{"id":66723,"date":"2005-08-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-08-20T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/08\/20\/le-new-york-times-se-dechaine\/"},"modified":"2005-08-20T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-08-20T00:00:00","slug":"le-new-york-times-se-dechaine","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/08\/20\/le-new-york-times-se-dechaine\/","title":{"rendered":"Le New York <em>Times<\/em> se d\u00e9cha\u00eene"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Quand le New York <em>Times<\/em> se met \u00e0 critiquer, directement et indirectement, tout ce qui se rapporte \u00e0 la politique am\u00e9ricaniste (anglo-saxonne) officielle, et dans ses \u00e9ditoriaux en plus, on peut \u00eatre s\u00fbr que la situation n&rsquo;est pas rose. Le grand journal dit lib\u00e9ral de New York a suffisamment montr\u00e9 sa prudence cauteleuse et son objectivit\u00e9 d\u00e9licatement orient\u00e9e depuis le 11 septembre 2001, vis-\u00e0-vis du pouvoir en place, et son m\u00e9pris scandalis\u00e9 pour toute critique de ce pouvoir, pour qu&rsquo;on s&rsquo;en convainque aussit\u00f4t: s&rsquo;il critique comme il fait, c&rsquo;est que le risque n&rsquo;est plus bien grand, la cible facile \u00e0 toucher et la chasse ouverte. On caricaturerait ais\u00e9ment cette situation avec l&rsquo;expression connue \u00e0 propos des rats qui quittent le navire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEn un seul jour, en date du 20 ao\u00fbt pour la reprise des textes dans l&rsquo;International <em>Herald Tribune<\/em>, deux \u00e9ditoriaux marquants.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t&bull; Le premier est <LIEN=http:\/\/www.iht.com\/\/articles\/2005\/08\/19\/opinion\/edshuttle.php>une violente attaque contre la NASA, o\u00f9 le NYT prend m\u00eame le parti d&rsquo;une minorit\u00e9, fait assez rare ces derniers temps: une minorit\u00e9 qui, dans un groupe qui enqu\u00eate sur la NASA depuis deux ans, adopte une approche critique radicale de sa gestion et de ses manipulations: \u00ab <em>After NASA spent two and a half years trying to repair the shuttles and instill a more rigorous, safety-conscious attitude in its work force, it was depressing to read a 19-page critique by the seven panelists accusing NASA of cutting corners to meet unrealistic launching schedules. That was precisely the kind of management failure that led to the Challenger disaster of 1986 and the Columbia accident in 2003. If left uncorrected, it will probably lead to another shuttle catastrophe in years to come.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t&bull; Le second est une critique non moins violente de la politique antiterroriste de Tony Blair, l&rsquo;ami fid\u00e8le, le soutien ind\u00e9fectible, le Churchill du XXI\u00e8me si\u00e8cle de la guerre contre la terreur. Les lois r\u00e9cemment \u00e9dict\u00e9es par Blair sont pass\u00e9es \u00e0 la loupe de la critique lib\u00e9rale et humaniste et compar\u00e9es, comble d&rsquo;audace au NYT, aux erreurs anti-d\u00e9mocratiques commises par l&rsquo;administration GW : \u00ab <em>Considering the costly damage the Bush administration has done to America&rsquo;s reputation and liberties through its abuse of similar authority, Blair should have known better than to open himself up to a repeat of the same mistakes.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 20 ao\u00fbt 2005 \u00e0 10H05<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Quand le New York Times se met \u00e0 critiquer, directement et indirectement, tout ce qui se rapporte \u00e0 la politique am\u00e9ricaniste (anglo-saxonne) officielle, et dans ses \u00e9ditoriaux en plus, on peut \u00eatre s\u00fbr que la situation n&rsquo;est pas rose. Le grand journal dit lib\u00e9ral de New York a suffisamment montr\u00e9 sa prudence cauteleuse et son&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4719,705,833],"class_list":["post-66723","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-anti-terrorisme","tag-blair","tag-nasa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66723","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66723"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66723\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66723"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66723"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66723"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}