{"id":66488,"date":"2005-06-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-06-07T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/06\/07\/lue-et-le-sentiment-national\/"},"modified":"2005-06-07T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-06-07T00:00:00","slug":"lue-et-le-sentiment-national","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/06\/07\/lue-et-le-sentiment-national\/","title":{"rendered":"L&rsquo;UE et le sentiment national"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Revenons sur <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/2005\/06\/07\/news\/eu.php\" class=\"gen\">cet int\u00e9ressant article<\/a> \u00e9crit notamment autour de l&rsquo;intervention, la semaine derni\u00e8re, du ministre des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res allemands et d\u00e9j\u00e0 signal\u00e9 \u00e0 ce propos <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=1627\" class=\"gen\">dans cette rubrique<\/a>. L&rsquo;article est de Richard Bernstein, un de ces journalistes am\u00e9ricains qu&rsquo;on juge connaisseurs de l&rsquo;Europe,  et particuli\u00e8rement de la France, tant le non-dit am\u00e9ricain vous dit que conna\u00eetre l&rsquo;Europe sans la France c&rsquo;est n&rsquo;en rien conna\u00eetre, et conna\u00eetre la France c&rsquo;est d\u00e9j\u00e0 presque conna\u00eetre l&rsquo;Europe. Bernstein a \u00e9t\u00e9 correspondant du New York <em>Times<\/em> \u00e0 Paris de 1984 \u00e0 1987 et a ramen\u00e9 de cette exp\u00e9rience un livre (<em>Fragile Glory<\/em>), qui m\u00e9lange de fa\u00e7on acceptable (c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire \u00e9quitable) les st\u00e9r\u00e9otypes et lieux communs, une portion notable de la fascination am\u00e9ricaine pour la France et des observations sens\u00e9es et bienvenues. Le titre offre finalement une belle interpr\u00e9tation de l&rsquo;objet qu&rsquo;il pr\u00e9tend embrasser.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;article de Bernstein est int\u00e9ressant d&rsquo;un point de vue europ\u00e9en, dans ce qu&rsquo;il sugg\u00e8re plus qu&rsquo;il ne dit, par des appr\u00e9ciations qu&rsquo;on dirait de perception plut\u00f4t qu&rsquo;objectives. C&rsquo;est un dithyrambe dissimul\u00e9 de l&rsquo;Europe,  l&rsquo;Europe qui r\u00e9sistera \u00e0 tout, qui sera sauv\u00e9e et m\u00eame continu\u00e9e et ainsi de suite. Il y a de la langue de bois l\u00e0-dedans, et puis, aussi, de la v\u00e9rit\u00e9. Ce dernier point, d&rsquo;autant plus acceptable \u00e0 la mesure de la nuance qui se d\u00e9gage finalement, et qui attache notre int\u00e9r\u00eat parce que nous la jugeons essentielle.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe passage ci-dessous nous en dit plus :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Measured by the mood in France and the Netherlands these days, the sense is that the EU&rsquo;s momentum has ground to a halt, and, clearly, it has, though the heads of state of the 25 member countries will meet in an emergency session in Brussels next week to try to decide how to get the machine in motion again.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>But measured against European history, European integration is a remarkable accomplishment, helping to transform one of the most war-torn, politically afflicted and economically divided large regions of the world into an immense international club where war has become unthinkable. It has done so, not by eliminating nationalism, but by changing it.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>People aren&rsquo;t less patriotic, Leonard said. National identities haven&rsquo;t waned at all. If anything, they&rsquo;ve become stronger. Germany, for example, has become much more self-confident. Britain as well. People are more patriotic than they were 20 years ago.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>But the EU has changed the nature of nationalism within Europe, he said, so it&rsquo;s no longer about fighting wars with each other, but managing diversity peacefully.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tImpossible aujourd&rsquo;hui de lancer des hypoth\u00e8ses pr\u00e9cises sur l&rsquo;avenir de l&rsquo;imbroglio europ\u00e9en, dans quel sens il va \u00eatre d\u00e9nou\u00e9, par quels moyens, etc. Une seule chose nous appara\u00eet avec certitude, que cet article illustre, sans doute involontairement : la question de l&rsquo;identit\u00e9 nationale, son maintien, sa protection, son affirmation, a fait une intrusion explosive sur la sc\u00e8ne europ\u00e9enne. (Le reste, question de s\u00e9mantique, appeler cela patriotisme apais\u00e9, bannir \u00e9videmment,  horreur,  le mot nationalisme sans qualificatif pacificateur, etc., voil\u00e0 qui est d&rsquo;une importance accessoire.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tQue tout cela soit venu de la France n&rsquo;a rien qui doive nous \u00e9tonner. Cette question de l&rsquo;identit\u00e9 nationale ne nous quittera plus. Il faudra que l&rsquo;UE la r\u00e9solve pour survivre, en lui donnant la place qui convient, la premi\u00e8re. C&rsquo;est d\u00e9sormais une condition <em>sine qua non<\/em> de l&rsquo;Europe, et un germe de r\u00e9volution par rapport aux courants id\u00e9ologiques dominants.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 7 juin 2005 \u00e0 19H45<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Revenons sur cet int\u00e9ressant article \u00e9crit notamment autour de l&rsquo;intervention, la semaine derni\u00e8re, du ministre des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res allemands et d\u00e9j\u00e0 signal\u00e9 \u00e0 ce propos dans cette rubrique. L&rsquo;article est de Richard Bernstein, un de ces journalistes am\u00e9ricains qu&rsquo;on juge connaisseurs de l&rsquo;Europe, et particuli\u00e8rement de la France, tant le non-dit am\u00e9ricain vous dit que&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66488","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66488","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66488"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66488\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66488"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66488"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66488"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}