{"id":66759,"date":"2005-09-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-09-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/09\/01\/gw-lisolationniste\/"},"modified":"2005-09-01T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-09-01T00:00:00","slug":"gw-lisolationniste","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/09\/01\/gw-lisolationniste\/","title":{"rendered":"GW l&rsquo;isolationniste"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Francis Fukuyama, fameux pour nous avoir annonc\u00e9 en 1989 la fin de l&rsquo;Histoire, analyse (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.iht.com\/articles\/2005\/08\/31\/opinion\/edfuku.php\" class=\"gen\">ce jour dans l&rsquo;International Herald Tribune<\/a>) les possibilit\u00e9s d&rsquo;orientation de la politique ext\u00e9rieure US dans les deux prochaines ann\u00e9es. Il identifie correctement l&rsquo;invasion de l&rsquo;Irak comme une entreprise isolationniste, en ce sens qu&rsquo;elle fut lanc\u00e9e hors du concert international qui avait soutenu jusqu&rsquo;alors la politique internationaliste des USA.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPour cela, GW s&rsquo;appuya sur une alliance incertaine : celle des nationalistes jacksoniens (type-Rumsfeld) qui pr\u00f4ne une politique isolationniste agressive, avec les n\u00e9o-conservateurs, qui fournirent le <M>corpus<D> id\u00e9ologique \u00e0 l&rsquo;entreprise en lui donnant une teinte n\u00e9o-wilsonienne au travers d&rsquo;une dialectique qui pouvait passer pour un vernis internationaliste (imposer la d\u00e9mocratie par les armes). Comme toutes les alliances incertaines, celle-ci ne tiendra que si le succ\u00e8s la confirme. L&rsquo;entreprise irakienne est-elle un succ\u00e8s?<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tFukuyama envisage l&rsquo;hypoth\u00e8se plut\u00f4t n\u00e9gative et pr\u00e9voit alors une rupture de l&rsquo;alliance incertaine (on en a des pr\u00e9misses dans la querelle <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=1862\" class=\"gen\">entre Rumsfeld et les n\u00e9o-conservateurs<\/a>). Les cons\u00e9quences en seraient importantes, cette fois un retour vers un vrai isolationnisme de repli sur la dimension continentale : \u00ab <em>This war coalition is fragile, however, and vulnerable to mishap. If Jacksonians begin to perceive the war as a failure, there will be little future support for an expansive foreign policy that focuses on promoting democracy. That in turn could drive the 2008 Republican presidential primaries in ways likely to affect the future of American foreign policy as a whole.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 1er septembre 2005 \u00e0 08H35<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Francis Fukuyama, fameux pour nous avoir annonc\u00e9 en 1989 la fin de l&rsquo;Histoire, analyse (ce jour dans l&rsquo;International Herald Tribune) les possibilit\u00e9s d&rsquo;orientation de la politique ext\u00e9rieure US dans les deux prochaines ann\u00e9es. Il identifie correctement l&rsquo;invasion de l&rsquo;Irak comme une entreprise isolationniste, en ce sens qu&rsquo;elle fut lanc\u00e9e hors du concert international qui avait&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66759","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66759","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66759"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66759\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66759"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66759"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66759"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}