{"id":66931,"date":"2005-10-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-10-18T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/10\/18\/ouf-chavez-en-est-aussi\/"},"modified":"2005-10-18T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2005-10-18T00:00:00","slug":"ouf-chavez-en-est-aussi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2005\/10\/18\/ouf-chavez-en-est-aussi\/","title":{"rendered":"Ouf ! Chavez en est aussi"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Cela tardait beaucoup, mais enfin nous l&rsquo;avons. La r\u00e9v\u00e9lation tant attendue,  que Chavez fait bien entendu partie de l&rsquo;axe du mal et que, comme tout membre actif particuli\u00e8rement nuisible, il a choisi le pire de tout : il cherche une bombe nucl\u00e9aire pour mettre oncle Sam \u00e0 genoux. On va s&rsquo;occuper de lui.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tC&rsquo;est <a href=\"http:\/\/insider.washingtontimes.com\/articles\/normal.php?StoryID=20051016-112537-4689r\" class=\"gen\">la r\u00e9v\u00e9lation du jour<\/a> du Washington <em>Times<\/em>, le journal du r\u00e9v\u00e9rend Moon, dont la r\u00e9daction est d&rsquo;esprit proche des n\u00e9o-conservateurs, de Rupert Murdoch &#038; compagnie. (Mais <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2075\" class=\"gen\">les choses bougent<\/a> autour du quotidien.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa nouvelle est annonc\u00e9 dans les normes, avec des officiels du d\u00e9partement d&rsquo;\u00c9tat et du Pentagone qui pr\u00e9f\u00e8rent garder l&rsquo;anonymat, des \u00e9valuations pr\u00e9sent\u00e9es de fa\u00e7on raisonnable et <em>authoritative<\/em> (il est entendu que la d\u00e9raison est du c\u00f4t\u00e9 de Chavez), par des experts qui ont \u00e0 leur actif les pr\u00e9visions sur les armements de destruction massive de l&rsquo;Irak. Cette attitude raisonnable \u00e9tant acquise comme la garantie de l&rsquo;objectivit\u00e9 de l&rsquo;information, on peut alors appr\u00e9cier toute l&rsquo;\u00e9tendue de la menace-Chavez contre les USA, y compris le terrible \u00e9quipement d\u00e9j\u00e0 commenc\u00e9 de 100.000 Kalachnikov AK-47.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>The administration official said there is no clear evidence that Mr. Chavez wants to develop nuclear weapons. But, the source said, there is consistent intelligence reporting that his government has discussed obtaining technology from other countries.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Mr. Chavez, a populist who has ratcheted up anti-U.S. rhetoric as he forges ties with some of America&rsquo;s adversaries, is in the middle of a military buildup that some analysts in the Bush administration fear is a precursor to ending elections. Chavez would like to have everything. He has the money to do it, said the official, noting Venezuela&rsquo;s vast oil reserves. He wants new fighter jets. He wants to put a satellite in space.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>He has formed an alliance with Cuban leader Fidel Castro, who has sent thousands of government officials to Venezuela. Mr. Chavez is forming what Pentagon officials say are neighborhood militias modeled after Cuba&rsquo;s communist apparatus to maintain iron-fisted control. The U.S. administration official said Venezuela has begun taking delivery of more than 100,000 Russian-made AK-47s, some of which will arm the militias. It is also ramping up production of small-arms rounds that the Bush administration fears will be shipped to rebels in democratic parts of Latin America.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 18 octobre 2005 \u00e0 12H40<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cela tardait beaucoup, mais enfin nous l&rsquo;avons. La r\u00e9v\u00e9lation tant attendue, que Chavez fait bien entendu partie de l&rsquo;axe du mal et que, comme tout membre actif particuli\u00e8rement nuisible, il a choisi le pire de tout : il cherche une bombe nucl\u00e9aire pour mettre oncle Sam \u00e0 genoux. On va s&rsquo;occuper de lui. C&rsquo;est la&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-66931","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66931","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66931"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66931\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66931"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66931"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66931"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}