Bin Laden’s organisation may have been damaged and disrupted since 2001, and his dreadful cause may in many places be in the hands of amateurs, but he could never have dreamed that the world four years after the twin towers would look so favourable to his objectives.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tOn r\u00e9sumera l’int\u00e9r\u00eat et l’importance de ce texte avec trois citations.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t• La guerre contre la terreur et la riposte am\u00e9ricaine apr\u00e8s 9\/11 : les Am\u00e9ricains ont fait tout le travail de Ben Laden, parce que \u00ab [m]uch of the response to it, however, was not just ineffective but counter-productive<\/em> \u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t• La guerre en Irak est l’\u00e9v\u00e9nement fondamental, mais pas pour ce que l’on croit : \u00ab the real surprise <\/em>[is] the limits of the US military effort. America has fought and occupied, but it has not shown that it can rebuild.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t• Apr\u00e8s quatre ans de guerre inefficace et dispendieuse, Katrina a chang\u00e9 la donne, notamment pour ce qui concerne l’engagement US en Irak: \u00ab Post-Katrina, the question is not whether the US will begin to withdraw but when, how and, above all, with what damage.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tOn ajoutera que cette derni\u00e8re remarque, si elle est faite pour l’Irak, pourrait concerner bien d’autres engagements US dans the Rest Of the World<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 14 septembre 2005 \u00e0 10H11<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
L’\u00e9ditorial du 12 septembre du Guardian est un texte int\u00e9ressant \u00e0 plus d’un \u00e9gard, qui vaut la lecture. Il donne une vue r\u00e9aliste sur la situation am\u00e9ricaine quatre ans apr\u00e8s l’attaque du 11 septembre 2001. La conclusion en est fulgurante: \u00ab Bin Laden’s organisation may have been damaged and disrupted since 2001, and his dreadful… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4747,3265,857,3266],"class_list":["post-66822","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-9-11","tag-ben","tag-irak","tag-laden"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66822","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66822"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66822\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66822"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66822"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}