In recent speeches and news conferences, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and the nation’s senior military officer have spoken of a global struggle against violent extremism rather than the global war on terror, which had been the catchphrase of choice.<\/em> \u00bb Faites le compte, on s’y retrouve: GSAVE \u00e0 la place de GWOT.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tEt le Weekly Standard<\/em> de geindre face \u00e0 ce changement d’\u00e9tiquette, concoct\u00e9 dans les services de relations publiques de l’administration (par une nouvelle venue en qu\u00eate d’images plus chouettes pour GW, Karen Hughes, la nouvelle sous-secr\u00e9taire d’\u00c9tat pour la diplomatie publique). Car ce changement signifierait, horreur indescriptible, qu’on ferait moins confiance \u00e0 la guerre, \u00e0 la force brute, \u00e0 la castagne, la vraie de vraie qui saigne et fait des taches: \u00ab It sounds for all the world as if the Bush administration wants to fight a more effective, more thoughtful, more strategic, more proactive, and dare we say it? more sensitive war on terror. And if you think you’ve heard that language before, you’re right. It came from John Kerry last fall. Kerry described the war on terror as occasionally military but argued that it is primarily an intelligence and law enforcement operation. Richard Holbrooke, Kerry’s senior foreign policy adviser, said: We’re not in a war on terror, in the literal sense. The war on terror is like saying the war on poverty.’ It’s just a metaphor.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb Bush, if you recall, was aghast: Anyone who thinks we are fighting a metaphor does not understand the enemy we face, and has no idea how to win the war and keep America secure. But that was then.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb The [Weekly Standard], just to be clear, understands that winning the GWOT will involve more than the application of brute military force. And we’re all in favor of learning about what others dream and what they value most. But what we have learned to our horror in recent years is that far too many people dream mostly of murdering us.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tPar cons\u00e9quent, m\u00eame les neocons<\/em> broient du noir, \u00e0 la pens\u00e9e qu’on pourrait penser qu’on puisse ne pas se servir tout le temps, exclusivement, sans exception, de la seule force militaire. On risque la d\u00e9pression.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 2 ao\u00fbt 2005 \u00e0 09H15<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Le climat n’est pas drolatique \u00e0 Washington ces jours-ci. Outre la pantalonnade de la confirmation de John Bolton, le moral est affect\u00e9 par d’autres affaires. Les neocons, malgr\u00e9 cette pantalonnade qui devrait les ravir, n’ont pas le moral, justement. On les entend m\u00eame grogner contre leur idole, GW, c’est dire. Ce qui les affecte profond\u00e9ment,… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3333,3332],"class_list":["post-66660","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-standard","tag-weekly"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66660","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66660"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66660\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66660"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66660"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66660"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}