En marge du sort du JSF<\/a>, ou Joint Strike Fighter<\/em>, \u00e0 propos duquel le Financial Times<\/em> vient de publier une information (?) de type attentat-kamikaze<\/a>, on notera l’appr\u00e9ciation am\u00e9ricaine sur le fameux journal britannique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tIl s’agit de raisonner par analogie, ce qui est tout l’art du porte-parole officiel et de l’artiste du virtualisme. Lorsqu’il fut interrog\u00e9 sur l’information (?) en question, le porte-parole du Pentagone Lawrence Di Rita r\u00e9torqua ceci:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab Speculation about individual programs by people who themselves will not be involved in the decisions is irresponsible, uninformed and unhelpful. I have no doubt that somewhere in the beancounting end of the department people are laying out all kinds of possible scenarios, but if they are doing that, it is on the basis of incomplete slivers of info.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tCe commentaire de Di Rita se retrouve dans l’article du Financial Times<\/em>, le m\u00eame qui publie l’information (?) en question. Nous en d\u00e9duirons que le Financial Times<\/em> est \u00ab irresponsible, uninformed and unhelpful<\/em> \u00bb. \u00c7a, par contre, c’est une information (!).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 30 juillet 2005 \u00e0 06H50<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" En marge du sort du JSF, ou Joint Strike Fighter, \u00e0 propos duquel le Financial Times vient de publier une information (?) de type attentat-kamikaze, on notera l’appr\u00e9ciation am\u00e9ricaine sur le fameux journal britannique. Il s’agit de raisonner par analogie, ce qui est tout l’art du porte-parole officiel et de l’artiste du virtualisme. Lorsqu’il fut… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[250],"class_list":["post-66646","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-jsf"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66646","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66646"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66646\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66646"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66646"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66646"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}