Lorsqu’il s’agit de reconna\u00eetre une sup\u00e9riorit\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise, et le domaine est vaste, les Anglo-Saxons, surtout les Britanniques, ont leur mani\u00e8re bien \u00e0 eux. Subreptice, sans insister, comme s’ils \u00e9non\u00e7aient une banalit\u00e9 sur laquelle on ne s’attarde pas et de laquelle aucun enseignement n’est \u00e0 tirer, surtout pas un enseignement qui remettrait en question le mod\u00e8le anglo-saxon.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tDans ce registre, voici le Financial Times<\/a>, qui re\u00e7oit celui qu’il d\u00e9signe comme le Sh\u00e9riff, le juge Jean-Louis Brugui\u00e8re, qu’il consulte avec respect sur le terrorisme. Par petites touches, l’article-interview met en \u00e9vidence l’avance de la France dans la lutte anti-terrorisme<\/a>, et, par contraste, le laxisme et la courte vue des autres pays occidentaux, notamment anglo-saxons, qui continuent pourtant \u00e0 distribuer des le\u00e7ons au monde entier. (On se rappelle \u00e9galement des attaques anti-fran\u00e7aises, en 2002-2003, lorsque la France \u00e9tait accus\u00e9e de l\u00e2chet\u00e9 dans la lutte anti-terroriste.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLes extraits de l’article, indirectement sur le mod\u00e8le fran\u00e7ais, jusqu’\u00e0 ce que, bon prince, Brugui\u00e8re leur annonce que le mod\u00e8le n’est pas exportable :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab Mr Brugui\u00e8re has been warning about the growing threat of Islamic terrorists since a series of bombs in Paris in the mid-1980s. Long before September 11, he was warning about the risk of terrorists using an aircraft as a bomb, after foiling the 1994 hijacking of an Air France jet by Algerian radicals planning to crash it into the Eiffel tower. People pay more attention to him now. Few countries have invested their legal system with more authority to investigate and pre-empt terrorist attacks than France. Mr Brugui\u00e8re can get warrants to tap phones, search houses and lock people up for days with little more than an intelligence tip-off.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb He can hold suspects for 96 hours before they are charged or see a lawyer. Association with criminals involved in a terrorist enterprise carries a 10-year prison sentence and encompasses everything from financing terrorists to holding a false passport.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb Since 1986 specialist anti-terrorist judges, led by Mr Brugui\u00e8re, have worked alongside police and intelligence teams in a special anti-terror unit. By working more closely with the secret services the legal system is reinforced. In contrast, the UK suffers from not having a centralised approach to terrorism, making it difficult to know who is the best interlocutor he says.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb Mr Brugui\u00e8re says France’s connected and pro-active policy of permanent struggle reflects its history, and the recent memory of attacks by the Algerian GIA terror group on the Paris metro in the 1990s. Other European countries were not concerned by that, which did not allow a global response at that time.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb He dismisses recent calls for the UK to adopt the French model. The French model is not directly transferable to the UK because of the differences in judicial structure and organisation. However, he says France could be a source of ideas, such as on how to get intelligence services working more closely with law enforcement.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 27 ao\u00fbt 2005 \u00e0 12H50<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Lorsqu’il s’agit de reconna\u00eetre une sup\u00e9riorit\u00e9 fran\u00e7aise, et le domaine est vaste, les Anglo-Saxons, surtout les Britanniques, ont leur mani\u00e8re bien \u00e0 eux. Subreptice, sans insister, comme s’ils \u00e9non\u00e7aient une banalit\u00e9 sur laquelle on ne s’attarde pas et de laquelle aucun enseignement n’est \u00e0 tirer, surtout pas un enseignement qui remettrait en question le mod\u00e8le… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4724,1267],"class_list":["post-66745","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bruguiere","tag-terrorisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66745","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66745"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66745\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}