{"id":66525,"date":"2005-06-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-06-20T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/06\/20\/le-scenario-de-buchanan\/"},"modified":"2005-06-20T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-06-20T00:00:00","slug":"le-scenario-de-buchanan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/06\/20\/le-scenario-de-buchanan\/","title":{"rendered":"Le sc\u00e9nario de Buchanan"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Traduisant un courant de plus en plus fort \u00e0 Washington, le commentateur Patrick J. Buchanan envisage <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/pat\/?articleid=6368\" class=\"gen\">l&rsquo;apparition de candidats anti-guerre<\/a> en 2008. Il cite le pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent fameux de 1968, o\u00f9 le candidat \u00e0 la d\u00e9signation d\u00e9mocrate Eugene McCarthy faillit l&#8217;emporter contre le candidat finalement d\u00e9sign\u00e9 par le parti d\u00e9mocrate, Hubert Humphrey.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tMais quel nouveau McCarthy? Buchanan envisage le c\u00f4t\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate: pour lui, si Hillary Clinton ne prend une position plus anti-guerre, elle aura des difficult\u00e9s pour gagner la d\u00e9signation par le parti d\u00e9mocrate. M\u00eame chose pour tout autre candidat pro-guerre des d\u00e9mocrates, ce qui implique par avance que le d\u00e9mocrate sera battu avec un parti aussi divis\u00e9 qu&rsquo;il l&rsquo;\u00e9tait en 1968. Par qui? Buchanan avance l&rsquo;hypoth\u00e8se d&rsquo;un r\u00e9publicain anti-guerre, pour finalement la r\u00e9futer.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEt alors ? \u00ab <em>No matter how badly things have gone in Iraq by 2008, how can the GOP nominate a candidate who has run against the cause that defined the presidency of George W. Bush?<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>As the Bush poll numbers fall and the Iraq war returns front-and-center to politics, the divisions in this country over whether to stay the course; escalate, as the prospect of failure is intolerable to the nation; or begin to withdraw and take the consequences will reappear and deepen.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>A politics of war, a politics of upheaval, lie just ahead.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tConclusion ambigu\u00eb qui semble nous donner le choix entre la peste et le cholera. Ce que nous indique ce texte, c&rsquo;est que la catastrophique guerre en Irak p\u00e8se d\u00e9sormais comme un boulet sur Washington et annonce d\u00e9j\u00e0 l&rsquo;ouverture de la campagne pr\u00e9sidentielle de 2008. Avec des bouleversements possibles\/probables comme perspective, plut\u00f4t que la pieuse continuation de la brutale politique bushiste. Buchanan est un isolationniste ; nul doute qu&rsquo;il esp\u00e8re que sa tendance s&rsquo;imposera,  ce qui est tr\u00e8s loin d&rsquo;\u00eatre impossible.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 20 juin 2005 \u00e0 14H55<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Traduisant un courant de plus en plus fort \u00e0 Washington, le commentateur Patrick J. Buchanan envisage l&rsquo;apparition de candidats anti-guerre en 2008. Il cite le pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent fameux de 1968, o\u00f9 le candidat \u00e0 la d\u00e9signation d\u00e9mocrate Eugene McCarthy faillit l&#8217;emporter contre le candidat finalement d\u00e9sign\u00e9 par le parti d\u00e9mocrate, Hubert Humphrey. Mais quel nouveau McCarthy?&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1242],"class_list":["post-66525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-isolationnisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66525\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}