access to legal representation, you attempt to prevent judicial review.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb She added, This creates the likelihood that the people who are there have nothing to do with criminal conduct or that it is a breach of the Geneva Convention.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 6 juin 2005 \u00e0 10H00<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Il y a eu un \u00e9change acide entre Amnesty International et les dirigeants am\u00e9ricains depuis la publication du rapport d’Amnesty o\u00f9 le syst\u00e8me am\u00e9ricain de d\u00e9tention et de torture dans divers pays, de Guantanamo \u00e0 l’Irak et \u00e0 l’Afghanistan, \u00e9tait d\u00e9sign\u00e9 comme The gulag of our times. Bush et Rumsfeld avaient qualifi\u00e9 en des termes… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1222],"class_list":["post-66481","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-amnesty"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66481","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66481"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66481\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66481"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66481"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}