{"id":66795,"date":"2005-09-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-09-08T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/09\/08\/ah-la-dessus-un-attentat-terroriste-aux-usa-arrangerait-bien-des-choses\/"},"modified":"2005-09-08T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-09-08T00:00:00","slug":"ah-la-dessus-un-attentat-terroriste-aux-usa-arrangerait-bien-des-choses","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/09\/08\/ah-la-dessus-un-attentat-terroriste-aux-usa-arrangerait-bien-des-choses\/","title":{"rendered":"Ah, l\u00e0-dessus, un attentat terroriste aux USA arrangerait bien des choses"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Joseph P. Diaferia, d\u00e9veloppe sur <a href=\"http:\/\/www.onlinejournal.com\/Commentary\/090705Diaferia\/090705diaferia.html\" class=\"gen\">le site OnLine Journal<\/a> la th\u00e8se de la possibilit\u00e9 d&rsquo;un attentat de type terrorisme synth\u00e9tique (terrorisme fabriqu\u00e9, ou encore : provocation, manipulation, etc). Il faut dire que, vu les ennuis de GW et \u00e0 l&rsquo;occasion du quatri\u00e8me anniversaire du 11 septembre, cela ferait assez bien dans le paysage.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tGratuite et un peu parano, la th\u00e8se de Diaferia? A propos de parano\u00efa, \u00e0 laquelle la presse s\u00e9rieuse est prompte \u00e0 se r\u00e9f\u00e9rer d\u00e8s qu&rsquo;un journaliste semi-dissident \u00e9voque la possibilit\u00e9 de montages, il faudrait mesurer son usage par les dirigeants s\u00e9rieux du monde occidental, am\u00e9ricanistes pour commencer, dans les quatre derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es. Cela s&#8217;empile autant que les promesses de trouver des ADM chez Saddam. Alors, \u00e9coutons un peu plus les soi-disant paranos.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDiaferia \u00e9voque le cas du g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Kevin P. Byrnes, qui vient d&rsquo;\u00eatre relev\u00e9 (en ao\u00fbt) de son commandement pour adult\u00e8re, faute \u00e9pouvantable dans le contexte des r\u00e9ussites morales des aventures militaires US en Irak et partout dans le monde, et de la sauvegarde de La Nouvelle Orl\u00e9ans. Diaferia poursuit : \u00ab <em>&#8230;General Byrnes, it should be noted, headed the Army&rsquo;s Training and Doctrine Command, which was conducting a nuclear incident exercise in the area of Charleston, South Carolina. Investigative journalists have provided evidence that the intent of this exercise was to go live with an actual detonation of a nuclear device as a means of staging a false flag terrorist act. Such a terrorist attack would most certainly have resulted in a dramatic escalation of the war in the Middle East, and quite possibly a tactical nuclear strike against Iran (not to mention, martial law here in the U.S.).<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>General Byrnes reportedly was preparing to expose the conspirators in the hopes of preventing the war on terror from heightening into a broader global conflict. If such is the case, it would not take much to conclude that his firing is intended to silence him, and that he is probably still under the threat of criminal prosecution, or even death.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Since the immediate aftermath of 9\/11, Americans have been repeatedly warned of the inevitability of a second terrorist attack on American soil.  Another terrorist attack is not a matter of if, but when we keep hearing. We should also recall that during the summer of 2004, official inquiries were made into the constitutionality of postponing the 2004 presidential elections in the event of a terrorist attackfueling suspicion that the Bush administration was not about to accept an unfavorable electoral outcome.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t(&#8230;)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Presently, the threat of synthetic terrorism should be addressed with the utmost gravity and immediacy for two reasons. First, the firing of General Kevin P. Byrnes suggests that such a terrorist act might have been  and might even still be imminent. Secondly, most Americans are focused on the aftermath of the devastating Hurricane Katrina.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>With the mass deployment of relief and military personnel to the areas affected by Katrina, is it entirely inconceivable that the administration might choose this occasion to stage a terrorist attack? Bush could certainly argue that the diversion of such personnel to the southern states resulted in an unavoidable relaxation of the nation&rsquo;s security networks, thus enabling an attack to occur unhindered. Moreover, what could be more infuriating to Americans than to believe that terrorists exploited the occasion of a horrendous natural disaster to deliver a disaster of their making upon an already grieving American population? A wave of unprecedented patriotic indignation would most certainly follow.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 8 septembre 2005 \u00e0 06H35<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Joseph P. Diaferia, d\u00e9veloppe sur le site OnLine Journal la th\u00e8se de la possibilit\u00e9 d&rsquo;un attentat de type terrorisme synth\u00e9tique (terrorisme fabriqu\u00e9, ou encore : provocation, manipulation, etc). Il faut dire que, vu les ennuis de GW et \u00e0 l&rsquo;occasion du quatri\u00e8me anniversaire du 11 septembre, cela ferait assez bien dans le paysage. Gratuite et&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66795","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66795","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66795"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66795\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66795"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66795"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66795"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}