laissant la premi\u00e8re place \u00e0 un communiqu\u00e9 sign\u00e9 conjointement<\/a> \u00e0 Washington et en Isra\u00ebl, par les deux ministres de la d\u00e9fense, sans qu’un d\u00e9placement, et encore moins une c\u00e9r\u00e9monie de r\u00e9conciliation, n’aient \u00e9t\u00e9 jug\u00e9s n\u00e9cessaires.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00ab The dispute between the United States and Israel regarding Israeli security exports came to an end Tuesday in the form of a joint statement issued by the U.S. Department of Defense and the Israeli Defense Ministry.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb According to the statement, The strategic alliance between the United States and Israel reflects common understandings of the global security environment. In this cooperative relationship, the United States and Israel share information and consult on possible threats to U.S. and Israeli defense interests.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb The U.S. Department of Defense and the Israeli Ministry of Defense have signed an understanding that is designed to remedy problems of the past that seriously affected the technology security relationship between their defense establishments and begins to restore confidence in the technology security area. In the coming months, additional steps will be taken to restore confidence fully.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb Signed by U.S. Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz, the joint statement adds that the signing of this understanding underscores the commitment of the U.S. and Israel to work together to address global security challenges. Cooperation between the U.S. and Israel is important to the security of the Middle East and we expect that cooperation to continue.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tHaaretz<\/em> pr\u00e9cise certaines conditions ou arrangements indiquant que les Isra\u00e9liens ont d\u00fb c\u00e9der aux Am\u00e9ricains sur des points non n\u00e9gligeables, dont certains engagent la mise en cause de leur souverainet\u00e9 nationale. L’important est pourtant d’appr\u00e9cier qu’il s’agit d’engagements \u00e0 venir ou \u00e0 concr\u00e9tiser, et qui seront des sources \u00e9videntes de d\u00e9saccords, notamment en raison du soup\u00e7on syst\u00e9matique et de la brutalit\u00e9 des Am\u00e9ricains d’une part, des r\u00e9ticences isra\u00e9liennes devant ces engagements d’autre part.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00a0Certes, Haaretz<\/em> pr\u00e9cise que Amos Yaron, le directeur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral du minist\u00e8re de la d\u00e9fense va se retirer dans les prochains mois. Yaron est la b\u00eate noire du Pentagone et Haaretz<\/em> peut \u00e9crire tranquillement \u00e0 son \u00e9gard, comme si la chose allait de soi, notamment ce droit de regard am\u00e9ricain dans les affaires int\u00e9rieures isra\u00e9liennes avec l’emploi du mot to blacklist<\/em>: \u00ab the U.S. administration will continue to blacklist Defense Ministry director general Amos Yaron, who is viewed by the Pentagon as responsible for misreporting the deal with China.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00a0L’engagement isra\u00e9lien est vaguement pr\u00e9cis\u00e9 de cette fa\u00e7on: \u00ab The understanding between the Israeli and U.S. defense establishment is based on Israel agreeing to adhere to the Wassenar Arrangement on Export Controls for Conventional Arms and Dual-Use Goods and Technologies. Israel will not be a full-fledged party to the arrangement, but will commit to transparency in its arms deals and report to the U.S. on sensitive issues. The Americans are interested primarily in information on deals involving China, which it views as a strategic threat.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tBien entendu, le segment de phrase qu’il convient de signaler pour r\u00e9sumer cette affaire et ce qui est pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 comme son heureuse conclusion est bien celui-ci: \u00ab Israel will<\/em> […] report to the U.S. on sensitive issues.<\/em> \u00bb Il s’agit d’une d\u00e9claration de principe insultante, qui fait d’Isra\u00ebl une annexe du Pentagone en mati\u00e8re de transferts de technologies, c’est-\u00e0-dire qui institue une abdication compl\u00e8te de sa souverainet\u00e9 nationale dans la mati\u00e8re essentielle du transfert de technologies.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tDu scotch usag\u00e9 pour raccommoder Washington et Isra\u00ebl? Sans le moindre doute. La pression des \u00e9v\u00e9nements ext\u00e9rieurs (le d\u00e9sengagement isra\u00e9lien des colonies) explique la capitulation isra\u00e9lienne, avec le besoin du soutien am\u00e9ricain. Un accord acquis dans de telles circonstances n’a aucune chance de durer. Son indignit\u00e9 m\u00eame en indique les limites, qui s’imposeront tr\u00e8s vite. L’intransigeance et la brutalit\u00e9 am\u00e9ricaines, le m\u00e9pris pour la souverainet\u00e9 d’autrui (celle d’Isra\u00ebl dans ce cas), conduiront au rench\u00e9rissement des exigences et ne laisseront aux Isra\u00e9liens d’autre choix que de r\u00e9agir d’une fa\u00e7on antagoniste. La crise, qui n’est qu’\u00e9cart\u00e9e et qui est pr\u00eate \u00e0 rena\u00eetre, le fera dans des circonstances d’autant plus difficiles que cet accord a \u00e9t\u00e9 pr\u00e9sent\u00e9 comme un engagement et comme un nouvel \u00e9tat d’esprit, et que chacun des deux partenaires d\u00e9noncera alors le comportement de l’autre \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re de l’interpr\u00e9tation qu’il fera de cet \u00e9tat d’esprit et non en raison d’arguments techniques. Les diff\u00e9rences d’interpr\u00e9tation mesureront la distance qui s\u00e9pare d\u00e9sormais Washington (le Pentagone) et Isra\u00ebl, et l’on constatera qu’elle est grande.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Washington et Isra\u00ebl raccommod\u00e9s avec du sparadrap usag\u00e9 18 ao\u00fbt 2005 Des communiqu\u00e9s plut\u00f4t ternes, une absence de d\u00e9tails qui en dit long, des promesses de nouvelles mesures impr\u00e9cises : tout dans les circonstances du raccommodage isra\u00e9lo-washingtonien sur l’affaire des transferts de technologies (isra\u00e9liennes) sent le rabibochage \u00e0 bon march\u00e9. Les Isra\u00e9liens ont c\u00e9d\u00e9 (pour… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[2774,3194,4714,4713],"class_list":["post-66712","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires","tag-israel","tag-pentagone","tag-tsahal","tag-yaron"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66712","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66712"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66712\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66712"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66712"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66712"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}