{"id":66801,"date":"2005-09-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-09-09T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/09\/09\/bagdad-new-orleans-meme-combat-evidemment\/"},"modified":"2005-09-09T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-09-09T00:00:00","slug":"bagdad-new-orleans-meme-combat-evidemment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/09\/09\/bagdad-new-orleans-meme-combat-evidemment\/","title":{"rendered":"Bagdad, New Orleans, m\u00eame combat… \u00e9videmment<\/em><\/strong>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Bagdad, New Orleans, m\u00eame combat… \u00e9videmment<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t9 septembre 2005 Il \u00e9tait logique d’attendre que l’opposition engendr\u00e9e par la guerre en Irak et celle qui na\u00eet de la crise de l’ouragan Katrina convergent et se rassemblent. Un rassemblement pr\u00e9vu par le groupe ANSWER le 24 septembre devrait fournir le premier test populaire de cette convergence.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t(La chose nous paraissait assez raisonnable \u00e0 envisager d\u00e8s le 31 ao\u00fbt<\/a> : \u00ab En un sens dont nous ne cachons pas la faveur que nous lui accordons, les effets<\/em> politiques<\/em><\/strong> de Katrina pourraient rencontrer les effets politiques de l’opposition \u00e0 la guerre en Irak qui commencent \u00e0 se faire sentir aux USA. Si l’on veut r\u00e9sumer par une formule qui eut de la faveur in illo tempore, et qui ferait esp\u00e9rer que malheurs et morts innombrables ne sont pas compl\u00e8tement en vain: Katrina’ et Cindy Sheehan, m\u00eame combat.<\/em> \u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tUn article du Washington Post d’hier<\/a> rend compte de cette \u00e9volution :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab The calamity of Hurricane Katrina and criticism of the federal response are fast becoming a rallying cry in the antiwar debate.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t(…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb From Iraq to New Orleans, fund human needs, not the war machine, many of the protesters shouted in Lafayette Square last night. We’re reorienting the antiwar movement to make the connection between the vast expenditure for the war in Iraq and the woefully inadequate response to the victims of Katrina, said Brian Becker, national coordinator for the ANSWER Coalition, which sponsored the rally.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t(…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb The New York offices of United for Peace and Justice, a sponsor of the Sept. 24 rally with ANSWER, have been inundated with calls from people who want to join the movement because of their dissatisfaction with the federal response on the Gulf Coast, said Leslie Cagan, national coordinator for the group. Just in the past two or three days, the phones have been ringing off the hook here, Cagan said. I think this disaster is helping more people make the connections and see the ways this war is impacting our nation.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tOn trouve confirm\u00e9 le constat qu’on pouvait faire aussit\u00f4t apr\u00e8s la catastrophe (voir notre m\u00eame F&C<\/a>), qui est l’extr\u00eame politisation de tous<\/strong> les \u00e9v\u00e9nements aux USA, et la politisation instantan\u00e9e des r\u00e9actions \u00e0 cette catastrophe. C’est certainement ce qui rend Katrina compl\u00e8tement exceptionnel, qui en fait un \u00e9v\u00e9nement historique: que cette calamit\u00e9 naturelle ait \u00e9t\u00e9 aussit\u00f4t per\u00e7ue en termes humains et politiques \u00e0 la fois, c’est-\u00e0-dire en termes id\u00e9ologiques fondamentaux qui renvoy\u00e8rent aussit\u00f4t \u00e0 la tr\u00e8s profonde division de l’Am\u00e9rique. Ce ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne se lit d’ailleurs dans les sondages sur le comportement de l’administration face \u00e0 Katrina, qui renvoient \u00e0 cette division politique<\/a>. Les r\u00e9ponses des personnes qui r\u00e9pondent aux enqu\u00eates sont plus appuy\u00e9es sur leur perception politique de l’administration GW pour interpr\u00e9ter les \u00e9v\u00e9nements autour de Katrina que sur leur perception directe des \u00e9v\u00e9nements autour de Katrina:<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Although much criticism has been directed at officials on national, state and local levels about their handling of Katrina’s aftermath, a new CNN\/Gallup\/USA Today poll shows Americans have mixed feelings about the response.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Forty-two percent of respondents to the survey said federal government agencies responsible for handling emergencies had done a bad or terrible job, 20 percent said their response was neither good nor bad and 35 percent deemed it great or good. President Bush earned similar marks, with 42 percent rating his response negatively, 35 percent rating it positively and 21 percent choosing the middle option. The public was slightly easier on Louisiana officials; a small plurality gave their response favorable marks.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb More than 60 percent of those surveyed said they believed that progress made in dealing with the situation was satisfactory, while 35 percent said it was not. A 38-percent plurality said no one not Bush, federal agencies or local officials was to blame for the problems after the hurricane, and respondents stopped short of calling for anyone’s head. Fewer than three in 10 said federal officials responsible for handling emergencies should be fired.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tLa situation aux Etats-Unis est particuli\u00e8rement politis\u00e9e aujourd’hui, plus encore qu’elle ne l’\u00e9tait avant Katrina. C’est-\u00e0-dire que le pays est compl\u00e8tement et fortement divis\u00e9 sur cette question comme sur le reste, et Katrina a m\u00eame renforc\u00e9 la vigueur de cette division ; cela repr\u00e9sente naturellement un changement fondamental par rapport \u00e0 l’attaque terroriste du 11 septembre 2001.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’autre changement fondamental par rapport \u00e0 9\/11, qui a pris corps ces derniers jours, c’est le complet renversement de l’attitude de la presse \u00e0 l’\u00e9gard de l’administration<\/a>. Il s’agit d’un facteur important dans la mesure o\u00f9 il devrait contribuer \u00e0 faciliter de fa\u00e7on d\u00e9cisive la circulation des positions politiques des uns et des autres, et surtout la circulation des critiques de l’administration et des positions des opposants structurels \u00e0 l’administration GW (comme le mouvement anti-guerre qui veut capitaliser sur les r\u00e9actions d\u00e9favorables \u00e0 GW apr\u00e8s Katrina).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tToute autre chose est l’\u00e9volution psychologique des Am\u00e9ricains<\/a>, dont nous faisons grand cas dans nos textes<\/a>. Il s’agit d’une \u00e9volution inconsciente, qui implique l’optimisme ou le pessimisme du sentiment et de la perception, qui ne se retranscrit pas n\u00e9cessairement en soutien \u00e0 Bush ou en opposition \u00e0 Bush (le lien de cause \u00e0 effet, s’il existe sans aucun doute, est tr\u00e8s indirect et tr\u00e8s insaisissable \u00e0 d\u00e9finir et \u00e0 pr\u00e9voir). N\u00e9anmoins, on peut \u00eatre assur\u00e9 que cette \u00e9volution psychologique, si elle a lieu, contribuera \u00e0 dramatiser fortement les oppositions et les affrontements, et elle p\u00e8sera de ce fait tr\u00e8s fortement sur les d\u00e9cisions politiques et leurs cons\u00e9quences.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Bagdad, New Orleans, m\u00eame combat… \u00e9videmment 9 septembre 2005 Il \u00e9tait logique d’attendre que l’opposition engendr\u00e9e par la guerre en Irak et celle qui na\u00eet de la crise de l’ouragan Katrina convergent et se rassemblent. Un rassemblement pr\u00e9vu par le groupe ANSWER le 24 septembre devrait fournir le premier test populaire de cette convergence. (La… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66801","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-faits-et-commentaires"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66801","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66801"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66801\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66801"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66801"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66801"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}