It’s a sign of the times when even the people who bankroll Washington’s leading conservative newspaper are said to be uneasy with Bush administration foreign policy. But in that heretical spirit, a revolt is reportedly brewing at the Unification Church, which owns the Washington Times and is pushing for changes at the paper.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb Insiders say the church’s new line is that with the end of the Cold War, it’s important to support international organizations such as the United Nations and to campaign for world peace and interfaith understanding. That stance would be awkward for the Times’s hard-line editor in chief, Wesley Pruden, and its stable of neoconservative columnists.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tC’est une situation in\u00e9dite. Le r\u00e9dacteur en chef Pruden se glorifie de l’ind\u00e9pendance de la r\u00e9daction (\u00ab Pruden responded yesterday to the reports of friction between the paper and the church over foreign policy: What you’re saying confirms that we operate independently<\/em> \u00bb) ; par ailleurs, ce conflit se d\u00e9roule au sein d’un syst\u00e8me qu’il d\u00e9fend becs et ongles, et qui donne tous les droits aux forces de l’argent (et donc, dans son cas, \u00e0 l’organisation du r\u00e9v\u00e9rend Moon). De m\u00eame, Pruden va s’appuyer, dans la m\u00e9chante bagarre qui s’annonce, sur des alli\u00e9s politique \u00e0 Washington qui sont d\u00e9fenseurs du m\u00eame syst\u00e8me de la pr\u00e9pond\u00e9rance de l’argent. (\u00ab Pruden won’t give up control of the Times without a fight. And he has powerful Republican friends on Capitol Hill and in the administration who would probably back a campaign to maintain the paper’s editorial line and fend off meddling by its owners. What’s clear from the Times-Moon dust-up is that the battle for the soul of conservatism has a new front.<\/em> \u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLe conflit du Washington Times<\/em> va \u00e9galement mettre en \u00e9vidence les difficiles situations cr\u00e9\u00e9es par la globalisation: le Washington Times<\/em>, consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme un journal US, devant soutenir la politique ultra-conservatrice de l’administratoon; mais appartenant \u00e0 un groupe sud-cor\u00e9en, soutenu par de l’argent japonais, toutes ces forces s’opposant d\u00e9sormais \u00e0 la politique de Bush.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tDerni\u00e8re remarque: les propri\u00e9taires de m\u00e9dias \u00e9voluent en ce moment. Avant Moon, le tycoon<\/em> canadien Lord Black, Canadien proche des conservateurs britanniques et propri\u00e9taire d’une cha\u00eene de journaux dans plusieurs pays (dont The Spectator<\/em> et The Daily Telegraph<\/em> \u00e0 Londres), a abandonn\u00e9 le soutien \u00e0 la politique ext\u00e9rieure de GW Bush.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 18 octobre 2005 \u00e0 12H55<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Ce m\u00eame Washington Times dont la ligne \u00e9ditoriale est \u00e0 peu pr\u00e8s \u00e0 la droite des n\u00e9o-conservateurs, qui d\u00e9nonce Chavez r\u00e9guli\u00e8rement comme on lit par ailleurs, est entr\u00e9 dans une zone de turbulence. Il y a d\u00e9sormais un d\u00e9saccord profond entre le r\u00e9v\u00e9rend Sun Myung Moon (propri\u00e9taire du Washington Times) et la direction de la… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2852,3248],"class_list":["post-66932","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-times","tag-washington"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66932","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66932"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/66932\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66932"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=66932"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=66932"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}