{"id":66717,"date":"2005-08-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-08-19T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/08\/19\/le-barrage-est-il-en-train-de-ceder\/"},"modified":"2005-08-19T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-08-19T00:00:00","slug":"le-barrage-est-il-en-train-de-ceder","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/08\/19\/le-barrage-est-il-en-train-de-ceder\/","title":{"rendered":"Le barrage est-il en train de c\u00e9der?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Encore notre ami Justin (Raimundo) \u00e0 la rescousse Car lorsqu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit de la question centrale du mouvement anti-guerre, Raimundo, libertarien de droite et grand animateur du prestigieux site dissident <a href=\"http:\/\/antiwar.com\" class=\"gen\">Antiwar.com<\/a>, est la sentinelle id\u00e9ale, l&rsquo;homme \u00e0 consulter. <a href=\"http:\/\/antiwar.com\/justin\/\" class=\"gen\">Sa chronique du jour<\/a> est particuli\u00e8rement int\u00e9ressante en ceci qu&rsquo;elle pose la question centrale, \u00e0 l&rsquo;esprit de laquelle nous empruntons notre titre et qui est dans toutes les sp\u00e9culations washingtoniennes: \u00ab <em>Antiwar Populism: The Floodgates Open.<\/em> \u00bb. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.antiwar.com\/lobe\/?articleid=7014\" class=\"gen\">Jim Lobe \u00e9galement<\/a>, autre chroniqueur avis\u00e9, se pose la m\u00eame question.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=1846\" class=\"gen\">Cindy Sheehan<\/a>, qui semble d\u00e9sormais irr\u00e9sistible par la popularit\u00e9 que cette m\u00e8re d&rsquo;un soldat tu\u00e9 en Irak suscite, des prises de position de s\u00e9nateurs comme Russ Feingold et Chuck Hagel, <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/news?tmpl=story&#038;u=\/ap\/20050818\/ap_on_go_co\/congressman_iraq\" class=\"gen\">une cinquantaine de d\u00e9put\u00e9s<\/a> pr\u00eats \u00e0 exiger une date de retrait selon le d\u00e9put\u00e9 Walter Jones, tout commence \u00e0 indiquer que le barrage est en train de c\u00e9der. Le flot du courant anti-guerre devenu un courant populaire (populiste selon Raimundo) semble d\u00e9sormais gonfler jusqu&rsquo;\u00e0 une situation o\u00f9 l&rsquo;on puisse envisager qu&rsquo;il submerge et emporte tout le syst\u00e8me mis en place par l&rsquo;administration GW et ses acolytes pour poursuivre leur catastrophique guerre irakienne.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes prochaines semaines avec la rentr\u00e9e parlementaire du d\u00e9but septembre vont \u00eatre cruciales. Elles nous diront si <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=1850\" class=\"gen\">le ni\u00e8me tournant d\u00e9cisif<\/a> dans la chute de popularit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;administration GW est le tournant effectivement d\u00e9cisif. A partir de quoi, tout devient possible, y compris les hypoth\u00e8ses les plus folles.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 19 ao\u00fbt 2005 \u00e0 10H36<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Encore notre ami Justin (Raimundo) \u00e0 la rescousse Car lorsqu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agit de la question centrale du mouvement anti-guerre, Raimundo, libertarien de droite et grand animateur du prestigieux site dissident Antiwar.com, est la sentinelle id\u00e9ale, l&rsquo;homme \u00e0 consulter. Sa chronique du jour est particuli\u00e8rement int\u00e9ressante en ceci qu&rsquo;elle pose la question centrale, \u00e0 l&rsquo;esprit de laquelle&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1094,1383,1359],"class_list":["post-66717","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-lobe","tag-raimundo","tag-sheehan"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66717","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66717"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66717\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66717"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66717"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}