{"id":66554,"date":"2005-07-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-07-02T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/07\/02\/les-surprises-chinoises\/"},"modified":"2005-07-02T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-07-02T00:00:00","slug":"les-surprises-chinoises","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/07\/02\/les-surprises-chinoises\/","title":{"rendered":"Les surprises chinoises"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>L&rsquo;affaire de l&rsquo;offre de rachat de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 californienne Unocal (exploitation gazi\u00e8re) par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 p\u00e9troli\u00e8re publique chinoise CNOOC soul\u00e8ve un probl\u00e8me \u00e9norme et simple. CNOOC offre $18,5 milliards alors que Chevron offre $16,5 milliards. Le Congr\u00e8s s&rsquo;\u00e9trangle et parle des int\u00e9r\u00eats strat\u00e9giques des USA, de l&rsquo;ennemi chinois et ainsi de suite.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEt alors? On avait d\u00e9j\u00e0 parl\u00e9 de la sorte lorsque les Chinois ont commenc\u00e9 \u00e0 envahir les march\u00e9s am\u00e9ricains et europ\u00e9ens avec leurs produits textiles \u00e0 des prix d\u00e9fiant toute concurrence. Probl\u00e8me \u00e9norme,  mais probl\u00e8me simple : les Chinois appliquent les r\u00e8gles du jeu du capitalisme et de la globalisation. Comme ils ont beaucoup d&rsquo;argent et qu&rsquo;ils sont avis\u00e9s<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tQue faire? D\u00e9j\u00e0, en Europe, l&rsquo;excellent avocat du lib\u00e9ralisme et du libre-\u00e9change, ami intime de Tony Blair, le Commissaire Peter Mandelson, se bat \u00e0 coup de menaces tarifaires, de prescriptions n\u00e9o-protectionnistes, etc., contre les Chinois (et les Am\u00e9ricains). Les Am\u00e9ricains vont-ils faire intervenir la puissance publique pour interdire le rachat de Unocal?  Vont-ils r\u00e9tablir le protectionnisme (si tant est qu&rsquo;ils l&rsquo;aient jamais abandonn\u00e9)?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tProbl\u00e8me \u00e9norme et simple : la globalisation et le capitalisme, c&rsquo;est formidable quand \u00e7a marche \u00e0 votre avantage exclusif. Dans le cas contraire, mouvements divers chez les commentateurs<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLisez le texte de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/hacohen\/?articleid=6497\" class=\"gen\">l&rsquo;excellent Leon Hadar<\/a> qui parle de la menace chinoise d&rsquo;un 9\/11 \u00e9conomique contre les USA, du moins dans de nombreux esprits fi\u00e9vreux \u00e0 Washington. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Since Chinese accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO), the debate here has focused on whether China was ready to play by the rules of Western-style capitalism.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Now that China seems to be playing by those rules as one of its companies asks that Unocal&rsquo;s shareholders approve the proposed deal, the question is: Will the political elites in Washington respond to China&rsquo;s economic rise by trying to use the power of the state to prevent Chinese capital from flowing into the American market, and hence pose a clear challenge to the same rules of free-market economy that the US is supposedly promoting worldwide?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>&quot;Resorting to isolationist trade policies would be ineffective, disruptive to markets and damaging to America&rsquo;s special role as the world&rsquo;s leading advocate for open markets,&quot; US Treasury Secretary John Snow reminded US lawmakers, responding to their pressure to &quot;do something&quot; to prevent CNOOC from acquiring UNOCAL and to force China to lift its capital controls. Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan also sounded a cautionary note during an exchange with lawmakers, arguing against moves to punish China over its exchange rate system.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The debate on China reflects the angry nationalist mood in the US capital where growing frustration over the failure to end the anti-American insurgency in Iraq seems to be spilling over into other foreign policy issues.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>At the same time, discontent over the problems facing the US economy  including the decline of manufacturing industries, the outsourcing of service jobs and the expanding US trade deficit (including with China)  has led lawmakers to search for foreign scapegoats.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 2 juillet 2005 \u00e0 10H06<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>L&rsquo;affaire de l&rsquo;offre de rachat de la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 californienne Unocal (exploitation gazi\u00e8re) par la soci\u00e9t\u00e9 p\u00e9troli\u00e8re publique chinoise CNOOC soul\u00e8ve un probl\u00e8me \u00e9norme et simple. CNOOC offre $18,5 milliards alors que Chevron offre $16,5 milliards. Le Congr\u00e8s s&rsquo;\u00e9trangle et parle des int\u00e9r\u00eats strat\u00e9giques des USA, de l&rsquo;ennemi chinois et ainsi de suite. Et alors? On&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4626,1097,4625],"class_list":["post-66554","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cnooc","tag-protectionnisme","tag-unocal"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66554","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66554"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66554\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66554"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66554"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66554"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}