Mr Schroder called for two but Mrs Merkel, claiming a lack of time, has said she will only have one. Thursday’s papers carry the victory for Mrs Merkel in that there will just be one TV duel on 4 September. However, some papers are openly sceptical about Mrs Merkel not having one day free in her calendar as Mr Schroder is generally considered a more fluent public speaker.<\/em> \u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t<196> Stoiber, le leader de la CSU, a refus\u00e9 un face-\u00e0-face TV avec Schr\u00f6der, craignant de devoir exprimer en public ses d\u00e9saccords avec la CDU. Les conservateurs, bavarois ou pas, disent qu’ils pr\u00e9f\u00e8rent parler aux gens dans la rue. On les comprend.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t• Entre temps, Merkel expose certaines de ses faiblesses et la tactique de repousser les affrontements avec le SPD appara\u00eet comme la crainte de se trouver sans r\u00e9el argument, sinon r\u00e9el programme. La presse allemande fait des gorges chaudes de son dernier impair: \u00ab The physics expert, who shot up the political ladder in the last 15 years, confused the difference between gross and net wages. In an interview with German magazine Bunte, Mrs Merkel said that the CDU wants to lower work security payments by two percent to get more growth and employment. But she then added that would mean a one percent rise in gross wages for the employee. She should have said, as several German newspapers pointed out, that it would mean a rise in net wages.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tConfusion g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, d’autant que Merkel avait fait la m\u00eame gaffe pr\u00e9c\u00e9demment, avec la cha\u00eene t\u00e9l\u00e9vis\u00e9e ARD. Selon le Financial Times Deutshland<\/em>, l’erreur fut supprim\u00e9 sur le site de la CDU \u00e0 l’aide d’une petite manip’, avec le mot correct mis dans la citation \u00e0 la place de l’erreur. Mais la station TV a publi\u00e9 le transcript de l’interview et l’erreur est d\u00e9sormais historique. (Une erreur semblable avait co\u00fbt\u00e9 cher au candidat du SPD Rudolf Shcharping, en 1994, contre Kohl.) Merkel a fait une autre gaffe avec leSpiegel<\/em>, concernant la politique de la CDU vis-\u00e0-vis du Pacte de stabilit\u00e9. Les gaffes de Merken deviennent une des rubriques de la campagne.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLa consigne du CDU-CSU : parler le moins possible, surtout Merkel, faire une campagne-stealth<\/em> \u00e0 tous crins, prier pour que les sondages restent favorables, et que la d\u00e9mocratie triomphe.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 4 ao\u00fbt 2005 \u00e0 14H00<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Comment ne pas perdre l’avance que leur donnent les sondages, alors qu’ils sont mal pr\u00e9par\u00e9s aux \u00e9lections, avec des dissensions CDU-CSU et un leader (Merkel) en tr\u00e8s moyenne forme. Voil\u00e0 le probl\u00e8me des conservateurs allemands alors que la campagne \u00e9lectorale commence. Par cons\u00e9quent : • Merkel manuvre \u00e0 toute vapeur pour \u00e9viter deux face-\u00e0-face TV… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4634,4633,3171],"class_list":["post-66668","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cdu-csu","tag-merkel","tag-schroder"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66668","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66668"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66668\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66668"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66668"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66668"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}