{"id":66800,"date":"2005-09-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-09-09T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/09\/09\/pourquoi-pas-powell\/"},"modified":"2005-09-09T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-09-09T00:00:00","slug":"pourquoi-pas-powell","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/09\/09\/pourquoi-pas-powell\/","title":{"rendered":"Pourquoi pas Powell ?"},"content":{"rendered":"

On cherche d\u00e9sesp\u00e9r\u00e9ment \u00e0 Washington un homme, vertueux, populaire, qui pourrait prendre en charge un poste cr\u00e9\u00e9 pour l’occasion de coordinateur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des secours et de la reconstruction post-Katrina. On attendrait de lui qu’il d\u00e9samorce la crise politique en train de prendre des proportions pr\u00e9occupantes pour GW.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tQuel homme choisir? Pourquoi pas Colin Powell? Il est vertueux et populaire (et noir de surcro\u00eet). Il est d’une droiture exemplaire, tant dans sa vie publique que dans sa vie priv\u00e9e. Par les temps qui courent, c’est une perle rare. On en parle \u00e0 Washington, comme le pr\u00e9cise le site Radar OnLine<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab With George W. Bush’s approval rating at an all-time low following the bungled hurricane relief effort, sources say the White House has turned to the most trusted man ever associated with the administration to save the president’s political bacon. The only question is, will Colin Powell take the job?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t(…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb If Powell is indeed the appointee, as D.C. sources say is likely, it would give the former secretary of state and general the opportunity to reprise his Gulf War leadership on America’s own gulf coast. It would also give Powell, who left the administration amid infighting over foreign policy, a chance to receive a hero’s welcome on the world stagesomething his reputation could use after he appeared before the United Nations with bogus proof of Saddam Hussein’s illegal weapons program.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl serait int\u00e9ressant de voir si Powell avalerait sa ni\u00e8me couleuvre en acceptant de venir au secours d’une administration au sein de laquelle il fut trait\u00e9 d’une fa\u00e7on ignominieuse, autant par les n\u00e9o-conservateurs en place que par Rumsfeld et Cheney. (Son d\u00e9part en novembre dernier fut dans la m\u00eame veine : il ressembla \u00e0 un cong\u00e9diement de la part du pr\u00e9sident.) S’il acceptait, il y aurait bien des commentateurs europ\u00e9ens pour en conclure qu’enfin l’administration GW passe de l’unilat\u00e9ralisme \u00e0 l’internationalisme.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 9 septembre 2005 \u00e0 06H10<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On cherche d\u00e9sesp\u00e9r\u00e9ment \u00e0 Washington un homme, vertueux, populaire, qui pourrait prendre en charge un poste cr\u00e9\u00e9 pour l’occasion de coordinateur g\u00e9n\u00e9ral des secours et de la reconstruction post-Katrina. On attendrait de lui qu’il d\u00e9samorce la crise politique en train de prendre des proportions pr\u00e9occupantes pour GW. Quel homme choisir? Pourquoi pas Colin Powell? Il… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66800"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66800\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}