{"id":66550,"date":"2005-06-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-06-29T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/06\/29\/trafalgar-morne-plaine\/"},"modified":"2005-06-29T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-06-29T00:00:00","slug":"trafalgar-morne-plaine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/06\/29\/trafalgar-morne-plaine\/","title":{"rendered":"Trafalgar, morne plaine"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Les Britanniques ont \u00e9t\u00e9 les premiers \u00e0 le reconna\u00eetre. Voici ce qu&rsquo;en disait <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/1\/hi\/uk\/4627469.stm\" class=\"gen\">BBC.News lundi<\/a>: \u00ab <em>Britannia may think it ruled the waves, but on Tuesday it is a French warship that will dominate the English Channel.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>She is the pride of the French navy  the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>She is 261m (285 yards) long, 64m (70 yards) wide and weighs 42,000 tons  dwarfing all the other vessels taking part in the International Fleet Review.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDurant la parade navale qui c\u00e9l\u00e9brait le bicentenaire de la fameuse victoire britannique, un commentateur de radio s&rsquo;est \u00e9cri\u00e9, \u00e0 propos des sous-marins nucl\u00e9aires fran\u00e7aise: \u00ab <em>Et les Fran\u00e7ais ma\u00eetrisent toutes les technologies qui se trouvent dans ces unit\u00e9s, et tous les armements !<\/em> \u00bb Cette description contraste dramatiquement avec la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 des unit\u00e9s britanniques \u00e9quivalentes, o\u00f9 ni l&rsquo;acc\u00e8s aux propulseurs nucl\u00e9aires ni le contr\u00f4le des armes nucl\u00e9aires ne sont autoris\u00e9s \u00e0 d&rsquo;autres personnes que des militaires et des fonctionnaires de nationalit\u00e9 am\u00e9ricaine.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAvec la pr\u00e9sence du <em>Charles-de-Gaulle<\/em> et des autres unit\u00e9s fran\u00e7aises aux c\u00f4t\u00e9s des unit\u00e9s de la Royal Navy, le bicentenaire n&rsquo;a fait que souligner combien, en deux cents ans, l&rsquo;Angleterre a perdu de cette situation qui fit sa fiert\u00e9 et sa puissance: l&rsquo;autonomie et la capacit\u00e9 de son arme la plus superbe, la Royal Navy. Par contraste, la France, avec bien plus de vicissitudes et de revers dans son Histoire, a su conserver son rang dans la mati\u00e8re qui compte le plus : la souverainet\u00e9 de sa puissance. Voil\u00e0 ce que, 200 ans plus tard, Trafalgar nous a montr\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 29 juin 2005 \u00e0 19H38<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Les Britanniques ont \u00e9t\u00e9 les premiers \u00e0 le reconna\u00eetre. Voici ce qu&rsquo;en disait BBC.News lundi: \u00ab Britannia may think it ruled the waves, but on Tuesday it is a French warship that will dominate the English Channel. \u00bb She is the pride of the French navy the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier, the Charles de Gaulle. \u00bb&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66550","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66550","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66550"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66550\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66550"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66550"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66550"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}