Democratic fundraisers who speak with the New York Senator’s tight circle of advisers guesstimate that Clinton’s campaign intends to raise as much as $70m for the re-election campaign and spend about $40m of it leaving them with a nice, $30m cushion should any other, eh, opportunities present themselves. Folks who actually know such things poo-pooh any specific plans so far in advance.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tUn tel tr\u00e9sor de guerre encore disponible fin 2006 devrait effectivement exercer une forte pression sur le clan Clinton pour une candidature en 2008. Sempiternelle question: l’Am\u00e9rique est-elle pr\u00eate pour une femme candidate en 2008? R\u00e9ponse sans h\u00e9siter: apr\u00e8s GW et ses ann\u00e9es catastrophiques, l’Am\u00e9rique devrait \u00eatre pr\u00eate \u00e0 n’importe quoi. D’autre part, il faut admettre qu’\u00e0 la mesure du courant des candidats, Hillary Rodham Clinton est beaucoup plus que n’importe quoi.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 16 octobre 2005 \u00e0 12H27<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
On peut se demander si Hillary Rodham Clinton (qu’on commence \u00e0 d\u00e9signer sous ses initiales HRC, signe des temps) ne va pas renverser l’habituelle obligation d’une campagne pr\u00e9sidentielle, sorte d’adaptation \u00e0 nos murs postmodernes de l’observation que l’existence pr\u00e9c\u00e8de l’essence. D’habitude, un politicien d\u00e9cide d’\u00eatre candidat et se met en campagne pour trouver l’argent qui… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66926","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66926","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66926"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66926\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66926"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66926"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66926"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}