{"id":66911,"date":"2005-10-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-10-10T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/10\/10\/pour-les-incoherences-syriennes-voyez-washington\/"},"modified":"2005-10-10T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-10-10T00:00:00","slug":"pour-les-incoherences-syriennes-voyez-washington","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/10\/10\/pour-les-incoherences-syriennes-voyez-washington\/","title":{"rendered":"Pour les incoh\u00e9rences syriennes, voyez Washington"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Les r\u00e9v\u00e9lations et autres indications de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/9629607\/site\/newsweek\/\" class=\"gen\">Newsweek du 17 octobre<\/a> sur la politique syrienne des Etats-Unis montrent une incoh\u00e9rence compl\u00e8te ; incoh\u00e9rence incompr\u00e9hensible malgr\u00e9 le peu d&rsquo;estime qu&rsquo;on peut avoir pour l&rsquo;administration,  incompr\u00e9hensible \u00e0 moins qu&rsquo;on ne l&rsquo;analyse au travers du prisme de la situation politique washingtonienne compl\u00e8tement \u00e9clat\u00e9e en groupes de pression concurrents, y compris (surtout pour ce cas) au sein de l&rsquo;administration.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe magazine rapporte que les Am\u00e9ricains ont failli d\u00e9cider une attaque a\u00e9rienne contre la Syrie, et que seule l&rsquo;intervention de Rice (le d\u00e9partement d&rsquo;\u00c9tat est pr\u00e9occup\u00e9 des effets diplomatiques d&rsquo;une telle action) l&rsquo;a emp\u00each\u00e9e. Le Pentagone veut frapper la Syrie pour renforcer et officialiser la th\u00e8se selon laquelle la r\u00e9sistance irakienne les tient en \u00e9chec seulement \u00e0 cause de l&rsquo;aide ext\u00e9rieure. La Maison-Blanche veut maintenir une position officielle d&rsquo;hostilit\u00e9 pour satisfaire ses id\u00e9ologues (les n\u00e9o-conservateurs, dont GW reste tr\u00e8s proche dans l&rsquo;esprit) et ne pas d\u00e9mentir les th\u00e8ses type-axe du mal<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCette attitude am\u00e9ricaine finit par compromettre la coop\u00e9ration officieuse extr\u00eamement f\u00e9conde de la Syrie avec les USA. La CIA s&rsquo;en \u00e9meut mais le Pentagone n&rsquo;est pas m\u00e9content de voir la CIA perdre certains de ses moyens. L&rsquo;explication de la crise am\u00e9ricano-syrienne est \u00e0 Washington et nulle part ailleurs. Elle rel\u00e8ve du pur virtualisme politicien.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tQuelques <a href=\"http:\/\/news.yahoo.com\/s\/afp\/20051009\/wl_mideast_afp\/ussyriairaqstrikes\" class=\"gen\">pr\u00e9cisions sur l&rsquo;article<\/a>: \u00ab <em>The same article also reported that Syria had ended all security and intelligence cooperation with the United States several months ago after growing frustrated with persistent public criticism from Washington.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Syria&rsquo;s ambassador to the United States, Imad Moustapha, told Newsweek that his government continued to detain Islamic extremists and remained willing to resume cooperation if the public bashing stopped. We are willing to re-engage the moment you want but one condition, the magazine quotes Moustapha as saying. You have to acknowledge that we are helping.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Moustapha also confirmed an account from a US intelligence official that Damascus had been angered when Washington exposed one of its operatives. While criticizing Syria in public statements, the United States had privately praised Damascus for handing over the half brother of Saddam Hussein, Sabawi Ibrahim al-Hassan, earlier in the year, the magazine reported. Moustapha said Syria could do more to assist the United States if intelligence was shared as in the past.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The magazine reported that some US intelligence officials believed Washington now was losing out on vital information. Syrian cooperation in the last few years allegedly had helped avert two possible attacks against US targets, including a Navy base in Bahrain. One unnamed intelligence official told the magazine that US pressure on the Syrian leadership could prove counter-productive and that Washington may be radicalizing the country.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 10 octobre 2005 \u00e0 10H15<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Les r\u00e9v\u00e9lations et autres indications de Newsweek du 17 octobre sur la politique syrienne des Etats-Unis montrent une incoh\u00e9rence compl\u00e8te ; incoh\u00e9rence incompr\u00e9hensible malgr\u00e9 le peu d&rsquo;estime qu&rsquo;on peut avoir pour l&rsquo;administration, incompr\u00e9hensible \u00e0 moins qu&rsquo;on ne l&rsquo;analyse au travers du prisme de la situation politique washingtonienne compl\u00e8tement \u00e9clat\u00e9e en groupes de pression concurrents, y&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66911","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66911","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66911"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66911\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66911"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66911"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}