{"id":66555,"date":"2005-07-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-07-02T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/07\/02\/7-1-contre-les-usa-est-ce-possible\/"},"modified":"2005-07-02T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-07-02T00:00:00","slug":"7-1-contre-les-usa-est-ce-possible","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/07\/02\/7-1-contre-les-usa-est-ce-possible\/","title":{"rendered":"7-1 contre les USA, est-ce possible?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le grand terrain d&rsquo;affrontement du G-8, c&rsquo;est la question de la crise climatique. Tony Blair en a fait un de ses chevaux de bataille, malgr\u00e9 la r\u00e9ticence \u00e9vidente de son ami GW pour cette sorte de pr\u00e9occupations. Pour les Am\u00e9ricains, la terre va assez bien, merci, puisqu&rsquo;ils peuvent br\u00fbler leur p\u00e9trole et que les <em>Majors<\/em> (soci\u00e9t\u00e9s p\u00e9troli\u00e8res) font des b\u00e9n\u00e9fices. Bien s\u00fbr, elles chauffent un peu <em>so what<\/em>?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAlors que le <em>Guardian<\/em> semble dire, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/g8\/story\/0,13365,1519435,00.html\" class=\"gen\">mais de fa\u00e7on ambigu\u00eb<\/a>, que les Am\u00e9ricains sont pr\u00eats \u00e0 certaines concessions, <em>The Independent<\/em> (tr\u00e8s en pointe sur les questions de la crise climatique) \u00e9voque, lui, la possibilit\u00e9 <a href=\"http:\/\/news.independent.co.uk\/world\/environment\/article296256.ece\" class=\"gen\">d&rsquo;un communiqu\u00e9 7 contre 1<\/a>, le 1 \u00e9tant les USA. En effet, sur cette question de la crise climatique, c&rsquo;est l&rsquo;union sacr\u00e9e du reste du monde, y compris des Europ\u00e9ens. Chirac et Schr\u00f6der soutiennent Blair,  plus encore (pire pour l&rsquo;Anglais), ils poussent Blair \u00e0 adopter la position dure contre les USA \u00e0 laquelle sa propre logique conduit. Les Britanniques r\u00e9sistent en tentant au maximum d&rsquo;\u00e9viter l&rsquo;isolement de l&rsquo;Am\u00e9rique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tInt\u00e9ressant de suivre le d\u00e9roulement de cette bataille qui a des connotations politiques et des aspects compl\u00e8tement fondamentaux de perception du monde et de conception de civilisation. Nul ne peut \u00e9carter l&rsquo;id\u00e9e qu&rsquo;en soulevant le probl\u00e8me de la crise climatique, c&rsquo;est la question m\u00eame du mod\u00e8le \u00e9conomique occidental (lib\u00e9ral, am\u00e9ricaniste) qui est en cause.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tQuelques extraits du texte de <em>The Independent<\/em>:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Jacques Chirac, the French President, and Gerhard Schr\u00f6der, the German Chancellor, have joined forces to press Tony Blair to isolate the Americans over climate change at next week&rsquo;s G8 summit.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The French and Germans would prefer a 7-1 split over the final communiqu\u00e9 on the issue, which is being negotiated this weekend by officials in London, rather than bow to pressure by the US for it to be watered down.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>A leaked draft of the communiqu\u00e9 yesterday showed that the Americans are still resisting a tough wording on the scientific evidence that human activity is causing climate change. British negotiators are seeking a compromise to keep the US on board, but France and Germany are insisting on an explicit reference to the scientific evidence, with wording on the urgency of the threat from global warming.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t(&#8230;)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Downing Street signalled last night that Britain would resist being forced to join France and Germany in a 7-1 standoff against Mr Bush at the summit. A senior cabinet minister said Britain would adopt the role of honest brokers as hosts of the G8 conference. The Prime Minister&rsquo;s official spokesman said: &quot;We are approaching this as the president of the G8. Serious negotiations are going on.&quot;<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>However, President Chirac is determined to hold Mr Blair to the principles for climate change that the UK has set out in the past. &quot;We are very supportive of the UK on the G8,&quot; said the French source. &quot;We share the view with Blair that the two main topics of development aid and climate change are equally important and are linked.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>&quot;It is in Africa that the effects of climate change will be felt most. The two go hand in hand. It doesn&rsquo;t make sense to increase development aid if that effort is going to be wasted as a result of unchallenged climate change.&quot;<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 2 juillet 2005 \u00e0 11H15<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le grand terrain d&rsquo;affrontement du G-8, c&rsquo;est la question de la crise climatique. Tony Blair en a fait un de ses chevaux de bataille, malgr\u00e9 la r\u00e9ticence \u00e9vidente de son ami GW pour cette sorte de pr\u00e9occupations. Pour les Am\u00e9ricains, la terre va assez bien, merci, puisqu&rsquo;ils peuvent br\u00fbler leur p\u00e9trole et que les Majors&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3392,3228,4307],"class_list":["post-66555","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-climatique","tag-crise","tag-g8"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66555"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66555\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}