{"id":66520,"date":"2005-06-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-06-19T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/06\/19\/aspect-nouveau-du-desordre-en-irak\/"},"modified":"2005-06-19T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-06-19T00:00:00","slug":"aspect-nouveau-du-desordre-en-irak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/06\/19\/aspect-nouveau-du-desordre-en-irak\/","title":{"rendered":"Aspect nouveau du d\u00e9sordre en Irak"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Un article du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsws.org\/articles\/2005\/jun2005\/merc-j17.shtml\" class=\"gen\">site WSWS.org<\/a> nous apporte des informations et une analyse sur une nouvelle dimension du d\u00e9sordre que l&rsquo;intervention am\u00e9ricaine a install\u00e9 en Irak. Il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;un incident tr\u00e8s grave opposant des soldats US (des Marines) et des contractants priv\u00e9s, des mercenaires d&rsquo;une firme priv\u00e9e US, aboutissant \u00e0 l&rsquo;arrestation de 16 mercenaires, leur d\u00e9tention, leur lib\u00e9ration assortie de plaintes pour s\u00e9vices, tortures, etc.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>A controversy surrounding the detention of a team of private contractors by US marines on May 28 has exposed the sharp tensions being produced by the activities of thousands of mercenaries employed by the Bush administration to help enforce the occupation of Iraq.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Exactly what took place is the subject of conflicting claims. What is agreed is that 16 American contractors working for the North Carolina-based Zapata Engineering, along with three Iraqi maintenance workers, were arrested by marines and held in a US-run prison for three days.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDes d\u00e9tails divers sont donn\u00e9s dans le texte, qui font mesurer les fortes tensions entre les troupes r\u00e9guli\u00e8res et les contractants priv\u00e9s. Cela laisse \u00e0 penser pour l&rsquo;\u00e9ventuelle coordination des efforts anti-r\u00e9sistance, qui semble d&rsquo;ailleurs r\u00e9duite \u00e0 rien pour l&rsquo;instant. Chacun suit son programme, dans une compl\u00e8te impunit\u00e9, sauf lorsqu&rsquo;il y a des heurts entre des forces de ces deux groupes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes contractants priv\u00e9s, indique le texte, auraient d\u00e9j\u00e0 eu 300 morts et 2.700 bless\u00e9s. Il y aurait 25.000 mercenaires de cette sorte en Irak et qu&rsquo;il pourrait y en avoir encore plus du fait que les Am\u00e9ricains n&rsquo;ont plus la capacit\u00e9 d&rsquo;envoyer des renforts. La situation devrait empirer du point de vue du d\u00e9sordre d\u00e9crit ici, d&rsquo;autant plus que le niveau des mercenaires,  niveau professionnel et niveau d&rsquo;un semblant d&rsquo;\u00e9thique,  devrait baisser. Il semble en effet que les soldats d&rsquo;une certaine qualit\u00e9 sont de moins en moins tent\u00e9s par cette sorte d&rsquo;engagement, malgr\u00e9 les sommes en jeu. Il y a des indications en France selon lesquelles le recrutement, qui avait touch\u00e9 des soldats en rupture de certaines unit\u00e9s d&rsquo;\u00e9lite fran\u00e7aises (notamment les parachutistes l\u00e9gionnaires), serait en train de tarir \u00e0 cause de la situation en Irak, per\u00e7ue de plus en plus comme un pi\u00e8ge \u00e9pouvantable  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEt au milieu de tout cela, il y a les Irakiens<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 19 juin 2005 \u00e0 12H35<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Un article du site WSWS.org nous apporte des informations et une analyse sur une nouvelle dimension du d\u00e9sordre que l&rsquo;intervention am\u00e9ricaine a install\u00e9 en Irak. Il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;un incident tr\u00e8s grave opposant des soldats US (des Marines) et des contractants priv\u00e9s, des mercenaires d&rsquo;une firme priv\u00e9e US, aboutissant \u00e0 l&rsquo;arrestation de 16 mercenaires, leur d\u00e9tention,&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66520","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66520","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66520"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66520\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66520"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66520"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66520"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}