Aviation Week & Space Technology du 8 ao\u00fbt<\/a> sur les malheurs du budget du Pentagone (DoD).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tChaque semaine apporte l’annonce de nouvelles contraintes, qui conduisent \u00e0 envisager de nouvelles r\u00e9ductions (nous reparlerons de celles qui concernent le JSF, dans cet article). Cette fois, c’est le prix du carburant<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tEt la conclusion rend effectivement un son de d\u00e9couragement complet, avec la mention compar\u00e9e du gargantuesque budget du DoD et des r\u00e9ductions, contraintes, gaspillages sans nombre que plus personne ne parvient \u00e0 contenir. Le DoD est aujourd’hui aussi out of control<\/em> que l’Irak, ceci expliquant (en partie) cela, au fait<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tL’auteur ayant cit\u00e9 en conclusion une possibilit\u00e9 de plus de l’abandon d’un programme (le E-10A) avec l’\u00e9conomie de $3-$4 milliards, il poursuit: \u00ab However, one financial analyst noted that $3-4 billion is a small fraction of the Defense Dept.’s expenses: $5.6 billion are spent each month on operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. With supplemental spending, the Pentagon’s annual budget surpasses $500 billion. Still, the Pentagon is facing an increasing population of veterans in need of healthcare, expensive operations abroad and cost growth in major acquisition programs.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 3 ao\u00f4ut 2005 \u00e0 09H10<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Attachons-nous aux remarques g\u00e9n\u00e9rales, souvent en conclusion d’articles de revues sp\u00e9cialis\u00e9es apr\u00e8s une abondance de donn\u00e9es pr\u00e9cises : elles nous donnent l’air du temps. C’est le cas ici, cette conclusion d’un article de Aviation Week & Space Technology du 8 ao\u00fbt sur les malheurs du budget du Pentagone (DoD). Chaque semaine apporte l’annonce de nouvelles… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66663","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66663","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66663"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66663\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66663"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}