{"id":66499,"date":"2005-06-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-06-11T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/06\/11\/la-preuve-par-la-chine\/"},"modified":"2005-06-11T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-06-11T00:00:00","slug":"la-preuve-par-la-chine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/06\/11\/la-preuve-par-la-chine\/","title":{"rendered":"La preuve par la Chine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Peu apr\u00e8s les non fran\u00e7ais et hollandais, au tout d\u00e9but juin, les n\u00e9gociations entre l&rsquo;UE et la Chine sur un \u00e9ventuel contingentement des textiles atteignaient un point crucial. On parlait de rupture et l&rsquo;on laissant entendre que la Chine \u00e9tait sur le point de d\u00e9cider  comme elle en aurait le droit, voire le devoir en th\u00e9orie, si l&rsquo;on se conforme \u00e0 la th\u00e9orie du libre-\u00e9change  de laisser aller ses exportations selon les seules lois du march\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPlusieurs voix des tenants du oui s&rsquo;\u00e9lev\u00e8rent pour tirer une conclusion, avant m\u00eame la conclusion de la chose: profitant de la faiblesse de l&rsquo;Europe frapp\u00e9e de plein fouet par les non&rsquo;, la Chine affiche son intransigeance. Ce fut notamment l&rsquo;argument de parlementaires fran\u00e7ais de droite au Parlement europ\u00e9en.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes derni\u00e8res nouvelles obligent \u00e0 r\u00e9viser l&rsquo;analyse, vite fait. L&rsquo;Europe continue \u00e0 \u00eatre un partenaire avec lequel la Chine prend des gants, ce qui conduit \u00e0 se demander si les non l&rsquo;ont effectivement affaiblie, voire d\u00e9truite comme le dit la rh\u00e9torique en question. Apr\u00e8s tout, ce pourrait ^tre le contraire, non? Voici ce que nous dit <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/2005\/06\/11\/business\/textile.php\" class=\"gen\">l&rsquo;International Herald Tribune<\/a> de ce matin: \u00ab <em>Hoping to ease growing trade tensions with the European Union, China agreed early Saturday to place voluntary limits on the growth of its textile and apparel exports to Europe.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The decision came just hours before the European Union was set to impose its own trade restrictions on China as a way to stem the flood of Chinese textile and apparel goods that have flowed into Europe this year. According to the agreement, China is expected to work with EU officials to manage and limit the growth of certain textile and apparel exports to Europe to about 10 percent a year through the end of 2008, in effect tempering the rise of some of its largest and fastest-growing exports.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 11 juin 2005 \u00e0 14H50<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Peu apr\u00e8s les non fran\u00e7ais et hollandais, au tout d\u00e9but juin, les n\u00e9gociations entre l&rsquo;UE et la Chine sur un \u00e9ventuel contingentement des textiles atteignaient un point crucial. On parlait de rupture et l&rsquo;on laissant entendre que la Chine \u00e9tait sur le point de d\u00e9cider comme elle en aurait le droit, voire le devoir en&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[398,1225],"class_list":["post-66499","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-europe","tag-referendum"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66499","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66499"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66499\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66499"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66499"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66499"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}