{"id":66610,"date":"2005-07-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-07-19T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/07\/19\/pas-terribles-les-nerfs-de-tony\/"},"modified":"2005-07-19T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-07-19T00:00:00","slug":"pas-terribles-les-nerfs-de-tony","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/07\/19\/pas-terribles-les-nerfs-de-tony\/","title":{"rendered":"Pas terribles les nerfs de Tony\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le rapport du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=1746\" class=\"gen\">prestigieux RIIA (Chatham House)<\/a> a eu un effet totalement t\u00e9tanisant sur le gouvernement Blair. C&rsquo;est le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/2005\/07\/18\/news\/london.php\" class=\"gen\">New York Times (IHT)<\/a> qui l&rsquo;observe avec insistance, dans une appr\u00e9ciation comment\u00e9e que l&rsquo;\u00e9quipe gouvernementale britannique appr\u00e9ciera une fois de plus comme une aide bienveillante de l&rsquo;alli\u00e9 am\u00e9ricain. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>The Blair government reacted sharply on Monday to a private research report saying Britain was particularly exposed to terrorist attack because of its role in Iraq as an ally of the Bush administration.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Coming 11 days after four bombers struck London, killing 52 people and themselves, the reaction from three high officials, including Prime Minister Tony Blair, showed the depth of government sensitivity to suggestions that its own policies invited the capital&rsquo;s bloodiest attack in decades.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The government&rsquo;s response added to indications that Britain&rsquo;s role in Iraq was again returning as a political specter, likely to be linked with accusations of a failure by Britain&rsquo;s intelligence agencies, also mentioned in the report on Monday by Chatham House, an influential private research body.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes r\u00e9actions des trois officiels, y compris le PM, n&rsquo;ont \u00e9videmment aucun int\u00e9r\u00eat. Ce qui importe ici, c&rsquo;est la question des nerfs. Imaginez Churchill, apr\u00e8s la Bataille d&rsquo;Angleterre (puisque les attaques du 7 juillet en sont l&rsquo;\u00e9quivalent) essayant d&rsquo;expliquer au bon peuple britannique qu&rsquo;il ne pouvait pas faire autrement que de se battre contre Hitler. Au fond, la situation britannique est aujourd&rsquo;hui bien plus dramatique qu&rsquo;en 1940, si l&rsquo;on s&rsquo;arr\u00eate \u00e0 la question des nerfs: ceux du Premier ministre Churchill semblent avoir \u00e9t\u00e9 plus solides que ne le sont ceux, collectifs, de l&rsquo;\u00e9quipe Blair.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 19 juillet 2005 \u00e0 11H50<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le rapport du prestigieux RIIA (Chatham House) a eu un effet totalement t\u00e9tanisant sur le gouvernement Blair. C&rsquo;est le New York Times (IHT) qui l&rsquo;observe avec insistance, dans une appr\u00e9ciation comment\u00e9e que l&rsquo;\u00e9quipe gouvernementale britannique appr\u00e9ciera une fois de plus comme une aide bienveillante de l&rsquo;alli\u00e9 am\u00e9ricain. \u00ab The Blair government reacted sharply on Monday&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66610","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66610","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66610"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66610\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66610"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66610"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66610"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}