Global Struggle Against Violent Extremism<\/em>). Le d\u00e9faitiste munichois Rumsfeld est de ceux-l\u00e0.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tKristol admet que dans une guerre, il arrive qu’on fasse aussi de la politique. Concession majeure de sa part. Mais il se reprend aussit\u00f4t, en offrant un exemple fameux qui m\u00e9lange avec une maestria<\/em> sophistique \u00e9blouissante virtualisme, manipulation, r\u00e9alit\u00e9, etc : \u00ab It’s of course true that political progress in Iraq is important. And the political progress is heartening. But political progress is not sufficient to defeat the insurgency. There has been no more impressive example of political progress than the January 30 elections. But the insurgency continues.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tUn seul homme trouve gr\u00e2ce aux yeux de Kristol et de ses potes. Mais quel homme ! GW lui-m\u00eame. GW doit purger son \u00e9quipe de ses tra\u00eetres ti\u00e8des, sorte de vip\u00e8res lubriques (on n’ose dire : vip\u00e8res trotskistes). Au premier rang de tous, la vip\u00e8re lubrique et pacifiste Rumsfeld : \u00ab For if Iraq is the central front in the war on terror, we need to win there. And to win, the president needs a defense secretary who is willing to fight, and able to win.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 14 ao\u00fbt 2005 \u00e0 16H38<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Les n\u00e9o-conservateurs ont deux pr\u00e9occupations d\u00e9sormais. La premi\u00e8re est classique : faire la guerre, toujours la guerre, encore la guerre. La seconde a d\u00e9j\u00e0 \u00e9t\u00e9 esquiss\u00e9e mais elle se confirme d\u00e9sormais : la t\u00eate de Donald Rumsfeld. William Kristol, dans son dernier \u00e9dito du Weekly Standard du 15-22 ao\u00fbt plaide pour la guerre en Irak.… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66701","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66701","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66701"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66701\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66701"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66701"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66701"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}