Bush vs the world<\/em> \u00bb), \u00e9galement sous d’autres aspects.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tL’un de ces aspects nous arr\u00eate ici, parce qu’il donne une \u00e9valuation chiffr\u00e9e d’un des aspects tr\u00e8s pr\u00e9cis de la situation actuelle : les d\u00e9penses budg\u00e9taires compar\u00e9es de deux des principaux \u00e9v\u00e9nements de la guerre contre la terreur, l’attaque du 11 septembre 2001 et les mesures de d\u00e9fense prises par les USA contre une nouvelle attaque de cette sorte. A notre connaissance, cette sorte d’estimation de cet aspect particulier des \u00e9v\u00e9nements depuis le 11 septembre est tr\u00e8s rarement donn\u00e9e. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00ab Al-Qaida spent an estimated $500,000 on the attacks against Manhattan’s Twin Towers and the Pentagon. Since then, the U.S. has spent about $200 billion on myriad defensive measures against the next attack, widely believed to be a mass casualty WMD nightmare, and the meter is still running. Clearly such a ratio is unsustainable.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLes co\u00fbts mentionn\u00e9s par Borchgrave du c\u00f4t\u00e9 am\u00e9ricain concernent les seules d\u00e9penses du nouveau minist\u00e8re de d\u00e9fense int\u00e9rieure, le Homeland Security Department. Pour \u00eatre complet, on pourrait chercher \u00e0 y ajouter les co\u00fbts des diverses op\u00e9rations, investissements, etc., lanc\u00e9s au niveau offensif, notamment par le Pentagone, depuis septembre 2001 (par exemple les $217 milliards de la guerre en Irak).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 2 juillet 2005 \u00e0 17H00<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Dans une tr\u00e8s r\u00e9cente chronique (du 1er juillet 2005), Arnaud de Borchgrave analyse la situation de la politique bushiste, principalement au niveau politique (\u00ab Bush vs the world \u00bb), \u00e9galement sous d’autres aspects. L’un de ces aspects nous arr\u00eate ici, parce qu’il donne une \u00e9valuation chiffr\u00e9e d’un des aspects tr\u00e8s pr\u00e9cis de la situation actuelle… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1257],"class_list":["post-66556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-borchgrave"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66556"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66556\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}