{"id":66604,"date":"2005-07-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-07-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/07\/18\/un-rude-coup-pour-tony\/"},"modified":"2005-07-18T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-07-18T00:00:00","slug":"un-rude-coup-pour-tony","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/07\/18\/un-rude-coup-pour-tony\/","title":{"rendered":"Un rude coup pour Tony"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La prise de position du fameux RIIA de Chatham House, le plus prestigieux institut britannique de strat\u00e9gie, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/attackonlondon\/story\/0,16132,1530817,00.html\" class=\"gen\">est un rude coup pour Tony Blair<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tChatam House lie les attentats du 7 juillet \u00e0 Londres \u00e0 l&rsquo;engagement britannique en Irak. C&rsquo;est l&rsquo;aspect le plus imm\u00e9diatement spectaculaire du rapport: \u00ab <em>there is no doubt the invasion of Iraq has given a boost to the al-Qaida network in propaganda, recruitment and fundraising, while providing an ideal targeting and training area for terrorists.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPlus important nous appara\u00eet la prise de position clairement hostile \u00e0 la politique pro-am\u00e9ricaine de Tony Blair, l\u00e0 aussi li\u00e9e aux attentats. C&rsquo;est une position nouvelle, radicale venant de la part d&rsquo;un \u00e9tablissement si mesur\u00e9 et si repr\u00e9sentatif de l&rsquo;<em>establishment<\/em>, et promise \u00e0 avoir des cons\u00e9quences importantes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>According to the body, which includes leading academics and former civil servants among its members, the key problem in the UK for preventing terrorism is that the country is riding as a pillion passenger with the United States in the war against terror.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>It says Britain&rsquo;s ability to carry out counter-terrorism measures has also been hampered because the US is always in the driving seat in deciding policy.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tFace \u00e0 ces attaques, la position de Tony Blair est path\u00e9tique. Son argument, r\u00e9p\u00e9t\u00e9 samedi, selon lequel il y a seulement, dans les attentats, l&rsquo;action d&rsquo;une id\u00e9ologie diabolique (\u00ab <em>Tony Blair said the fanatics who struck in London and launched other attacks around the world were driven by an evil ideology rather than opposition to any policy<\/em> \u00bb) rel\u00e8ve de la plus primaire et de la plus grossi\u00e8re dialectique bushiste. Blair nous donne chaque jour l&rsquo;exemple d&rsquo;une intelligence, qu&rsquo;il a sans aucun doute, soumise \u00e0 la d\u00e9gradation humiliante et d\u00e9cadente de la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de s&rsquo;aligner sur l&rsquo;imb\u00e9cillit\u00e9 primaire. Le pauvre gar\u00e7on m\u00e9rite, au point o\u00f9 il en est, plus de compassion que de critique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 18 juillet 2005 \u00e0 07H00<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La prise de position du fameux RIIA de Chatham House, le plus prestigieux institut britannique de strat\u00e9gie, est un rude coup pour Tony Blair. Chatam House lie les attentats du 7 juillet \u00e0 Londres \u00e0 l&rsquo;engagement britannique en Irak. C&rsquo;est l&rsquo;aspect le plus imm\u00e9diatement spectaculaire du rapport: \u00ab there is no doubt the invasion of&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4639,4640,4641],"class_list":["post-66604","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-chatham","tag-house","tag-riia"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66604","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66604"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66604\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66604"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66604"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66604"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}